Ulteriori informazioni nella sezione Commenti generali della valutazione
Ulteriori informazioni nella scheda Validità della valutazione
-
See More
![]()
88% -
See More
![]()
85% -
See More
![]()
52% -
See More
![]()
68%
- Buona
- Adeguata
- Marginale
- Scarsa
- Insufficiente
Passeggero
Conducente
Passeggero posteriore
Conducente
Vettura
Palo
Sedile posteriore
Sedile anteriore
-
Avvicinamento a un veicolo fermo: Sfalsamento a sinistra
-
Avvicinamento a un veicolo fermo: Nessuno sfalsamento
-
Avvicinamento a un veicolo fermo: Sfalsamento a destra
- Buona
- Adeguata
- Marginale
- Scarsa
- Insufficiente
Passeggero
laterale
Centro
![]()
Montato di serie sul veicolo![]()
Non montato sul veicolo di prova, ma disponibile come opzione![]()
Non disponibile
-
i-Size
-
ISOFIX
-
Sistema di ritenuta con ancoraggio a cinture di sicurezza universali
![]()
Installazione senza problemi![]()
Installazione accurata![]()
Problema per la sicurezza![]()
Installazione non consentita
Installazione accurata
Problema per la sicurezza| Sedile | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anteriore | 2a fila | |||
| Passeggero | Sinistra | Centro | Destra | |
| Maxi Cosi 2way Pearl & 2wayFix (rearward) (iSize) |  |
|
|
|
| Maxi Cosi 2way Pearl & 2wayFix (forward) (iSize) | |
|
|
|
| BeSafe iZi Kid X2 i-Size (iSize) | |
|
|
|
| BeSafe iZi Flex FIX i-Size (iSize) | |
|
|
|
| Maxi Cosi Cabriofix & FamilyFix (ISOFIX) | |
|
|
|
| BeSafe iZi Kid X4 ISOfix (ISOFIX) | |
|
|
|
| Britax Römer Duo Plus (ISOFIX) | |
|
|
|
| Britax Römer KidFix XP (ISOFIX) | |
|
|
|
| Maxi Cosi Cabriofix (Belt) | |
|
|
|
| Maxi Cosi Cabriofix & EasyBase2 (Belt) | |
|
|
|
| Britax Römer King II LS (Belt) | |
|
|
|
| Britax Römer KidFix XP (Belt) | |
|
|
|
![]()
Installazione senza problemi![]()
Installazione accurata![]()
Problema per la sicurezza![]()
Installazione non consentita
With the exception of the neck of the 10 year dummy, for which dummy readings of tensile forces indicated marginal protection, all critical body areas were well or adequately protected in the frontal offset test. In the side barrier impact, protection of all critical body areas was good and the car scored maximum points for this part of the assessment. The front passenger airbag can be disabled to allow a rearward-facing child restraint to be used in that seating position. Clear information is provided to the driver regarding the status of the airbag, and the system was rewarded. All of the restraint types for which the Ceed is designed could be properly installed and accommodated in the car.
- Buona
- Adeguata
- Marginale
- Scarsa
- Insufficiente
Impatto testa 14,2 Pt
Impatto bacino 5,0 Pt
Impatto gambe 6,0 Pt
The protection provided by the bonnet to the head of a struck pedestrian was predominantly good or adequate, with some poor results recorded on the stiff windscreen pillars. The bumper offered good protection to pedestrians' legs but protection of the pelvis was mixed, with results ranging from good to marginal. The AEB system fitted as standard responds only to other vehicles and does not detect vulnerable road users like pedestrians and cyclists.
- Buona
- Adeguata
- Marginale
- Scarsa
- Insufficiente
| Nome sistema | Manual Speed Limit Assist (MSLA) |
| Funzione controllo velocità | Manually set (accurate to 5km/h) |
| Si applica a | All Seats | ||
| Attenzione | Sedile conducente | passeggero(i) anteriore(i) | passeggero(i) posteriore(i) |
| Visivo | |
|
|
| Acustico | |
|
|
| Rilevamento occupanti | |
|
|
|
|||
| Nome sistema | Lane Keeping Assist (LKA) |
| Tipo | ELK + LKA (including LDW) |
| Operativo da | 60 km/h |
| Prestazioni | |
| Emergency Lane Keeping (ELK) | |
| Lane Keep Assist (LKA) | |
| Interfaccia uomo-macchina | |
| Nome sistema | Forward Collision-Avoidance Assist (FCA) | |||
| Tipo | Autonomous Emergency Braking and Forward Collision Warning | |||
| Operativo da | 8 km/h | |||
- Solo funzione freno automatico
- Il conducente reagisce all'avviso
Solo funzione freno automatico
-
Avvicinamento a un veicolo più lento Sfalsamento a sinistra
-
Avvicinamento a un veicolo più lento Nessuno sfalsamento
-
Avvicinamento a un veicolo più lento Sfalsamento a destra
-
Avvicinamento a un veicolo in frenata
Il conducente reagisce all'avviso
-
Avvicinamento a un veicolo fermo Sfalsamento a sinistra
-
Avvicinamento a un veicolo fermo Nessuno sfalsamento
-
Avvicinamento a un veicolo fermo Sfalsamento a destra
-
Avvicinamento a un veicolo più lento Sfalsamento a sinistra
-
Avvicinamento a un veicolo più lento Nessuno sfalsamento
-
Avvicinamento a un veicolo più lento Sfalsamento a destra
-
Avvicinamento a un veicolo in frenata
The Ceed has a seatbelt reminder for the front and rear seats. Lane support helps to prevent accidental drifting out of lane and also intervenes more aggressively in certain critical situations. A driver-set speed limiter helps to prevent over-speeding. The standard-fit AEB system performed adequately in tests of its response to other vehicles at highway speeds.
- Specifiche
- Dotazione di sicurezza
- Video
- Validità della valutazione
Specifiche
Modello testato Kia Ceed 1.4T-GDI 'EX', LHD
Tipo carrozzeria - 5 door hatchback
Anno di costruzione 2019
Peso a vuoto 1240kg
VIN a cui si riferisce la valutazione - all Kia Ceeds
Classe Familiare piccola
Dotazione di sicurezza
Nota: altre dotazioni possono essere disponibili sul veicolo ma non sono state considerate nell'anno del test.
![]()
Montato di serie sul veicolo![]()
Montato sul veicolo come parte del Safety Pack![]()
Non montato sulla vettura testata ma disponibile come opzione o come parte del Safety Pack![]()
Non disponibile![]()
Non applicabile
Montato sul veicolo come parte del Safety PackVideo
Validità della valutazione
Varianti della gamma di modelli
| Body Type | Engine & Transmission | Model Name/Code | Drivetrain | Rating Applies | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LHD | RHD | ||||
| 5 door hatchback | 1.0 T-GDI | Ceed | 4 x 2 |  |
|
| 5 door hatchback | 1.0 T-GDI 48V MHEV | Ceed | 4 x 2 | |
|
| 5 door hatchback | 1.4 T-GDI* | Ceed | 4 x 2 | |
|
| 5 door hatchback | 1.5 T-GDI | Ceed | 4 x 2 | |
|
| 5 door hatchback | 1.5 T-GDI 48V MHEV | Ceed | 4 x 2 | |
|
| 5 door hatchback | 1.6 T-GDI | Ceed | 4 x 2 | |
|
| 5 door hatchback | 1.6 CRDi | Ceed | 4 x 2 | |
|
| 5 door hatchback | 1.6 CRDi 48V EV | Ceed | 4 x 2 | |
|
| 5 door estate | 1.0 T-GDI | Ceed Sportswagon | 4 x 2 | |
|
| 5 door estate | 1.0 T-GDI 48V MHEV | Ceed Sportswagon | 4 x 2 | |
|
| 5 door estate | 1.4 T-GDI | Ceed Sportswagon | 4 x 2 | |
|
| 5 door estate | 1.5 T-GDI | Ceed Sportswagon | 4 x 2 | |
|
| 5 door estate | 1.5 T-GDI 48V MHEV | Ceed Sportswagon | 4 x 2 | |
|
| 5 door estate | 1.6 CRDi | Ceed Sportswagon | 4 x 2 | |
|
| 5 door estate | 1.6 CRDi 48V EV | Ceed Sportswagon | 4 x 2 | |
|
| 5 door estate | 1.0 T-GDI | ProCeed | 4 x 2 | |
|
| 5 door estate | 1.4 T-GDI | ProCeed | 4 x 2 | |
|
| 5 door estate | 1.5 T-GDI | ProCeed | 4 x 2 | |
|
| 5 door estate | 1.5 T-GDI 48V MHEV | ProCeed | 4 x 2 | |
|
| 5 door estate | 1.6 T-GDI | ProCeed | 4 x 2 | |
|
| 5 door estate | 1.6 CRDi | ProCeed | 4 x 2 | |
|
| 5 door estate | 1.6 CRDi 48V EV | ProCeed | 4 x 2 | |
|
| 5 door hatchback | 1.0 T-GDI | XCeed | 4 x 2 | |
|
| 5 door hatchback | 1.4 T-GDI | XCeed | 4 x 2 | |
|
| 5 door hatchback | 1.5 T-GDI | XCeed | 4 x 2 | |
|
| 5 door hatchback | 1.5 T-GDI 48V MHEV | XCeed | 4 x 2 | |
|
| 5 door hatchback | 1.6 T-GDI | XCeed | 4 x 2 | |
|
| 5 door hatchback | 1.6 CRDi | XCeed | 4 x 2 | |
|
| 5 door hatchback | 1.6 CRDi 48V EV | XCeed | 4 x 2 | |
|
* Tested variant
Ulteriori informazioni nella sezione Commenti generali della valutazione
Condividi
The passenger compartment of the Ceed remained stable in the frontal offset test. Dummy readings indicated good protection of the knees and femurs of the driver and passenger. Kia showed that a similar level of protection would be provided to occupants of different sizes and to those sitting in different positions. There was insufficient pressure in the driver's airbag to prevent the head from flattening out the airbag and, in effect, making contact with the steering wheel. Although dummy readings did not reveal critical injury values, the score was penalised and protection of this body area reduced to 'adequate'. In the full-width rigid barrier test, protection of all body areas was good or adequate for both the driver and rear passenger. In the side barrier impact, protection of all critical parts of the body was good and the Ceed scored full points in this test. However, in the more severe side pole test, readings of shoulder force indicated that this part of the dummy had taken much of the load that would otherwise have been on the ribs. As a result, the score for the chest was heavily penalised and its protection was rated as poor. Protection of other body areas was good. Tests on the front seats and head restraints demonstrated good protection against whiplash injuries in the event of a rear-end collision. A geometric assessment of the rear seats indicated marginal whiplash protection. The Ceed has, as standard, and autonomous emergency braking (AEB) system that operates at the low speeds at which many whiplash injuries occur. In Euro NCAP's tests, the system performed well.