- See More
- See More
- See More
- See More
- Buona
- Adeguata
- Marginale
- Scarsa
- Insufficiente





- Buona
- Adeguata
- Marginale
- Scarsa
- Insufficiente


Passeggero
laterale
Centro
Montato di serie sul veicolo
Non montato sul veicolo di prova, ma disponibile come opzione
Non disponibile
Based on dummy readings, the i-MiEV was awarded maximum points for its protection of the 3 year dummy in the dynamic tests. The passenger airbag can be disabled to allow a rearward facing child restraint to be used in that seating position. However, information provided to the driver regarding the status of the airbag is not sufficiently clear. A permanently attached label clearly warns of the dangers of using a rearward facing restraint in that seat without first disabling the airbag.
- Buona
- Adeguata
- Marginale
- Scarsa
- Insufficiente

Impatto testa 11,2 Pt
Impatto bacino 0,0 Pt
Impatto gambe 6,0 Pt
The bumper provided good protection and scored maximum points in Euro NCAP's tests. The front edge of the bonnet scored no points, offering poor protection to pedestrians' legs. The bonnet provided predominantly poor protection in those areas likely to be struck by the head of a child. However, the bonnet provided good protection in most of the areas where an adult's head would strike.
- Buona
- Adeguata
- Marginale
- Scarsa
- Insufficiente
Electronic stability control is standard equipment on the i-MiEV, together with a seatbelt reminder system for the front and rear seats.
- Specifiche
- Dotazione di sicurezza
- Video
- Validità della valutazione
Specifiche
Modello testato Mitsubishi i-MiEV, LHD
Tipo carrozzeria - 5 door hatchback
Anno di costruzione 2011
Peso a vuoto 1110kg
VIN a cui si riferisce la valutazione - applies to all i-MiEVs of the specification tested
Classe Supermini
Dotazione di sicurezza
Nota: altre dotazioni possono essere disponibili sul veicolo ma non sono state considerate nell'anno del test.
Montato di serie sul veicolo
Montato sul veicolo come opzione
Non montato sul veicolo di prova, ma disponibile come opzione
Non disponibile
Non applicabile
Video
Validità della valutazione
Recensioni annuali e modelli affini





Inspection of the i-MiEV after the frontal impact showed that several structures had reached the limit of their load-bearing capacity. The passenger compartment was judged to be unstable as the vehicle might not be able to withstand an impact at a higher speed. As a consequence, the score for the driver's chest was penalised and protection of this body region was rated as marginal. Most of the floor in the driver’s footwell was heavily distorted and this too was penalised, leading to a marginal rating for protection of the driver's feet and ankles. Structures in the dashboard posed a risk of injury to the knees and femurs of both the driver and passenger. In the side barrier impact, the driver's door opened and the car was penalised, although dummy readings showed protection was at least adequate. However, in the more severe side pole test, dummy readings of rib compression indicated poor protection of the chest. Protection against whiplash injury in the event of a rear collision was good. No problems were experienced with the high voltage electrical system which powers the vehicle: the battery was properly isolated from the bodyshell and was not damaged during the tests.