- With standard equipment
- With safety pack
Ulteriori informazioni nella sezione Commenti generali della valutazione
Ulteriori informazioni nella scheda Validità della valutazione
- See More
- See More
- See More
- See More
- Buona
- Adeguata
- Marginale
- Scarsa
- Insufficiente


- Buona
- Adeguata
- Marginale
- Scarsa
- Insufficiente


Passeggero
laterale
Centro
Montato di serie sul veicolo
Non montato sul veicolo di prova, ma disponibile come opzione
Non disponibile
-
i-Size
-
ISOFIX
-
Sistema di ritenuta con ancoraggio a cinture di sicurezza universali
Installazione senza problemi
Installazione accurata
Problema per la sicurezza
Installazione non consentita
Sedile | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Anteriore | 2a fila | |||
Passeggero | Sinistra | Centro | Destra | |
Maxi Cosi 2way Pearl & 2wayFix (i-Size) | ||||
Maxi Cosi 2way Pearl & 2wayFix (i-Size) | ||||
BeSafe iZi Kid X2 i-Size (i-Size) | ||||
Britax Römer TriFix2 i-Size (i-Size) | ||||
BeSafe iZi Flex FIX i-Size (i-Size) | ||||
BeSafe iZi Combi X4 ISOfix (ISOFIX) | ||||
Cybex Solution Z i-Fix (ISOFIX) | ||||
Maxi Cosi Cabriofix (Belt) | ||||
Maxi Cosi Cabriofix & EasyFix (Belt) | ||||
Britax Römer King II LS (Belt) | ||||
Cybex Solution Z i-Fix (Belt) |
Installazione senza problemi
Installazione accurata
Problema per la sicurezza
Installazione non consentita
Apart from the head of the 10 year dummy in the side impact, protection of which was adequate, the car provided good protection of all critical body regions of both dummies in dynamic crash tests. The front passenger airbag can be disabled to allow a rearward-facing child restraint to be used in that seating position. All of the child restraint types for which the smart #1 is designed could be properly installed and accommodated.
- Buona
- Adeguata
- Marginale
- Scarsa
- Insufficiente

Impatto testa 14,9 Pt
Impatto bacino 2,1 Pt
Impatto gambe 6,0 Pt
Nome sistema | Collision Mitigation Support Front | |||
Tipo | Auto-Brake with Forward Collision Warning | |||
Operativo da | 4 Km/h | |||
Prestazioni | | ||||
Funzione freno automatico |
-
Ciclista proveniente da un lato, vista ostruita
-
Un ciclista attraversa la strada
-
Un ciclista pedala a bordo strada
Protection of the head of a struck pedestrian was predominantly good or adequate. The bumper offered good protection to pedestrians’ legs at all test locations but protection of the pelvis was predominantly weak or poor. The autonomous emergency braking (AEB) system of the smart can respond to vulnerable road users as well as to other vehicles. The system performed well in tests of its response to pedestrians and cyclists, with collisions avoided in most test scenarios.
- Buona
- Adeguata
- Marginale
- Scarsa
- Insufficiente
Nome sistema | Speed Limit Assist |
Funzione informazione limiti velocità | Camera based, subsigns supported |
Funzione controllo velocità | System advised (accurate to 5km/h) |
Si applica a | Front and rear seats | ||
Attenzione | Sedile conducente | passeggero(i) anteriore(i) | passeggero(i) posteriore(i) |
Visivo | |||
Acustico | |||
Rilevamento occupanti | |||
|
Nome sistema | Driver Performance State |
Tipo | Direct eye monitoring |
Operativo da | 8 km/h |
Nome sistema | Lane Keep Assist |
Tipo | LKA and ELK |
Operativo da | 60 km/h |
Prestazioni | |
Emergency Lane Keeping (ELK) | |
Lane Keep Assist (LKA) | |
Interfaccia uomo-macchina |
Nome sistema | Collision Mitigation Support Front | |||
Tipo | Autonomous emergency braking and forward collision warning | |||
Operativo da | 4 km/h | |||
Sensore utilizzato | camera and radar |
The smart’s autonomous emergency braking (AEB) system performed well in tests of its reaction to other vehicles. A seatbelt reminder system is fitted as standard to the front and rear seats and the car is equipped with a system to detect driver fatigue. The lane support system gently corrects the vehicle’s path if it is drifting out of lane, and also intervenes in some more critical situations. The car uses camera-based traffic sign recognition as part of its speed assistance system. However, that part of the system failed Euro NCAP's requirements and only the speed limiter itself was rewarded.
- Specifiche
- Dotazione di sicurezza
- Video
- Validità della valutazione
Specifiche
Modello testato smart #1
Tipo carrozzeria - 5 door SUV
Anno di costruzione 2022
Peso a vuoto 1820kg
VIN a cui si riferisce la valutazione - all smart #1
Classe Piccolo SUV
Dotazione di sicurezza
Nota: altre dotazioni possono essere disponibili sul veicolo ma non sono state considerate nell'anno del test.
Montato di serie sul veicolo
Montato sul veicolo come parte del Safety Pack
Non montato sulla vettura testata ma disponibile come opzione o come parte del Safety Pack
Non disponibile
Non applicabile
Video
Validità della valutazione
Varianti della gamma di modelli
Body Type | Engine | Model Name / Code | Drivetrain | Rating Applies | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
LHD | RHD | ||||
5 door SUV | Electric | Pure | 4 X 2 | ![]() |
![]() |
5 door SUV | Electric | Pro | 4 X 2 | ![]() |
![]() |
5 door SUV | Electric | Pure+ | 4 X 2 | ![]() |
![]() |
5 door SUV | Electric | Pro+ | 4 X 2 | ![]() |
![]() |
5 door SUV | Electric | Premium * | 4 X 2 | ![]() |
![]() |
5 door SUV | Electric | Launch Edition (Premium) | 4 X 2 | ![]() |
![]() |
5 door SUV | Electric | Pulse | 4 X 4 | ![]() |
![]() |
5 door SUV | Electric | BRABUS | 4 X 4 | ![]() |
![]() |
* Tested variant


Ulteriori informazioni nella sezione Commenti generali della valutazione

The passenger compartment of the smart #1 remained stable in the frontal offset test. Dummy readings indicated good protection of the knees and femurs of both the driver and passenger. smart demonstrated that a similar level of protection would be provided to occupants of different sizes and to those sitting in different positions. Analysis of the deceleration of the impact trolley during the test, and analysis of the deformable barrier after the test, revealed that the car would be a benign impact partner in a frontal collision. In the full-width rigid barrier test, protection of the driver was good for all critical body regions of both dummies, apart from the chest of the rear passenger, protection of which was adequate. In the side barrier impact, protection of all critical body areas was good and the smart scored maximum points in this part of the assessment. In the more severe side pole test, protection of the chest was adequate and that of other critical parts of the body was good. Control of excursion (the extent to which a body is thrown to the other side of the vehicle when it is hit from the far side) was found to be adequate. The smart #1 has a counter-measure to mitigate against occupant to occupant injuries in such impacts. Tests on the front seats and head restraints demonstrated good protection against whiplash injuries in the event of a rear-end collision. A geometric analysis of the rear seats also indicated good whiplash protection. The smart #1 has an advanced eCall system which alerts the emergency services in the event of a crash and a ‘Post-Impact Braking’ system which automatically applies the brakes to prevent secondary collisions.