- With standard equipment
- With safety pack
Meer informatie vindt u in de sectie Opmerkingen van de beoordeling
Meer informatie vindt u in het tabblad Geldigheid van de beoordeling
- Lees meer
- Lees meer
- Lees meer
- Lees meer
- Goed
- Voldoende
- Twijfelachtig
- Zwak
- Slecht








-
Naderen van een stilstaande auto: Offset links
-
Naderen van een stilstaande auto: Geen offset
-
Naderen van een stilstaande auto: Offset rechts
- Goed
- Voldoende
- Twijfelachtig
- Zwak
- Slecht


Passagier
(buitenste zitplaatsen)
Midden
Standaard uitrusting
Niet aanwezig op het testvoertuig, maar als optie verkrijgbaar
Niet beschikbaar
-
i-Size
-
ISOFIX
-
Kinderzitje met universele gordel
Probleemloze montage
montage met beleid
kritisch veiligheidsprobleem
montage niet toegestaan
Positie stoel | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Voor | 2e rij | |||
Passagier | Links | Midden | Rechts | |
Maxi Cosi 2way Pearl & 2wayFix (rearward) (iSize) | ||||
Maxi Cosi 2way Pearl & 2wayFix (forward) (iSize) | ||||
BeSafe iZi Kid X2 i-Size (iSize) | ||||
BeSafe iZi Flex FIT i-Size (iSize) | ||||
Maxi Cosi Cabriofix & FamilyFix (ISOFIX) | ||||
BeSafe iZi Kid X4 ISOfix (ISOFIX) | ||||
Britax Römer Duo Plus (ISOFIX) | ||||
Britax Römer KidFix XP (ISOFIX) | ||||
Maxi Cosi Cabriofix (Belt) | ||||
Maxi Cosi Cabriofix & EasyBase2 (Belt) | ||||
Britax Römer King II LS (Belt) | ||||
Britax Römer KidFix XP (Belt) |
Probleemloze montage
montage met beleid
kritisch veiligheidsprobleem
montage niet toegestaan
In the frontal offset test, protection of both child occupants was good or adequate with the exception of the neck of the 10 year dummy, for which readings of neck tension indicated weak protection. In the side barrier test, protection of the 10 year old's head was rated as weak on the basis of the decelerations measured there. Otherwise, protection was good. The front passenger airbag can be disabled to allow a rearward-facing child restraint to be used in that seating position. Clear information is provided to the driver regarding the status of the airbag and the system was rewarded. All of the child restraint types for which the HS is designed could be properly installed and accommodated in the car.
- Goed
- Voldoende
- Twijfelachtig
- Zwak
- Slecht

Impact op het hoofd 15,9 Ptn
Impact op het bekken 1,1 Ptn
Impact op de benen 5,5 Ptn
Systeemnaam | Automatic Emergency Braking System for Pedestrians | |||
Type | Auto-Brake with Forward Collision Warning | |||
In werking vanaf | 4 km/u | |||
Resultaat | | ||||
Auto-brakefunctie |
-
Fietser steekt over
-
Fietser langs de weg
The bonnet provided predominantly good or adequate protection to the head of a struck pedestrian, with only a few poor results on the stiff windscreen pillars. The bumper provided good or adequate protection to pedestrians' legs at most test locations. However, protection of the pelvis area was mixed. The AEB system of the HS can detect vulnerable road users like pedestrians and cyclists, as well as other vehicles. In tests of the its response to pedestrians, the system performed well and, against cyclists, it performed adequately.
- Goed
- Voldoende
- Twijfelachtig
- Zwak
- Slecht
Systeemnaam | Speed Assistance System |
Snelheidsbegrenzings-informatiefunctie | Camera based |
Snelheidsregelingsfunctie | System advised (accurate to 5km/h) |
Geldt voor | All Seats | ||
Waarschuwing | Bestuurdersstoel | Passagier(s) vooraan | Passagier(s) achteraan |
Visueel | |||
Hoorbaar | |||
Detectie inzittenden | |||
|
Systeemnaam | Lane Depature Prevention System |
Type | LKA (including LDW) |
In werking vanaf | 60 km/u |
Resultaat | |
Lane Keep Assist | |
Mens-Machine-Interactie |
Systeemnaam | Forward Collision Warning System&Automatic Emergency Braking System | |||
Type | Autonomous Emergency Braking and Forward Collision Warning | |||
In werking vanaf | 4 km/u | |||
Extra informatie | Supplementary warning |
The HS has a seatbelt reminder for the front and rear seats. A speed assistance system uses a camera to determine the local speed limit. This information is presented to the driver who can set the limiter to the appropriate speed. A lane support system helps to prevent inadvertent drifting out of lane. During tests of the AEB system against another vehicle at highway speeds, low-speed impacts with the target meant that the radar had to be re-aligned and the system re-set several times. Such repeated activation of the AEB system and impact with a target is unrepresentative of the real world and the performance of the system was rated as good, with collisions avoided or mitigated in most circumstances.
- Specificaties
- Veiligheidsuitrusting
- Video's
- Geldigheid van de beoordeling
Specificaties
Getest model MG HS 1.5 petrol, RHD
Type carrosserie - 5 door SUV
Bouwjaar 2019
Leeggewicht 1489kg
VIN vanaf welke de beoordeling van toepassing is - all HS variants
Klasse Kleine SUV
Veiligheidsuitrusting
Opmerking: het voertuig is mogelijk uitgerust met andere voorzieningen maar deze zijn niet meegenomen in het testjaar.
Standaard uitrusting
Uitrusting als onderdeel van het veiligheidspakket
Niet aanwezig op het testvoertuig maar beschikbaar als optie of als onderdeel van het veiligheidspakket
Niet beschikbaar
Niet van toepassing
Video's
Geldigheid van de beoordeling
Modellenreeks varianten
Body Type | Engine | Model Name/Code | Drivetrain | Rating Applies | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
LHD | RHD | ||||
5 door SUV | 1.5 turbo petrol* |
'Explore' |
4 x 2 | N/A | ![]() |
* Tested variant








Meer informatie vindt u in de sectie Opmerkingen van de beoordeling

The passenger compartment of the HS remained stable in the frontal offset test. Dummy readings indicated good protection of the knees and femurs of both the driver and passenger. MG showed that, with the exception of the underside of the steering column, a similar level of protection would be provided to occupants of different sizes and to those sitting in different positions. In the full-width rigid barrier test, protection of the driver was good for all critical parts of the body, and was good or adequate for the rear passenger. In the side barrier impact, all critical body areas were well protected and the HS scored maximum points in this test. In the more severe side pole test, protection of the chest was rated as weak, based on dummy readings of rib compression, while that of other body areas was good. Tests on the front seats and head restraints demonstrated good protection against whiplash injuries in the event of a rear-end collision. A geometric assessment of the rear seats also indicated good whiplash protection. The standard-fit autonomous emergency braking (AEB) system performed well in tests of its functionality at the low speeds, typical of city driving, at which many whiplash injuries occur, with collisions avoided in all test scenarios.