-
See More
![]()
68% -
See More
![]()
81% -
See More
![]()
67% -
See More
![]()
55%
- Buona
- Adeguata
- Marginale
- Scarsa
- Insufficiente
Passeggero
Conducente
Sedile anteriore
Vettura
Pole
- Buona
- Adeguata
- Marginale
- Scarsa
- Insufficiente
Passeggero
laterale
Centro
laterale
![]()
Montato di serie sul veicolo![]()
Non montato sul veicolo di prova, ma disponibile come opzione![]()
Non disponibile
Non montato sul veicolo di prova, ma disponibile come opzione-
neonati fino a 13 kg
-
neonati e bambini fino a 18kg
-
Bambini da 9 a 18 kg
-
Bambini oltre 18 kg
![]()
Installazione senza problemi![]()
Installazione accurata![]()
Problema per la sicurezza![]()
Installazione non consentita
Installazione accurata| Sedile | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anteriore | 2a fila | 3a fila | ||||
| Passeggero | Sinistra | Centro | Destra | Sinistra | Destra | |
| Maxi Cosi Cabriofix (Belt) | |
|
|
|
|
|
| Britax Römer King Plus (Belt) | |
|
|
|
|
|
| Britax Römer Duo Plus (ISOFIX) | |
|
|
|
|
|
| Britax Römer KidFix (Belt) | |
|
 |
|
|
|
| Maxi Cosi Cabriofix & EasyFix (Belt) | |
|
|
|
|
|
| Maxi Cosi Cabriofix & EasyFix (ISOFIX) | |
|
|
|
|
|
| BeSafe iZi Kid X3 ISOfix (ISOFIX) | |
|
|
|
|
|
| Maxi Cosi Pearl & Familyfix (ISOFIX) | |
|
|
|
|
|
| Britax Römer KidFix (ISOFIX) | |
|
|
|
|
|
![]()
Installazione senza problemi![]()
Installazione accurata![]()
Problema per la sicurezza![]()
Installazione non consentita
Based on dummy readings in the dynamic tests, the Evalia scored maximum points for its protection of both the 3 year and 18 month infants. Forward movement of the 3 year dummy, sat in a forward-facing restraint, was not excessive. In the side impact, both dummies were properly contained by their restraints, minimising the risk of dangerous head contact with parts of the car interior. The passenger airbag can be disabled to allow a rearward-facing restraint to be used in that seating position. However, labelling was not clear and the system was not rewarded. The group 2/3 universal restraint failed the installation check in the rear centre seat but, otherwise, all restraint types could be correctly installed in those seating positions designed to take them.
- Buona
- Adeguata
- Marginale
- Scarsa
- Insufficiente
Impatto testa 14.4 Pt
Impatto bacino 5 Pt
Impatto gambe 4.8 Pt
The bumper offered good protection to pedestrians' legs in most areas tested. The front edge of the bonnet also provided mostly good protection to the pelvis area. The protection provided by the bonnet in those areas likely to be struck by a pedestrian's head was predominantly adequate or marginal.
- Buona
- Adeguata
- Marginale
- Scarsa
- Insufficiente
| Nome sistema | ESC | |
| Prestazioni | ||
| Imbardata veicolo @ COS + 1.00 s | 1800% | conforme ai requisiti ECE |
| Imbardata veicolo @ COS + 1.75 s | 500% | conforme ai requisiti ECE |
| Spostamento laterale @ BOS + 1.07 s | 2.68 m | conforme ai requisiti ECE |
| Si applica a | Front seats | ||
| Attenzione | Sedile conducente | passeggero(i) anteriore(i) | passeggero(i) posteriore(i) |
| Visivo | |
|
 |
| Acustico | |
|
|
|
|||
The Evalia has electronic stability control as standard equipment and also has a seatbelt reminder for the front seats. A driver-set speed limitation device is available but failed Euro NCAP's requirements as it gives only a visual warning to the driver when the set speed is exceeded.
- Specifiche
- Dotazione di sicurezza
- Video
- Verifiche e rinnovi annuali
Specifiche
Modello testato Nissan Evalia 1.5dCi Full Trim, LHD
Tipo carrozzeria - 5 door MPV
Anno di costruzione 2013
Peso a vuoto 1426kg
VIN a cui si riferisce la valutazione - TBC
Classe Piccolo monovolume
Dotazione di sicurezza
Nota: altre dotazioni possono essere disponibili sul veicolo ma non sono state considerate nell'anno del test.
![]()
Montato di serie sul veicolo![]()
Montato sul veicolo come opzione![]()
Non montato sul veicolo di prova, ma disponibile come opzione![]()
Non disponibile![]()
Non applicabile
Montato sul veicolo come opzioneVideo
Verifiche e rinnovi annuali
Condividi
When the car was inspected after the frontal impact test, it was found that the floor panel had torn away from the base of the A pillar and numerous spot welds had released between the floor and sill. The main body of the sill was found to be bent inwards. The passenger compartment was judged to be unstable and the car was penalised. Similarly, the driver's footwell was found to have ruptured and was unstable and a further penalty was applied. Protection of the driver was predominantly marginal. In the side barrier test, protection of the chest was adequate and that of other body regions was good. However, in the more severe side pole impact, dummy readings of rib compression indicated weak protection of the chest. The seat and head restraint offered marginal protection against whiplash injury in the event of a rear-end collision.