-
Lees meer
![]()
71% -
Lees meer
![]()
75% -
Lees meer
![]()
54% -
Lees meer
![]()
33%
- Goed
- Voldoende
- Twijfelachtig
- Zwak
- Slecht
Passagier
Bestuurder
Zitplaats voor
Zitplaats achter
Auto
Paal
- Goed
- Voldoende
- Twijfelachtig
- Zwak
- Slecht
Passagier
(buitenste zitplaatsen)
Midden
![]()
In het voertuig als standaard![]()
Niet gemonteerd op het testvoertuig, maar als optie verkrijgbaar![]()
Niet beschikbaar
Niet gemonteerd op het testvoertuig, maar als optie verkrijgbaar-
Zuigelingen tot 13 kg
-
Zuigelingen en peuters tot 18 kg
-
Peuters van 9 tot 18 kg
-
Peuters meer dan 18 kg
![]()
Probleemloze montage![]()
montage met beleid![]()
kritisch veiligheidsprobleem![]()
montage niet toegestaan
montage met beleid
kritisch veiligheidsprobleem| Positie stoel | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Voor | 2e rij | |||
| Passagier | Links | Midden | Rechts | |
| Maxi Cosi Cabriofix (Belt) | |
|
|
|
| Römer King Plus (Belt) | |
|
|
|
| Römer Duo Plus (ISOFIX) | |
|
|
|
| Römer KidFix (Belt) | |
|
|
|
| Maxi Cosi Cabriofix & EasyFix (Belt) | |
|
|
|
| Maxi Cosi Cabriofix & EasyFix (ISOFIX) | |
|
|
|
| BeSafe iZi Kid X3 ISOfix (ISOFIX) | |
|
|
|
| Maxi Cosi Pearl & Familyfix (ISOFIX) | |
|
|
|
| Römer KidFix (ISOFIX) | |
|
|
|
![]()
Probleemloze montage![]()
montage met beleid![]()
kritisch veiligheidsprobleem![]()
montage niet toegestaan
In the frontal impact, forward movement of the 3 year dummy, sat in a forward-facing restraint, was not excessive but neck loads were quite high. Chest deceleration of the 1½ year dummy was also a little high and protection was rated as fair. In the side impact, both dummies were properly contained by the protective shells of their restraints, minimising the likelihood of head contact with pats of the car's interior. The front passenger airbag can be disabled to allow a rearward-facing child restraint to be used in that seating position. However, the switch, located at the end of the facia, is not labelled clearly enough and the system was not rewarded. All of the restraints which the car is designed to accommodate could be properly installed in the vehicle.
- Goed
- Voldoende
- Twijfelachtig
- Zwak
- Slecht
Impact op het hoofd 13.6 Ptn
Impact op het bekken 0 Ptn
Impact op de benen 6 Ptn
The protection provided by the bumper to pedestrians' legs was good in all areas tested. However, the front edge of the bonnet was poor and scored no points. The protection provided by the bonnet was predominantly good or adequate but was poor at the base of the windscreen and on the stiff windscreen pillars.
- Goed
- Voldoende
- Twijfelachtig
- Zwak
- Slecht
| Snelheidsbegrenzingsfunctie | Manually Set |
| Systeemnaam | ESP | |
| Resultaat | ||
| Geldt voor | Not available | ||
| Waarschuwing | Bestuurdersstoel | voorpassagier(s) | achterste passagier(s) |
| Visueel | |
 |
|
| Hoorbaar | |
|
|
|
|||
The C-Elysée has electronic stability control as standard. A seatbelt reminder is standard for the driver's seat but is not available for the passenger seat so the system was not rewarded. A driver-set speed limiter is available as an option. As it is fitted to most cars sold, it was assessed and met Euro NCAP's requirements for systems of this type. The C-Elysée is not available with lane assist or autonomous emergency braking.
- Specificaties
- Veiligheidsuitrusting
- Video's
- Jaarlijkse updates & facelifts
Specificaties
Getest model Citroën C-Elysée 1.2 Séduction, LHD
Type carrosserie - 4 door saloon
Bouwjaar 2014
Leeggewicht 1087kg
VIN vanaf welke de beoordeling van toepassing is - applies to all C-Elysées of the specification tested
Klasse Kleine gezinsauto
Veiligheidsuitrusting
Opmerking: het voertuig is mogelijk uitgerust met andere voorzieningen maar deze zijn niet meegenomen in het testjaar.
![]()
In het voertuig als standaard![]()
In het voertuig als optie![]()
Niet gemonteerd op het testvoertuig, maar als optie verkrijgbaar![]()
Niet beschikbaar![]()
Niet van toepassing
In het voertuig als optieVideo's
Jaarlijkse updates & facelifts
Delen
The passenger compartment of the C-Elysée remained stable in the frontal impact. Dummy readings indicated good protection of the knees and femurs of the driver and passenger in the test. However, structures in the dashboard posed a risk of injury to occupants of different sizes and to those sat in different positions and the score was downgraded. Readings of chest compression in the driver dummy indicated a marginal level of protection for this body region. In the side impact, protection of all body regions was good except for the abdomen, protection of which was adequate. However, in the more severe side pole impact, dummy readings of chest compression indicated a weak level of protection for this body region. The score was penalised because some forces were transmitted through parts of the dummy structure which would further load the chest of a human, and protection of the chest area was rated as poor. Protection against whiplash injury in a rear-end collision was good for the front seats but poor for the rear seats.