- With standard equipment
- With safety pack
Ulteriori informazioni nella sezione Commenti generali della valutazione
Ulteriori informazioni nella scheda Validità della valutazione
- See More
- See More
- See More
- See More
- Buona
- Adeguata
- Marginale
- Scarsa
- Insufficiente








-
Avvicinamento a un veicolo fermo: Sfalsamento a sinistra
-
Avvicinamento a un veicolo fermo: Nessuno sfalsamento
-
Avvicinamento a un veicolo fermo: Sfalsamento a destra
- Buona
- Adeguata
- Marginale
- Scarsa
- Insufficiente


Passeggero
laterale
Centro
laterale *
Montato di serie sul veicolo
Non montato sul veicolo di prova, ma disponibile come opzione
Non disponibile
-
i-Size
-
ISOFIX
-
Sistema di ritenuta con ancoraggio a cinture di sicurezza universali
Installazione senza problemi
Installazione accurata
Problema per la sicurezza
Installazione non consentita
Sedile | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Anteriore | 2a fila | 3a fila | ||||
Passeggero | Sinistra | Centro | Destra | Sinistra | Destra | |
Maxi Cosi 2way Pearl & 2wayFix (rearward) (iSize) | ||||||
Maxi Cosi 2way Pearl & 2wayFix (forward) (iSize) | ||||||
BeSafe iZi Kid X2 i-Size (iSize) | ||||||
BeSafe iZi Flex FIX i-Size (iSize) | ||||||
Maxi Cosi Cabriofix & FamilyFix (ISOFIX) | ||||||
BeSafe iZi Kid X4 ISOfix (ISOFIX) | ||||||
Britax Römer Duo Plus (ISOFIX) | ||||||
Britax Römer KidFix XP (ISOFIX) | ||||||
Maxi Cosi Cabriofix (Belt) | ||||||
Maxi Cosi Cabriofix & EasyBase2 (Belt) | ||||||
Britax Römer King II LS (Belt) | ||||||
Britax Römer KidFix XP (Belt) |
Installazione senza problemi
Installazione accurata
Problema per la sicurezza
Installazione non consentita
In the frontal offset test, dummy readings of tensile forces indicated marginal protection of the neck for the 10-year dummy. Otherwise, protection of both dummies was good or adequate. In the side barrier test, protection of both child dummies was good and maximum points were scored. The front passenger airbag can be disabled to allow a rearward-facing child restraint to be used in this seating position. Clear information is provided to the driver regarding the status of the airbag and the system was rewarded. All of the restraint types for which the CR-V is designed could be properly installed and accommodated, including in the optional third row seats.
- Buona
- Adeguata
- Marginale
- Scarsa
- Insufficiente

Impatto testa 16,8 Pt
Impatto bacino 3,0 Pt
Impatto gambe 6,0 Pt
Nome sistema | Collision Mitigation Brake System | |||
Tipo | Auto-Brake with Forward Collision Warning | |||
Operativo da | 5 Km/h | |||
Prestazioni | | ||||
Funzione freno automatico |
-
Un ciclista attraversa la strada
-
Un ciclista pedala a bordo strada
The protection provided by the bonnet to the head of a struck pedestrian was good or adequate over most of its surface, with areas of good and poor performance. Protection of pedestrian's legs was good in all test areas and the CR-V scored maximum points. Protection of pelvis was mixed. The AEB system can detect pedestrians and cyclists, as well as other vehicles. The system performed well in pedestrian tests but was marginal in the more severe cyclist tests.
- Buona
- Adeguata
- Marginale
- Scarsa
- Insufficiente
Nome sistema | Intelligent Speed Limiter |
Funzione informazione limiti velocità | Camera based |
Funzione controllo velocità | System advised (accurate to 5km/h) |
Si applica a | Not available | ||
Attenzione | Sedile conducente | passeggero(i) anteriore(i) | passeggero(i) posteriore(i) |
Visivo | |||
Acustico | |||
Rilevamento occupanti | |||
|
Nome sistema | Road Departure Mitigation |
Tipo | LKA (including LDW) |
Operativo da | 72 km/h |
Prestazioni | |
Lane Keep Assist (LKA) | |
Interfaccia uomo-macchina |
Nome sistema | Collision Mitigation Brake System | |||
Tipo | Autonomous Emergency Braking and Forward Collision Warning | |||
Operativo da | 5 km/h | |||
Ulteriori informazioni | Supplementary warning and Restraint activation |
The AEB system gave generally good results in tests of its functionality at highway speeds. The car has a lane assistance system which helps prevent inadvertent drifting out of lane. A camera-based speed assistance system recognises local speed limits and presents the information to the driver, allowing the limiter to be manually set to the appropriate speed. A seatbelt reminder is standard for front and rear seats.
- Specifiche
- Dotazione di sicurezza
- Video
- Validità della valutazione
Specifiche
Modello testato Honda CR-V 2.0 Hybrid, LHD
Tipo carrozzeria - 5 door SUV
Anno di costruzione 2019
Peso a vuoto 1612kg
VIN a cui si riferisce la valutazione - all CR-Vs
Classe Grande SUV
Dotazione di sicurezza
Nota: altre dotazioni possono essere disponibili sul veicolo ma non sono state considerate nell'anno del test.
Montato di serie sul veicolo
Montato sul veicolo come parte del Safety Pack
Non montato sulla vettura testata ma disponibile come opzione o come parte del Safety Pack
Non disponibile
Non applicabile
Video
Validità della valutazione
Varianti della gamma di modelli
Body Type | Engine | Drivetrain | Rating Applies | |
---|---|---|---|---|
LHD | RHD | |||
5 door SUV | 1.5 petrol | 4 x 2 | ![]() |
![]() |
5 door SUV | 1.5 petrol | 4 x 4 | ![]() |
![]() |
5 door SUV | 2.0 petrol hybrid* | 4 x 2 | ![]() |
![]() |
5 door SUV | 2.0 petrol hybrid | 4 x 4 | ![]() |
![]() |
* Tested variant




Ulteriori informazioni nella sezione Commenti generali della valutazione

The passenger compartment of the CR-V remained stable in the frontal offset test. Dummy readings indicated good protection of the knees and femurs of the driver and passenger. Honda showed that a similar level of protection would be provided to occupants of different sizes and to those sitting in different positions. Protection of the passenger dummy was good for all critical body areas. In the full-width rigid barrier test, protection of the driver and rear passenger was good or adequate for all critical body areas. In the side barrier test, protection of all critical body areas was good and the CR-V scored maximum points. In the more severe side pole impact, dummy readings of rib deflection indicated marginal protection of the chest. Tests on the front seats and head restraints demonstrated good protection against whiplash injury in the event of a rear-end collision. However, a geometric assessment of the rear seats indicated poor whiplash protection. The standard-fit autonomous emergency braking (AEB) system performed well in tests at the low speeds, typical of city driving, at which many whiplash injuries are caused.