- With standard equipment
- With safety pack
Meer informatie vindt u in de sectie Opmerkingen van de beoordeling
Meer informatie vindt u in het tabblad Geldigheid van de beoordeling
- Lees meer
- Lees meer
- Lees meer
- Lees meer
- Goed
- Voldoende
- Twijfelachtig
- Zwak
- Slecht








-
Naderen van een stilstaande auto: Offset links
-
Naderen van een stilstaande auto: Geen offset
-
Naderen van een stilstaande auto: Offset rechts
- Goed
- Voldoende
- Twijfelachtig
- Zwak
- Slecht


Passagier
(buitenste zitplaatsen)
Midden
Standaard uitrusting
Niet aanwezig op het testvoertuig, maar als optie verkrijgbaar
Niet beschikbaar
-
i-Size
-
ISOFIX
-
Kinderzitje met universele gordel
Probleemloze montage
montage met beleid
kritisch veiligheidsprobleem
montage niet toegestaan
Positie stoel | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Voor | 2e rij | |||
Passagier | Links | Midden | Rechts | |
Maxi Cosi 2way Pearl & 2wayFix (rearward) (iSize) | ||||
Maxi Cosi 2way Pearl & 2wayFix (forward) (iSize) | ||||
BeSafe iZi Kid X2 i-Size (iSize) | ||||
BeSafe iZi Flex FIX i-Size (iSize) | ||||
Maxi Cosi Cabriofix & FamilyFix (ISOFIX) | ||||
BeSafe iZi Kid X4 ISOfix (ISOFIX) | ||||
Britax Römer Duo Plus (ISOFIX) | ||||
Britax Römer KidFix XP (ISOFIX) | ||||
Maxi Cosi Cabriofix (Belt) | ||||
Maxi Cosi Cabriofix & EasyBase2 (Belt) | ||||
Britax Römer King II LS (Belt) | ||||
Britax Römer KidFix XP (Belt) |
Probleemloze montage
montage met beleid
kritisch veiligheidsprobleem
montage niet toegestaan
In the frontal offset test, dummy readings of neck tension in the 10-year dummy indicated poor protection of this body area. Otherwise, protection was good. For the 6-year dummy, protection of the neck was marginal. In the side barrier test, protection of both child dummies was good. The front passenger airbag can be disabled to allow a rearward-facing child restraint to be used in this seating position. Clear information is provided to the driver regarding the status of the airbag and the system was rewarded. All of the restraint types for which the G-Class is designed could be properly installed and accommodated.
- Goed
- Voldoende
- Twijfelachtig
- Zwak
- Slecht

Impact op het hoofd 15,1 Ptn
Impact op het bekken 5,9 Ptn
Impact op de benen 6,0 Ptn
Systeemnaam | Active Brake Assist | |||
Type | Auto-Brake with Forward Collision Warning | |||
In werking vanaf | 10 km/u | |||
Resultaat | | ||||
Auto-brakefunctie |
-
Fietser steekt over
-
Fietser langs de weg
The protection provided by the bonnet to the head of a struck pedestrian was marginal or adequate over most of its surface, with areas of good and poor performance. Protection of pedestrian's legs was good or adequate, as was the protection offered to the pelvis. The AEB system can detect pedestrians and cyclists, as well as other vehicles. The system performed well when tested for its reaction to vulnerable road users such as these.
- Goed
- Voldoende
- Twijfelachtig
- Zwak
- Slecht
Systeemnaam | Speed Limit Assist |
Snelheidsbegrenzings-informatiefunctie | Camera & Map |
Snelheidsregelingsfunctie | System advised (accurate to 5km/h) |
Geldt voor | Not available | ||
Waarschuwing | Bestuurdersstoel | Passagier(s) vooraan | Passagier(s) achteraan |
Visueel | |||
Hoorbaar | |||
Detectie inzittenden | |||
|
Systeemnaam | Active Lane Keeping Assist |
Type | LKA (including LDW) and ELK |
In werking vanaf | 60 km/u |
Resultaat | |
Emergency Lane Keeping | |
Lane Keep Assist | |
Mens-Machine-Interactie |
Systeemnaam | Active Brake Assist | |||
Type | Autonomous Emergency Braking and Forward Collision Warning | |||
In werking vanaf | 7 km/u | |||
Extra informatie | Restraint activation |
The AEB system gave generally good results in tests of its functionality at highway speeds. The car has a lane assistance system which helps prevent inadvertent drifting out of lane but can also intervene in some more critical situations. The speed control system uses digital mapping combined with a camera to identify what the local speed limit is and to inform the driver, who can then set the limiter to the appropriate speed. A seatbelt reminder is standard for front and rear seats.
- Specificaties
- Veiligheidsuitrusting
- Video's
- Geldigheid van de beoordeling
Specificaties
Getest model Mercedes-Benz G350d, LHD
Type carrosserie - 5 door SUV
Bouwjaar 2019
Leeggewicht 2451kg
VIN vanaf welke de beoordeling van toepassing is - all G-Class
Klasse Grote SUV
Veiligheidsuitrusting
Opmerking: het voertuig is mogelijk uitgerust met andere voorzieningen maar deze zijn niet meegenomen in het testjaar.
Standaard uitrusting
Uitrusting als onderdeel van het veiligheidspakket
Niet aanwezig op het testvoertuig maar beschikbaar als optie of als onderdeel van het veiligheidspakket
Niet beschikbaar
Niet van toepassing
Video's
Geldigheid van de beoordeling
Modellenreeks varianten
Body Type | Engine | Model Name/Code | Drivetrain | Rating Applies | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
LHD | RHD | ||||
5 door SUV | 3.0 diesel | G350d* | 4 x 4 | ![]() |
![]() |
5 door SUV | 4.0 petrol | G500 | 4 x 4 | ![]() |
![]() |
5 door SUV | 4.0 petrol | G63 | 4 x 4 | ![]() |
![]() |
* Tested variant










Meer informatie vindt u in de sectie Opmerkingen van de beoordeling

The passenger compartment of the G-Class remained stable in the frontal offset test. Dummy readings indicated good protection of the knees and femurs of the driver and passenger. Mercedes-Benz showed that a similar level of protection would be provided to occupants of different sizes and to those sitting in different positions. Chest compression in the driver dummy indicated weak protection of this body region. In the full-width rigid barrier test, chest protection was marginal for the driver's chest but was good for all other critical body areas. For the rear dummy, dummy readings of chest compression indicated marginal protection. However, a high load in the shoulder belt pointed to a risk of injury which the dummy is not able to measure, and protection of the chest was penalised and downrated to 'weak'. In both the side barrier test and the side pole impact, protection of all critical body areas was good and the G-Class scored maximum points. Tests on the front seats and head restraints demonstrated good protection against whiplash injury in the event of a rear-end collision. A geometric assessment of the rear seats indicated marginal whiplash protection. The standard-fit autonomous emergency braking (AEB) system performed well in tests at the low speeds, typical of city driving, at which many whiplash injuries are caused.