- See More
- See More
- See More
- See More
- Buona
- Adeguata
- Marginale
- Scarsa
- Insufficiente






- Buona
- Adeguata
- Marginale
- Scarsa
- Insufficiente


Passeggero
laterale
Montato di serie sul veicolo
Non montato sul veicolo di prova, ma disponibile come opzione
Non disponibile
-
neonati fino a 13 kg
-
neonati e bambini fino a 18 kg
-
Bambini da 9 a 18 kg
-
Bambini oltre 18 kg
Installazione senza problemi
Installazione accurata
Problema per la sicurezza
Installazione non consentita
Sedile | |||
---|---|---|---|
Anteriore | 2a fila | ||
Passeggero | Sinistra | Destra | |
Maxi Cosi Cabriofix (Belt) | |||
Britax Römer King Plus (Belt) | |||
Britax Römer Duo Plus (ISOFIX) | |||
Britax Römer KidFix (Belt) | |||
Maxi Cosi Cabriofix & EasyFix (Belt) | |||
Maxi Cosi Cabriofix & EasyFix (ISOFIX) | |||
BeSafe iZi Kid X3 ISOfix (ISOFIX) | |||
Maxi Cosi Pearl & Familyfix (ISOFIX) | |||
Britax Römer KidFix (ISOFIX) |
Installazione senza problemi
Installazione accurata
Problema per la sicurezza
Installazione non consentita
Based on dummy readings alone, the Twingo scored maximum points for its protection of the 1½ year infant in the crash tests. Forward movement of the 3 year dummy, sat in a forward-facing seat, was not excessive but high tensile forces were recorded in the neck. The passenger airbag can be disabled to allow a rearward-facing child restraint to be used in that position. Clear information is provided to the driver regarding the status of the airbag and the system was rewarded. All of the categories of child restraints for which the car is designed could be properly installed and accommodated by the car.
- Buona
- Adeguata
- Marginale
- Scarsa
- Insufficiente

Impatto testa 15,3 Pt
Impatto bacino 3,2 Pt
Impatto gambe 6,0 Pt
The protection provided by the bumper was good, and the car scored maximum points in this area. However, the performance of the front edge of the bonnet was mixed but was predominantly weak or poor. The protection provided by the bonnet surface was mostly marginal or adequate, with some poor results recorded on the stiff windscreen pillars.
- Buona
- Adeguata
- Marginale
- Scarsa
- Insufficiente
Funzione limitazione velocità | Manually Set |
Nome sistema | ESP | |
Prestazioni |
Si applica a | All seats | ||
Attenzione | Sedile conducente | passeggero(i) anteriore(i) | passeggero(i) posteriore(i) |
Visivo | |||
Acustico | |||
|
The Twingo has a seatbelt reminder system as standard for the front and rear seats. A standard-fit speed assistance system informs the driver of the relevant speed limit and can be set by the driver accordingly. Electronic stability control is also standard. A lane departure warning system is available as an option but was not tested as it is not expected to be sold in sufficient numbers. There is no autonomous braking system on the Twingo.
- Specifiche
- Dotazione di sicurezza
- Video
- Validità della valutazione
Specifiche
Modello testato Renault Twingo 1.0 'E2', LHD
Tipo carrozzeria - 5 door hatchback
Anno di costruzione 2014
Peso a vuoto 945kg
VIN a cui si riferisce la valutazione - applies to all Twingos of the specification tested
Classe Supermini
Dotazione di sicurezza
Nota: altre dotazioni possono essere disponibili sul veicolo ma non sono state considerate nell'anno del test.
Montato di serie sul veicolo
Montato sul veicolo come opzione
Non montato sul veicolo di prova, ma disponibile come opzione
Non disponibile
Non applicabile
Video
Validità della valutazione
Recensioni annuali e modelli affini













The passenger compartment of the Twingo remained stable in the frontal impact. Protection of the passenger dummy was good for all parts of the body. Dummy readings indicated good protection of the knees and femurs of both the driver and passenger dummy. Renault showed that a similar level of protection would be provided to occupants of different sizes and to those sat in different positions. Rearward movement of the brake pedal led to a marginal rating for protection of the driver's feet and ankles. In the side barrier test, protection of all body regions was good except that of the chest, which was adequate. In the more severe side pole impact, dummy readings of rib deflections indicated weak protection of the chest. Protection against whiplash injuries in a rear-end collision was rated as good for the front seats and poor for the rear.