- With standard equipment
- With safety pack
Meer informatie vindt u in de sectie Opmerkingen van de beoordeling
Meer informatie vindt u in het tabblad Geldigheid van de beoordeling
- Lees meer
- Lees meer
- Lees meer
- Lees meer
- Goed
- Voldoende
- Twijfelachtig
- Zwak
- Slecht


- Goed
- Voldoende
- Twijfelachtig
- Zwak
- Slecht


Passagier
(buitenste zitplaatsen)
Midden
Standaard uitrusting
Niet aanwezig op het testvoertuig, maar als optie verkrijgbaar
Niet beschikbaar
-
i-Size
-
ISOFIX
-
Kinderzitje met universele gordel
Probleemloze montage
montage met beleid
kritisch veiligheidsprobleem
montage niet toegestaan
Positie stoel | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Voor | 2e rij | |||
Passagier | Links | Midden | Rechts | |
Maxi Cosi 2way Pearl & 2wayFix (i-Size) | ||||
Maxi Cosi 2way Pearl & 2wayFix (i-Size) | ||||
BeSafe iZi Kid X2 i-Size (i-Size) | ||||
Britax Römer TriFix2 i-Size (i-Size) | ||||
BeSafe iZi Flex FIX i-Size (i-Size) | ||||
BeSafe iZi Combi X4 ISOfix (ISOFIX) | ||||
Cybex Solution Z i-Fix (ISOFIX) | ||||
Maxi Cosi Cabriofix (Belt) | ||||
Maxi Cosi Cabriofix & Easyfix (Belt) | ||||
Britax Römer King II LS (Belt) | ||||
Cybex Solution Z i-Fix (Belt) |
Probleemloze montage
montage met beleid
kritisch veiligheidsprobleem
montage niet toegestaan
In the frontal offset test, protection of the chest and neck of the 10 year dummy was rated as weak, based on dummy readings during the impact. For the 6 year dummy, protection of the neck was marginal while that of the head and chest was adequate and good respectively. The front passenger airbag can be disabled to allow a rearward-facing child restraint to be used in that seating position. Clear information is provided to the driver regarding the status of the airbag and the system was rewarded. All of the child restraints for which the car is designed could be properly installed and accommodated. One, a full sized rearward facing toddler restraint, could be fitted in the car with no problem but was deemed a fail because Dacia indicate in the user manual that the car cannot accommodate this (R3) category of restraint.
- Goed
- Voldoende
- Twijfelachtig
- Zwak
- Slecht

Impact op het hoofd 14,1 Ptn
Impact op het bekken 2,3 Ptn
Impact op de benen 5,8 Ptn
The protection provided by the bonnet to the head of a struck pedestrian was predominantly good or adequate with poor results recorded at the base of the windscreen and on the stiff windscreen pillars. The bumper provided good or adequate protection to pedestrians' legs at all test locations. However, protection of the pelvis was poor over much of the width of the car. The autonomous emergency braking (AEB) system does not detect vulnerable road users such as pedestrians and cyclists.
- Goed
- Voldoende
- Twijfelachtig
- Zwak
- Slecht
Systeemnaam | Speed limiter |
Snelheidsregelingsfunctie | Manually set (accurate to 5km/h) |
Geldt voor | Front and rear seats, including third row | ||
Waarschuwing | Bestuurdersstoel | Passagier(s) vooraan | Passagier(s) achteraan |
Visueel | |||
Hoorbaar | |||
Detectie inzittenden | |||
|
Systeemnaam | Active Emergency Braking | |||
Type | Autonomous emergency braking and forward collision warning | |||
In werking vanaf | 7 km/u | |||
Gebruikte sensor | Radar only |
A seatbelt reminder system is standard for the front and rear seats. A driver-set speed limiter is also standard but there is no lane assistance. The AEB system performed well in tests of its response to other vehicles with accidents avoided or mitigated in many cases.
- Specificaties
- Veiligheidsuitrusting
- Video's
- Geldigheid van de beoordeling
Specificaties
Getest model Dacia Sandero Stepway 1.0TCe, LHD
Type carrosserie - 5 door hatchback
Bouwjaar 2021
Leeggewicht 1111kg
VIN vanaf welke de beoordeling van toepassing is - all Logans
Klasse Kleine gezinsauto
Veiligheidsuitrusting
Opmerking: het voertuig is mogelijk uitgerust met andere voorzieningen maar deze zijn niet meegenomen in het testjaar.
Standaard uitrusting
Uitrusting als onderdeel van het veiligheidspakket
Niet aanwezig op het testvoertuig maar beschikbaar als optie of als onderdeel van het veiligheidspakket
Niet beschikbaar
Niet van toepassing
Video's
Geldigheid van de beoordeling
Modellenreeks varianten
Body Type | Engine & Transmission | Drivetrain | Rating Applies | |
---|---|---|---|---|
LHD | RHD | |||
4 door saloon | 1.0 SCe petrol, manual | 4 x 2 | ![]() |
- |
4 door saloon | 1.0 TCe petrol, manual | 4 x 2 | ![]() |
- |
4 door saloon | 1.0 TCe petrol, automatic | 4 x 2 | ![]() |
- |
4 door saloon | 1.0 LPG, manual | 4 x 2 | ![]() |
- |
Tested car: Dacia Sandero Stepway


Meer informatie vindt u in de sectie Opmerkingen van de beoordeling
The Dacia Logan is structurally identical to the Sandero Stepway but has a different roof-line towards the rear. Based on some additional tests and data reviewed by Euro NCAP, the star rating of the Sandero Stepway can be applied also to the Dacia Logan.

The passenger compartment remained stable in the frontal offset test. Dummy readings indicated protection that was at least adequate for the knees and femurs of the driver and passenger. However, structures in the dashboard presented a risk of injury to occupants of different sizes and to those sitting in different positions, and protection for this part of the body was downgraded to marginal. Chest protection was also rated as marginal for both front seat occupants, based on dummy readings of chest compression. Analysis of the deformable barrier after the test revealed that it would be a benign crash opponent. In the full-width rigid barrier test, protection of the front seat driver and rear seat passenger was at least adequate for all critical parts of the body. In the side barrier test, representing an impact by another vehicle, chest compression indicated a marginal level of protection. In the side pole test, protection of all critical body areas was rated as good or adequate. An assessment of the excursion of an occupant in a far-side impact showed poor protection and the car does not have a counter-measure, such as a centre airbag, for this accident type. Tests on the front seats and head restraints demonstrated good protection against whiplash injuries in the event of a rear-end collision. However, a geometric analysis of the rear seats indicated marginal whiplash protection.