- With standard equipment
- With safety pack
-
See More
![]()
72% -
See More
![]()
32% -
See More
![]()
78% -
See More
![]()
61%
- Buona
- Adeguata
- Marginale
- Scarsa
- Insufficiente
Passeggero
Conducente
Passeggero posteriore
Conducente
Vettura
Palo
Sedile posteriore
Sedile anteriore
- Buona
- Adeguata
- Marginale
- Scarsa
- Insufficiente
Passeggero
laterale
![]()
Montato di serie sul veicolo![]()
Non montato sul veicolo di prova, ma disponibile come opzione![]()
Non disponibile
Non montato sul veicolo di prova, ma disponibile come opzione-
i-Size
-
ISOFIX
-
Sistema di ritenuta con ancoraggio a cinture di sicurezza universali
![]()
Installazione senza problemi![]()
Installazione accurata![]()
Problema per la sicurezza![]()
Installazione non consentita
Installazione accurata| Sedile | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Anteriore | 2a fila | ||
| Passeggero | Sinistra | Destra | |
| Maxi Cosi 2way Pearl & 2wayFix (rearward) (iSize) |  |
|
|
| Maxi Cosi 2way Pearl & 2wayFix (forward) (iSize) | |
|
|
| BeSafe iZi Kid X2 i-Size (iSize) | |
|
|
| Maxi Cosi Cabriofix & FamilyFix (ISOFIX) | |
|
|
| BeSafe iZi Kid X4 ISOfix (ISOFIX) | |
|
|
| Britax Römer Duo Plus (ISOFIX) | |
|
|
| Britax Römer KidFix XP (ISOFIX) | |
 |
|
| Maxi Cosi Cabriofix (Belt) | |
|
|
| Maxi Cosi Cabriofix & EasyBase2 (Belt) | |
|
|
| Britax Römer King II LS (Belt) | |
|
|
| Britax Römer KidFix XP (Belt) | |
|
|
![]()
Installazione senza problemi![]()
Installazione accurata![]()
Problema per la sicurezza![]()
Installazione non consentita
For the impact tests, the 10 year dummy was sat on a booster cushion. Owing to limited rear space the results of the dynamic tests on the 10 year dummy were done in a separate test. In the frontal offset test, protection of the 10 year dummy was rated as at least adequate. However, the shoulder belt slipped between the clavicle and the upper arm and the score for the dummy in this test was penalised. Protection of the 6 year dummy, sat in a high-back booster, was rated as good and adequate for the head and neck respectively but dummy readings of chest deceleration indicated marginal chest protection. In the side barrier test, dummy readings indicated good protection, apart from the head of the 10 year dummy. The head bottomed out the side curtain airbag, making contact, through the deflated airbag material, with the trim on the C pillar. Consequently, all points were lost for the 10 year dummy in this test. The front passenger airbag can be automatically disabled to allow a rearward-facing restraint to be used in that seating position. The information provided to the driver regarding the status of the airbag met Euro NCAP's requirements.
- Buona
- Adeguata
- Marginale
- Scarsa
- Insufficiente
Impatto testa 21,0 Pt
Impatto bacino 0,0 Pt
Impatto gambe 6,0 Pt
| Nome sistema | Pre Collision Assist (PCA) | |||
| Tipo | Auto-Brake with Forward Collision Warning | |||
| Operativo da | 5 Km/h | |||
| Ulteriori informazioni | Defaults on for every journey; operates above 40km/h and in low ambient light | |||
| Evitamento | Mitigazione | |||
|
Adulto che cammina in attraversamento da parte opposta
|
Collisione evitata fino a 45 km/h | Collisione mitigata fino a 60 km/h | ||
|
Adulto che cammina in attraversamento dal lato marciapiede -25%
|
Collisione evitata fino a 40 km/h | Collisione mitigata fino a 60 km/h | ||
|
Adulto che cammina in attraversamento dal lato marciapiede -75%
|
Collisione evitata fino a 50 km/h | Collisione mitigata fino a 60 km/h | ||
|
Bambino che proviene in corsa da veicoli parcheggiati
|
Collisione evitata fino a 40 km/h | Collisione mitigata fino a 50 km/h | ||
The Mustang has an 'active' bonnet. Sensors in the bumper detect when a pedestrian has been struck and actuators lift the bonnet, creating more space to the hard structures in the engine bay. Ford demonstrated that the system worked robustly for a variety of pedestrian statures and over a range of speeds and, accordingly, the tests were performed in the raised (deployed) position. Test results were good over almost the entire bonnet surface. Protection of the pelvic region was poor in all areas tested but the bumper provided good protection to pedestrians' legs and scored maximum points in Euro NCAP's tests. The autonomous emergency braking system can detect pedestrians as well as other vehicles and performed well in tests of this functionality.
- Buona
- Adeguata
- Marginale
- Scarsa
- Insufficiente
| Si applica a | Front seats | ||
| Attenzione | Sedile conducente | passeggero(i) anteriore(i) | passeggero(i) posteriore(i) |
| Visivo | |
|
|
| Acustico | |
|
|
|
|||
| Nome sistema | Lane Keeping Aid |
| Tipo | Lane Keep Assist and Lane Departure Warning |
| Operativo da | 65 km/h |
| Attenzione | Audible |
| Prestazioni | |
|
Test conferma LKA
|
Pass (4/5) |
|
Test conferma LDW
|
Pass |
| Nome sistema | Pre Collision Assist (PCA) | |||
| Tipo | Forward Collision Warning with Auto-Brake | |||
| Operativo da | 5 km/h | |||
| Ulteriori informazioni | Default On | |||
| Prestazioni | | ||||
| Solo funzione freno automatico | il conducente reagisce all'avviso | |||
| Velocità operativa | 5-300 km/h | 5-300 km/h | ||
| avvicinamento a un veicolo fermo | Vedere AEB urbano | Impatto evitato fino a 75 km/h.Velocità impatto ridotta fino a 80 km/h. | ||
| avvicinamento a un veicolo più lento | Impatto evitato fino a 70 km/h. | Impatto evitato fino a 80 km/h. | ||
| Guida dietro un'auto a breve distanza | ||||
| l'auto antistante frena gradualmente | Evitamento | Evitamento | ||
| l'auto antistante frena bruscamente | Mitigazione | Mitigazione | ||
| Guida dietro un'auto a lunga distanza | ||||
| l'auto antistante frena gradualmente | Evitamento | Evitamento | ||
| l'auto antistante frena bruscamente | Evitamento | Evitamento | ||
The Mustang has a seatbelt reminder system for the front seats only. The latest Mustang has an autonomous emergency braking system that operates at highways speeds. In tests, the system performed well, with collisions avoided or mitigated in almost every test speed and scenario. Also standard is a lane keeping assistance system which gently steers the car away from a lane marking if it is drifting out of lane.
- Specifiche
- Dotazione di sicurezza
- Video
- Validità della valutazione
Specifiche
Modello testato Ford Mustang 5.0 Fastback, LHD
Tipo carrozzeria - 2 door coupe
Anno di costruzione 2017
Peso a vuoto 1768kg
VIN a cui si riferisce la valutazione - all 2018 model year Mustang Fastbacks
Classe Roadster sports
Dotazione di sicurezza
Nota: altre dotazioni possono essere disponibili sul veicolo ma non sono state considerate nell'anno del test.
![]()
Montato di serie sul veicolo![]()
Montato sul veicolo come parte del Safety Pack![]()
Non montato sulla vettura testata ma disponibile come opzione o come parte del Safety Pack![]()
Non disponibile![]()
Non applicabile
Montato sul veicolo come parte del Safety PackVideo
Validità della valutazione
Varianti della gamma di modelli
| Body Type | Engine & Transmission | Model Name/Code | Drivetrain | Rating Applies | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LHD | RHD | ||||
| * 2 door coupe | 5.0 V8 Manual and Automatic | Mustang Fastback 5.0 V8 | 4 x 2 |
 |
|
| 2 door coupe | 2.3 EcoBoost Manual and Automatic | Mustang Fastback 2.3 EcoBoost | 4 x 2 |
|
|
| 2 door convertible | 5.0 V8 Manual and Automatic | Mustang Convertible 5.0 V8 | 4 x 2 |
 |
|
| 2 door convertible | 2.3 EcoBoost Manual and Automatic | Mustang Convertible 2.3 EcoBoost | 4 x 2 |
|
|
* Tested variant
Recensioni annuali e modelli affini
The Ford Mustang has been reassessed following changes made to the latest version. Cars which can be ordered from July 2017 onwards are equipped as standard with Ford's Pre Collision Assist (with Pedestrian Detection, Forward Collision Warning and Autonomous Emergency Braking) and Lane Keeping Aid. Structurally, the new vehicle is identical to the last, so this assessment uses the crash tests performed previously. The restraint system has been updated to prevent the airbag bottoming out for driver and passenger. In addition, the automatic airbag deactivation now meets Euro NCAP's requirements.
Condividi
The passenger compartment of the Mustang remained stable in the frontal offset test. Dummy readings indicated good protection of the knees and femurs of the driver and passenger dummies. Analysis of the dummy data showed that the driver's head had 'bottomed out' the airbag i.e. there was insufficient pressure in the airbag to prevent the head from contacting the steering wheel through the deflated airbag material. The head of the passenger dummy also bottomed out the airbag against the dashboard, owing to insufficient inflation of the airbag and inadequate restraint for larger statures by the front passenger seatbelt load-limiter. Ford have shown improved performance from the airbags fitted to the latest Mustang, with bottoming-out avoided. However, the frontal offset test was not repeated and the scores reflect the performance seen in the original test. In the full-width rigid barrier test, protection of the driver was good apart from the chest, protection of which was adequate. However, the rear seat passenger slipped under the lap portion of the seatbelt (a phenomenon known as 'submarining') and the score for the knee, femur and pelvis body region was penalised and protection was rated as poor. Protection of the chest was also rated as poor as the rear seatbelt (which has neither pre-tensioners nor load-limiters) showed an excessively high tensile force in the test. Dummy readings of head deceleration indicated weak protection of the head for the rear passenger. In the side barrier test, the Mustang scored full points with good protection of all critical body areas. Even in the more severe side pole test, protection of the chest was adequate and that of other body regions was good. Tests on the front seats and head restraints demonstrated a marginal level of protection against whiplash injury in the event of a rear-end collision. A geometric assessment of rear seats indicated poor whiplash protection in these seating positions. The latest Mustang has an autonomous emergency braking system as standard. The system performed well in tests of its functionality at the low speeds typical of city driving at which many whiplash accidents occur. However, the system did not qualify for points as the car's passive whiplash protection was inadequate.