Ulteriori informazioni nella sezione Commenti generali della valutazione
Ulteriori informazioni nella scheda Validità della valutazione
-
See More
![]()
94% -
See More
![]()
92% -
See More
![]()
70% -
See More
![]()
71%
- Buona
- Adeguata
- Marginale
- Scarsa
- Insufficiente
Passeggero
Conducente
Sedile anteriore
Vettura
Palo
- Buona
- Adeguata
- Marginale
- Scarsa
- Insufficiente
Passeggero
laterale
Centro
![]()
Montato di serie sul veicolo![]()
Non montato sul veicolo di prova, ma disponibile come opzione![]()
Non disponibile
Non montato sul veicolo di prova, ma disponibile come opzioneThe Leon scored maximum points based on readings from the child dummies in the dynamic tests. In the frontal impact, forward movement of the head of the 3 year dummy, sat in a forward facing restraint, was not excessive. In the side impact, both dummies were properly contained by the protective shells of their restraints, minimising the risk of head contact with parts of the car's interior. The passenger airbag can be disabled to allow a rearward-facing restraint to be used in the front passenger seat. Clear information is provided to the driver regarding the status of the airbag and the system was rewarded. The dangers of using a rearward-facing restraint in that seating positions without first disabling the airbag is clearly and permanently indicated.
- Buona
- Adeguata
- Marginale
- Scarsa
- Insufficiente
Impatto testa 16,9 Pt
Impatto bacino 2,2 Pt
Impatto gambe 6,0 Pt
The bumper scored maximum points for the protection it offered to pedestrians' legs. However, the front edge of the bonnet was marginal or poor in all areas tested. The bonnet offered good protection in most areas likely to be struck by a pedestrian's head.
- Buona
- Adeguata
- Marginale
- Scarsa
- Insufficiente
| Nome sistema | ESC | |
| Prestazioni | ||
| Imbardata veicolo @ COS + 1.00 s | 1600% | conforme ai requisiti ECE |
| Imbardata veicolo @ COS + 1.75 s | 200% | conforme ai requisiti ECE |
| Spostamento laterale @ BOS + 1.07 s | 3.26 m | conforme ai requisiti ECE |
| Si applica a | Front seats | ||
| Attenzione | Sedile conducente | passeggero(i) anteriore(i) | passeggero(i) posteriore(i) |
| Visivo | |
|
 |
| Acustico | |
|
|
|
|||
Non superatoElectronic stability control is standard equipment and met Euro NCAP's test requirements. There is a standard-fit seatbelt reminder on the driver and front passenger seats. A driver-set speed warning system is available on the Leon but it was not assessed by Euro NCAP as it is not standard on all variants.
- Specifiche
- Dotazione di sicurezza
- Video
- Premi Advanced
- Validità della valutazione
Specifiche
Modello testato Seat Leon 1.6TDI 'Reference', LHD
Tipo carrozzeria - 5 door hatchback
Anno di costruzione 2012
Peso a vuoto 1205kg
VIN a cui si riferisce la valutazione - applies to all Leons of the specification tested
Classe Familiare piccola
Dotazione di sicurezza
Nota: altre dotazioni possono essere disponibili sul veicolo ma non sono state considerate nell'anno del test.
![]()
Montato di serie sul veicolo![]()
Montato sul veicolo come opzione![]()
Non montato sul veicolo di prova, ma disponibile come opzione![]()
Non disponibile![]()
Non applicabile
Montato sul veicolo come opzioneVideo
Premi Advanced
Validità della valutazione
Ulteriori informazioni nella sezione Commenti generali della valutazione
Based on information reviewed by Euro NCAP, a similar level of safety performance can be expected from the Seat Leon ST (estate) and the Seat Leon x-perience.
Condividi
Data provided by Seat and reviewed by Euro NCAP demonstrates that the Seat Leon X-Perience can be expected to provide a similar level of safety to the variant tested. Accordingly, the star rating applies also to the X-Perience.
The passenger compartment of the Leon remained stable in the frontal impact. Dummy readings indicated good protection of the knees and femurs of the front seat passengers. Seat showed that a similar level of protection would be available to occupants of different sizes and to those sat in different positions. The Leon scored maximum points in the side barrier test, with good protection of all body regions. In the more severe side pole impact, protection of the chest and abdomen was adequate and that of the head and pelvis was good. The seat and head restraint provided good protection against whiplash injury in the event of a rear-end impact.