Ulteriori informazioni nella sezione Commenti generali della valutazione
Ulteriori informazioni nella scheda Validità della valutazione
-
See More
![]()
87% -
See More
![]()
91% -
See More
![]()
64% -
See More
![]()
78%
- Buona
- Adeguata
- Marginale
- Scarsa
- Insufficiente
Passeggero
Conducente
Sedile posteriore
Sedile anteriore
Vettura
Palo
- Buona
- Adeguata
- Marginale
- Scarsa
- Insufficiente
Passeggero
laterale
Centro
![]()
Montato di serie sul veicolo![]()
Non montato sul veicolo di prova, ma disponibile come opzione![]()
Non disponibile
The Proace scored maximum points for its protection of the 1½ year dummy in the full scale crash tests. In the frontal test, forward movement of the 3 year dummy, sat in a forward-facing restraint, was not excessive and protection was good apart from marginally raised neck tension. In the side barrier impact, both dummies were properly contained within the protective shells of their restraints, minimising the likelihood of head contact with parts of the vehicle interior. The front passenger airbag can be disabled to allow a rearward-facing restraint to be used in that seating position. Clear information is provided to the driver regarding the status of the airbag and the system was rewarded.
- Buona
- Adeguata
- Marginale
- Scarsa
- Insufficiente
Impatto testa 13,4 Pt
Impatto bacino 0,0 Pt
Impatto gambe 6,0 Pt
The bumper scored maximum points for its protection of pedestrians' legs. Euro NCAP does not perform tests to the front edge of the bonnet for vehicles in this category. The protection offered to the head of a struck pedestrian was mixed, with test results ranging from good to poor.
- Buona
- Adeguata
- Marginale
- Scarsa
- Insufficiente
| Nome sistema | ESP | |
| Prestazioni | ||
| Imbardata veicolo @ COS + 1.00 s | 17800% | conforme ai requisiti ECE |
| Imbardata veicolo @ COS + 1.75 s | 17200% | conforme ai requisiti ECE |
| Spostamento laterale @ BOS + 1.07 s | 2.57 m | conforme ai requisiti ECE |
| Si applica a | Driver's seat | ||
| Attenzione | Sedile conducente | passeggero(i) anteriore(i) | passeggero(i) posteriore(i) |
| Visivo | |
|
 |
| Acustico | |
|
|
|
|||
Non superatoThe Proace has electronic stability control as standard equipment, together with a seatbelt reminder for the driver and passenger seats. A driver-set speed limiter is also standard equipment.
- Specifiche
- Dotazione di sicurezza
- Video
- Validità della valutazione
Specifiche
Modello testato Peugeot Traveller 2.0 diesel, 'Navette', LHD
Tipo carrozzeria - Van
Anno di costruzione 2015
Peso a vuoto 1900kg
VIN a cui si riferisce la valutazione - All Toyota Proaces
Classe Furgone commerciale e familiare
Dotazione di sicurezza
Nota: altre dotazioni possono essere disponibili sul veicolo ma non sono state considerate nell'anno del test.
![]()
Montato di serie sul veicolo![]()
Montato sul veicolo come opzione![]()
Non montato sul veicolo di prova, ma disponibile come opzione![]()
Non disponibile![]()
Non applicabile
Montato sul veicolo come opzioneVideo
Validità della valutazione
Ulteriori informazioni nella sezione Commenti generali della valutazione
The Toyota Proace is identical to the Peugeot Traveller in all ways related to safety, including the fitment of safety equipment. Accordingly, the assessment of the Proace is based on tests conducted on the Peugeot Traveller.
Condividi
The passenger compartment remained stable in the frontal impact. Dummy readings indicated good protection of the knees and femurs of the driver and passenger. Toyota showed that a similar level of safety would be available to occupants of different sizes and to those sat in different positions. Currently, the full width rigid barrier test is not done on vehicles in the Business and Family Van category. In the side barrier test, the Proace scored maximum points, with good protection of all body areas. In the more severe side pole impact, dummy readings of rib compression indicated marginal chest protection but the protection of other body areas was rated as good. A geometric assessment indicated good whiplash protection for the front seat occupants but poor whiplash protection for those in the rear.