- With standard equipment
- With safety pack
Ulteriori informazioni nella sezione Commenti generali della valutazione
Ulteriori informazioni nella scheda Validità della valutazione
- See More
- See More
- See More
- See More
- Buona
- Adeguata
- Marginale
- Scarsa
- Insufficiente








-
Avvicinamento a un veicolo fermo: Sfalsamento a sinistra
-
Avvicinamento a un veicolo fermo: Nessuno sfalsamento
-
Avvicinamento a un veicolo fermo: Sfalsamento a destra
- Buona
- Adeguata
- Marginale
- Scarsa
- Insufficiente


Passeggero
laterale
Centro
Montato di serie sul veicolo
Non montato sul veicolo di prova, ma disponibile come opzione
Non disponibile
-
i-Size
-
ISOFIX
-
Sistema di ritenuta con ancoraggio a cinture di sicurezza universali
Installazione senza problemi
Installazione accurata
Problema per la sicurezza
Installazione non consentita
Sedile | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Anteriore | 2a fila | |||
Passeggero | Sinistra | Centro | Destra | |
Maxi Cosi 2way Pearl & 2wayFix (rearward) (iSize) | ||||
Maxi Cosi 2way Pearl & 2wayFix (forward) (iSize) | ||||
BeSafe iZi Kid X2 i-Size (iSize) | ||||
BeSafe iZi Flex FIT i-Size (iSize) | ||||
Maxi Cosi Cabriofix & FamilyFix (ISOFIX) | ||||
BeSafe iZi Kid X4 ISOfix (ISOFIX) | ||||
Britax Römer Duo Plus (ISOFIX) | ||||
Britax Römer KidFix XP (ISOFIX) | ||||
Maxi Cosi Cabriofix (Belt) | ||||
Maxi Cosi Cabriofix & EasyBase2 (Belt) | ||||
Britax Römer King II LS (Belt) | ||||
Britax Römer KidFix XP (Belt) |
Installazione senza problemi
Installazione accurata
Problema per la sicurezza
Installazione non consentita
In the frontal test, protection of all critical body areas was good or adequate for both dummies. In the side barrier impact, all critical body areas were well protected for both dummies and the Juke scored maximum points in this part of the assessment. The front passenger airbag can be disabled to allow a rearward-facing child restraint to be used in that seating position. Clear information is provided to the driver regarding the status of the airbag and the system was rewarded. All of the restraint types for which the Juke is designed could be properly installed and accommodated in the car.
- Buona
- Adeguata
- Marginale
- Scarsa
- Insufficiente

Impatto testa 15,1 Pt
Impatto bacino 6,0 Pt
Impatto gambe 6,0 Pt
Nome sistema | Intelligent Emergency Braking (IEB) | |||
Tipo | Auto-Brake with Forward Collision Warning | |||
Operativo da | 5 Km/h | |||
Prestazioni | | ||||
Funzione freno automatico |
-
Un ciclista attraversa la strada
-
Un ciclista pedala a bordo strada
The bonnet provided predominantly good or adequate protection to the head of a struck pedestrian, with a few poor results recorded on the stiff windscreen pillars. The bumper provided good protection to pedestrians' legs and protection of the pelvis was also good at all test locations, and the Juke scored maximum points in these tests. The Juke's AEB system can detect vulnerable road users like pedestrians and cyclists, as well as other vehicles. In tests, the system's response to cyclists was good and to pedestrians was adequate, with collisions avoided or mitigated in most cases.
- Buona
- Adeguata
- Marginale
- Scarsa
- Insufficiente
Nome sistema | Speed Limiter/Traffic Sign Recognition |
Funzione informazione limiti velocità | Camera based |
Funzione controllo velocità | Manually set (accurate to 5km/h) |
Si applica a | All Seats | ||
Attenzione | Sedile conducente | passeggero(i) anteriore(i) | passeggero(i) posteriore(i) |
Visivo | |||
Acustico | |||
Rilevamento occupanti | |||
|
Nome sistema | Intelligent Lane Intervention (ILI) |
Tipo | LKA (including LDW) |
Operativo da | 55 km/h |
Prestazioni | |
Lane Keep Assist (LKA) | |
Interfaccia uomo-macchina |
Nome sistema | Intelligent Emergency Braking (IEB) | |||
Tipo | Autonomous Emergency Braking and Forward Collision Warning | |||
Operativo da | 5 km/h | |||
Ulteriori informazioni | Supplementary warning |
The Juke has a seatbelt reminder system for the front and rear seats. The AEB system performed well in tests of its response to other vehicles at highway speeds. A lane support system helps to prevent inadvertent drifting out of lane, as well as intervening more aggressively in some critical situations. The speed assistance system uses a camera to identify local speed limits. This information is presented to the driver who can then set the speed limiter as appropriate.
- Specifiche
- Dotazione di sicurezza
- Video
- Validità della valutazione
Specifiche
Modello testato Nissan Juke, DIG-T 117, N-Connecta, LHD
Tipo carrozzeria - 5 door hatchback
Anno di costruzione 2019
Peso a vuoto 1212kg
VIN a cui si riferisce la valutazione - all Jukes, including hybrid
Classe Piccolo SUV
Dotazione di sicurezza
Nota: altre dotazioni possono essere disponibili sul veicolo ma non sono state considerate nell'anno del test.
Montato di serie sul veicolo
Montato sul veicolo come parte del Safety Pack
Non montato sulla vettura testata ma disponibile come opzione o come parte del Safety Pack
Non disponibile
Non applicabile
Video
Validità della valutazione
Varianti della gamma di modelli
Body Type | Engine | Drivetrain | Rating Applies | |
---|---|---|---|---|
LHD | RHD | |||
5 door SUV | 1.0 petrol* | 4 x 2 | ![]() |
![]() |
5 door SUV | 1.6 petrol hybrid** | 4 x 2 | ![]() |
![]() |
* Tested variant
** Additional tests performed




Ulteriori informazioni nella sezione Commenti generali della valutazione

The passenger compartment of the Juke remained stable in the frontal offset test. Dummy readings indicated good protection of the knees and femurs of the driver and passenger. Nissan showed that a similar level of protection would be provided to occupants of different sizes and to those sitting in different positions. Protection of the front passenger was good for all critical body areas. In the full-width rigid barrier test, protection of all critical body regions was good or adequate for both the driver and rear passenger. In the side barrier impact, protection of all critical body areas was good and the car scored full points in this test. In the more severe side pole test, protection of the chest was rated as adequate, with good protection of other parts of the body. Tests on the front seats and head restraints demonstrated good protection against whiplash injuries in the event of a rear-end collision. A geometric assessment of the rear seats also indicated good whiplash protection. The standard-fit autonomous emergency braking (AEB) system performed well in tests of its functionality at the low speeds at which many whiplash injuries occur, with collisions avoided in most test scenarios.