-
See More
![]()
90% -
See More
![]()
86% -
See More
![]()
53% -
See More
![]()
86%
- Buona
- Adeguata
- Marginale
- Scarsa
- Insufficiente
Passeggero
Conducente
Sedile anteriore
Vettura
Palo
- Buona
- Adeguata
- Marginale
- Scarsa
- Insufficiente
Passeggero
laterale
Centro
![]()
Montato di serie sul veicolo![]()
Non montato sul veicolo di prova, ma disponibile come opzione![]()
Non disponibile
Based only on the dummy responses in the tests, the car scored maximum points for protection of the 3 year infant. For the 1½ year old, Euro NCAP awards fewer points for a forward facing restraint than for a rearward facing one but the dummy readings were all good. The passenger airbag can be disabled to allow a rearward facing child restraint to be used in that seating position. Clear information is provided to the driver regarding the status of the airbag, essential to the safety of a child or adult occupant. Moreover, a clear warning is given of the dangers of using a rearward facing child restraint in that seating position without first disabling the airbag.
- Buona
- Adeguata
- Marginale
- Scarsa
- Insufficiente
Impatto testa 12.6 Pt
Impatto bacino 0.5 Pt
Impatto gambe 6 Pt
The bumper provided good protection to pedestrians' legs. In most areas likely to be hit by the head of a struck child, the bonnet was also rated as good. However, the bonnet provided predominantly poor protection to the head of a struck adult.
- Buona
- Adeguata
- Marginale
- Scarsa
- Insufficiente
| Nome sistema | ESP | |
| Prestazioni | ||
| Si applica a | All seats | ||
| Attenzione | Sedile conducente | passeggero(i) anteriore(i) | passeggero(i) posteriore(i) |
| Visivo |  |
|
|
| Acustico | |
|
|
|
|||
Non superatoElectronic Stability Control is at least an option on all variants throughout Europe and is expected to be standard equipment in the great majority of car sales. A seatbelt reminder system covering front and rear seats is standard equipment
- Specifiche
- Dotazione di sicurezza
- Video
- Validità della valutazione
Specifiche
Modello testato Toyota Avensis 2.0 D4-D, RHD
Tipo carrozzeria - 4 door saloon
Anno di costruzione 2009
Peso a vuoto 1531kg
VIN a cui si riferisce la valutazione - applies to all Avensis
Classe Familiare grande
Dotazione di sicurezza
Nota: altre dotazioni possono essere disponibili sul veicolo ma non sono state considerate nell'anno del test.
![]()
Montato di serie sul veicolo![]()
Montato sul veicolo come opzione![]()
Non montato sul veicolo di prova, ma disponibile come opzione![]()
Non disponibile![]()
Non applicabile
Montato sul veicolo come opzioneVideo
Validità della valutazione
Recensioni annuali e modelli affini
Condividi
The passenger compartment remained stable in the frontal test. Dummy readings showed good protection of the knees and femurs of both driver and passenger. Toyota showed that a similar level of protection would be provided to occupants of different sizes or those sat in different positions. The Avensis scored maximum points for all body regions in the side barrier test. In the side pole impact, the dummy was loaded in a way which is unrepresentative of a human and the car was penalised. Combined with the rib deflections measured in the test, protection of the chest in this test was rated as weak. However, protection against whiplash injuries was good.