- With standard equipment
- With safety pack
Meer informatie vindt u in de sectie Opmerkingen van de beoordeling
Meer informatie vindt u in het tabblad Geldigheid van de beoordeling
- Lees meer
- Lees meer
- Lees meer
- Lees meer
- Goed
- Voldoende
- Twijfelachtig
- Zwak
- Slecht








-
Naderen van een stilstaande auto: Offset links
-
Naderen van een stilstaande auto: Geen offset
-
Naderen van een stilstaande auto: Offset rechts
- Goed
- Voldoende
- Twijfelachtig
- Zwak
- Slecht


Passagier
(buitenste zitplaatsen)
Midden
(buitenste zitplaatsen) *
Standaard uitrusting
Niet aanwezig op het testvoertuig, maar als optie verkrijgbaar
Niet beschikbaar
-
i-Size
-
ISOFIX
-
Kinderzitje met universele gordel
Probleemloze montage
montage met beleid
kritisch veiligheidsprobleem
montage niet toegestaan
Positie stoel | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Voor | 2e rij | 3e rij | ||||
Passagier | Links | Midden | Rechts | Links | Rechts | |
Maxi Cosi 2way Pearl & 2wayFix (rearward) (iSize) | ||||||
Maxi Cosi 2way Pearl & 2wayFix (forward) (iSize) | ||||||
BeSafe iZi Kid X2 i-Size (iSize) | ||||||
BeSafe iZi Flex FIX i-Size (iSize) | ||||||
Maxi Cosi Cabriofix & FamilyFix (ISOFIX) | ||||||
BeSafe iZi Kid X4 ISOfix (ISOFIX) | ||||||
Britax Römer Duo Plus (ISOFIX) | ||||||
Britax Römer KidFix XP (ISOFIX) | ||||||
Maxi Cosi Cabriofix (Belt) | ||||||
Maxi Cosi Cabriofix & EasyBase2 (Belt) | ||||||
Britax Römer King II LS (Belt) | ||||||
Britax Römer KidFix XP (Belt) |
Probleemloze montage
montage met beleid
kritisch veiligheidsprobleem
montage niet toegestaan
In the frontal offset test, dummy readings of tensile forces indicated marginal protection of the neck for the 10-year dummy. Otherwise, protection of both dummies was good or adequate. In the side barrier test, protection of both child dummies was good and maximum points were scored. The front passenger airbag can be disabled to allow a rearward-facing child restraint to be used in this seating position. Clear information is provided to the driver regarding the status of the airbag and the system was rewarded. All of the restraint types for which the CR-V is designed could be properly installed and accommodated, including in the optional third row seats.
- Goed
- Voldoende
- Twijfelachtig
- Zwak
- Slecht

Impact op het hoofd 16,8 Ptn
Impact op het bekken 3,0 Ptn
Impact op de benen 6,0 Ptn
Systeemnaam | Collision Mitigation Brake System | |||
Type | Auto-Brake with Forward Collision Warning | |||
In werking vanaf | 5 km/u | |||
Resultaat | | ||||
Auto-brakefunctie |
-
Fietser steekt over
-
Fietser langs de weg
The protection provided by the bonnet to the head of a struck pedestrian was good or adequate over most of its surface, with areas of good and poor performance. Protection of pedestrian's legs was good in all test areas and the CR-V scored maximum points. Protection of pelvis was mixed. The AEB system can detect pedestrians and cyclists, as well as other vehicles. The system performed well in pedestrian tests but was marginal in the more severe cyclist tests.
- Goed
- Voldoende
- Twijfelachtig
- Zwak
- Slecht
Systeemnaam | Intelligent Speed Limiter |
Snelheidsbegrenzings-informatiefunctie | Camera based |
Snelheidsregelingsfunctie | System advised (accurate to 5km/h) |
Geldt voor | Not available | ||
Waarschuwing | Bestuurdersstoel | Passagier(s) vooraan | Passagier(s) achteraan |
Visueel | |||
Hoorbaar | |||
Detectie inzittenden | |||
|
Systeemnaam | Road Departure Mitigation |
Type | LKA (including LDW) |
In werking vanaf | 72 km/u |
Resultaat | |
Lane Keep Assist | |
Mens-Machine-Interactie |
Systeemnaam | Collision Mitigation Brake System | |||
Type | Autonomous Emergency Braking and Forward Collision Warning | |||
In werking vanaf | 5 km/u | |||
Extra informatie | Supplementary warning and Restraint activation |
The AEB system gave generally good results in tests of its functionality at highway speeds. The car has a lane assistance system which helps prevent inadvertent drifting out of lane. A camera-based speed assistance system recognises local speed limits and presents the information to the driver, allowing the limiter to be manually set to the appropriate speed. A seatbelt reminder is standard for front and rear seats.
- Specificaties
- Veiligheidsuitrusting
- Video's
- Geldigheid van de beoordeling
Specificaties
Getest model Honda CR-V 2.0 Hybrid, LHD
Type carrosserie - 5 door SUV
Bouwjaar 2019
Leeggewicht 1612kg
VIN vanaf welke de beoordeling van toepassing is - all CR-Vs
Klasse Grote SUV
Veiligheidsuitrusting
Opmerking: het voertuig is mogelijk uitgerust met andere voorzieningen maar deze zijn niet meegenomen in het testjaar.
Standaard uitrusting
Uitrusting als onderdeel van het veiligheidspakket
Niet aanwezig op het testvoertuig maar beschikbaar als optie of als onderdeel van het veiligheidspakket
Niet beschikbaar
Niet van toepassing
Video's
Geldigheid van de beoordeling
Modellenreeks varianten
Body Type | Engine | Drivetrain | Rating Applies | |
---|---|---|---|---|
LHD | RHD | |||
5 door SUV | 1.5 petrol | 4 x 2 | ![]() |
![]() |
5 door SUV | 1.5 petrol | 4 x 4 | ![]() |
![]() |
5 door SUV | 2.0 petrol hybrid* | 4 x 2 | ![]() |
![]() |
5 door SUV | 2.0 petrol hybrid | 4 x 4 | ![]() |
![]() |
* Tested variant




Meer informatie vindt u in de sectie Opmerkingen van de beoordeling

The passenger compartment of the CR-V remained stable in the frontal offset test. Dummy readings indicated good protection of the knees and femurs of the driver and passenger. Honda showed that a similar level of protection would be provided to occupants of different sizes and to those sitting in different positions. Protection of the passenger dummy was good for all critical body areas. In the full-width rigid barrier test, protection of the driver and rear passenger was good or adequate for all critical body areas. In the side barrier test, protection of all critical body areas was good and the CR-V scored maximum points. In the more severe side pole impact, dummy readings of rib deflection indicated marginal protection of the chest. Tests on the front seats and head restraints demonstrated good protection against whiplash injury in the event of a rear-end collision. However, a geometric assessment of the rear seats indicated poor whiplash protection. The standard-fit autonomous emergency braking (AEB) system performed well in tests at the low speeds, typical of city driving, at which many whiplash injuries are caused.