- With standard equipment
- With safety pack
Meer informatie vindt u in de sectie Opmerkingen van de beoordeling
Meer informatie vindt u in het tabblad Geldigheid van de beoordeling
- Lees meer
- Lees meer
- Lees meer
- Lees meer
- Goed
- Voldoende
- Twijfelachtig
- Zwak
- Slecht


- Goed
- Voldoende
- Twijfelachtig
- Zwak
- Slecht


Passagier
(buitenste zitplaatsen)
Midden
Standaard uitrusting
Niet aanwezig op het testvoertuig, maar als optie verkrijgbaar
Niet beschikbaar
-
i-Size
-
ISOFIX
-
Kinderzitje met universele gordel
Probleemloze montage
montage met beleid
kritisch veiligheidsprobleem
montage niet toegestaan
Positie stoel | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Voor | 2e rij | |||
Passagier | Links | Midden | Rechts | |
Maxi Cosi 2way Pearl & 2wayFix (i-Size) | ||||
Maxi Cosi 2way Pearl & 2wayFix (i-Size) | ||||
BeSafe iZi Kid X2 i-Size (i-Size) | ||||
Britax Römer TriFix2 i-Size (i-Size) | ||||
BeSafe iZi Flex FIX i-Size (i-Size) | ||||
BeSafe iZi Combi X4 ISOfix (ISOFIX) | ||||
Cybex Solution Z i-Fix (ISOFIX) | ||||
Maxi Cosi Cabriofix (Belt) | ||||
Maxi Cosi Cabriofix & EasyFix (Belt) | ||||
Britax Römer King II LS (Belt) | ||||
Cybex Solution Z i-Fix (Belt) |
Probleemloze montage
montage met beleid
kritisch veiligheidsprobleem
montage niet toegestaan
In the frontal offset test, protection of the neck of the 10 year dummy was rated as marginal, based on readings of tensile forces. Otherwise, protection of the 10 and 6 year dummies was good or adequate. In the side barrier impact, protection of all critical body areas was good for both child dummies. The front passenger airbag can be disabled to allow a rearward-facing child restraint to be used in that seating position. Clear information is provided to the driver regarding the status of the airbag and the system was rewarded. All of the child restraint types for which the C4 is designed could be properly installed and accommodated.
- Goed
- Voldoende
- Twijfelachtig
- Zwak
- Slecht

Impact op het hoofd 15,3 Ptn
Impact op het bekken 6,0 Ptn
Impact op de benen 6,0 Ptn
Systeemnaam | Active Safety Brake | |||
Type | Auto-Brake with Forward Collision Warning | |||
In werking vanaf | 10 km/u | |||
Resultaat | | ||||
Auto-brakefunctie |
The protection provided by the bonnet to the head of a struck pedestrian was predominantly good or adequate over the bonnet surface but tests on areas around the base of the windscreen and on the stiff windscreen pillars indicated poor protection. The bumper provided good protection to pedestrians’ legs and the pelvis area was also well protected, the C4 scoring maximum points in both of these areas. The autonomous emergency braking (AEB) system of the C4 detects some vulnerable road users as well as other vehicles. In tests of its response to pedestrians, the AEB system showed marginal performance, with avoidance or mitigation only in some of the test scenarios.
- Goed
- Voldoende
- Twijfelachtig
- Zwak
- Slecht
Systeemnaam | Speed Limit Sign Recognition & Recommendation |
Snelheidsbegrenzings-informatiefunctie | Camera based, subsigns supported |
Snelheidsregelingsfunctie | System advised (accurate to 5km/h) |
Geldt voor | Front and rear seats, including third row | ||
Waarschuwing | Bestuurdersstoel | Passagier(s) vooraan | Passagier(s) achteraan |
Visueel | |||
Hoorbaar | |||
Detectie inzittenden | |||
|
Systeemnaam | Driver Attention Warning |
Type | Steering input and standard deviation of lane positioning |
In werking vanaf | 65 km/u |
Systeemnaam | Lane Keeping Assist |
Type | LKA and ELK |
In werking vanaf | 65 km/u |
Resultaat | |
Emergency Lane Keeping | |
Lane Keep Assist | |
Mens-Machine-Interactie |
Systeemnaam | Active Safety Brake | |||
Type | Autonomous emergency braking and forward collision warning | |||
In werking vanaf | 10 km/u | |||
Gebruikte sensor | camera only |
The C4 is equipped as standard with a seatbelt reminder system for front and rear seats. A camera-based speed limit recognition system advises the driver of the local speed limit, allowing the speed limiter to be set appropriately. Lane support is provided by ‘Lane Keep Assist’ which corrects the course of a vehicle which is drifting out of lane and also intervenes in some more critical situations. The autonomous emergency braking (AEB) system performed adequately in tests of its recognition and response to other vehicles.
- Specificaties
- Veiligheidsuitrusting
- Video's
- Geldigheid van de beoordeling
Specificaties
Getest model Citroën C4 1.2 petrol 'Feel Pack', LHD
Type carrosserie - 5 door hatchback
Bouwjaar 2021
Leeggewicht 1305kg
VIN vanaf welke de beoordeling van toepassing is - all C4 and C4X
Klasse Kleine gezinsauto
Veiligheidsuitrusting
Opmerking: het voertuig is mogelijk uitgerust met andere voorzieningen maar deze zijn niet meegenomen in het testjaar.
Standaard uitrusting
Uitrusting als onderdeel van het veiligheidspakket
Niet aanwezig op het testvoertuig maar beschikbaar als optie of als onderdeel van het veiligheidspakket
Niet beschikbaar
Niet van toepassing
Video's
Geldigheid van de beoordeling
Modellenreeks varianten
Body Type | Engine & Transmission | Model Name/Code | Drivetrain | Rating Applies | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
LHD | RHD | ||||
5 door hatchback | 1.2 petrol* | C4, C4X | 4 x 2 | ![]() |
![]() |
5 door hatchback | 1.5 diesel | C4, C4X | 4 x 2 | ![]() |
![]() |
5 door hatchback | pure electric | ë-C4, ë-C4X | 4 x 2 | ![]() |
![]() |
* Tested variant


Meer informatie vindt u in de sectie Opmerkingen van de beoordeling

The passenger compartment of the C4 remained stable in the frontal offset test. Dummy readings demonstrated good protection of the knees and femurs of both the driver and passenger dummies. Citroën showed that the same level of protection would be provided to the upper legs of occupants of different statures to the test dummy and to those sitting in different positions. However, dummy readings also indicated marginal protection of the front passenger's lower leg. Analysis of decelerations of the impact trolley and of the deformed impact barrier after the test indicated that the C4 would be a reasonably benign collision partner. In the full-width rigid barrier test, good or adequate protection was provided to all critical parts of the body. The C4 scored maximum points in both the side barrier and side pole impacts, with good protection of all critical body regions. The extent to which sideways excursion (movement of the occupant to the opposite side of the car) was mitigated was rated as [poor] [weak], and no counter-measure is fitted to prevent occupant to occupant injuries in side impacts. Tests on the front seats and head restraints demonstrated good protection against whiplash injuries in the event of a rear-end collision. A geometric analysis of the rear seats also indicated good whiplash protection. The C4 is equipped with 'In-Crash Braking', a system designed to prevent secondary impacts after a collision. However, the system did not meet Euro NCAP's requirements and was not rewarded.