Find more information in the General Comments section of the assessment
Find more information in the Rating Validity tab of the assessment
-
See More
![]()
83% -
See More
![]()
67% -
See More
![]()
51% -
See More
![]()
71%
- Good
- Adequate
- Marginal
- Weak
- Poor
Passenger
Driver
Front Seat
Car
Pole
- Good
- Adequate
- Marginal
- Weak
- Poor
Passenger
outboard
center
![]()
Fitted to the vehicle as standard![]()
Not fitted to the test vehicle but available as option![]()
Not Available
Not fitted to the test vehicle but available as optionBased on dummy readings in the frontal and side impact tests, the 18 month old child offered only adequate protection to the neck and chest. However, poor protection was offered to the chest of the 3 year old child. The passenger airbag could not be deactivated to allow for placement of a rearward facing child restraint on the front passenger seat. Permanently attached labels on the sun visor clearly warn of the dangers of using a rearward facing child seat in that position without first disabling the airbag.
- Good
- Adequate
- Marginal
- Weak
- Poor
Head Impact 12.4 Pts
Pelvis Impact 0.0 Pts
Leg Impact 6.0 Pts
In those areas likely to be struck by a pedestrian's lower leg, the protection was good. The front edge of the bonnet offered poor protection, which is where a pedestrian's upper leg would contact. In most areas likely to be struck by the head of a child and an adult, the protection was mostly marginal and poor.
- Good
- Adequate
- Marginal
- Weak
- Poor
| System Name | ESC | |
| Performance | ||
| Vehicle Yaw Rate @ COS + 1.00 s | 2.8% | meets ECE requirements |
| Vehicle Yaw Rate @ COS + 1.75 s | 2.1% | meets ECE requirements |
| Lateral Displacement @ BOS + 1.07 s | 2.38 m | meets ECE requirements |
| Applies To | Front seats | ||
| Warning | Driver Seat | Front Passenger(s) | Rear Passenger(s) |
| Visual | |
|
 |
| Audible | |
|
|
|
|||
FailElectronic stability control is standard and met Euro NCAP's requirements. There is a seatbelt reminder system for the driver and passenger, but not for the rear seats. The Isuzu D-max is not available with a speed limitation device.
- Specifications
- Safety Equipment
- Videos
- Rating Validity
Specifications
Tested Model Isuzu D-MAX Crew Cab, 2.5 diesel, RHD
Body Type - 4 door pickup
Year Of Publication 2012
Kerb Weight 1960kg
VIN From Which Rating Applies - applies to all D-MAX of the specification tested
Class Pickup Truck
Safety Equipment
Note: Other equipment may be available on the vehicle but was not considered in the test year.
![]()
Fitted to the vehicle as standard![]()
Fitted to the vehicle as option![]()
Not fitted to the test vehicle but available as option![]()
Not Available![]()
Not Applicable
Fitted to the vehicle as optionVideos
Rating Validity
Find more information in the General Comments section of the assessment
Share
The passenger compartment remained stable in the frontal impact. Dummy readings indicated only marginal protection for the driver's chest, knees and lower legs. The Isuzu D-max scored maximum points for the protection it provided in the side barrier test. The front seat and head restraint provided good protection against whiplash injuries in a rear-end collision.