Ulteriori informazioni nella sezione Commenti generali della valutazione
Ulteriori informazioni nella scheda Validità della valutazione
-
See More
![]()
59% -
See More
![]()
86% -
See More
![]()
26% -
See More
![]()
26%
- Buona
- Adeguata
- Marginale
- Scarsa
- Insufficiente
Passeggero
Conducente
Sedile anteriore
Vettura
Palo
- Buona
- Adeguata
- Marginale
- Scarsa
- Insufficiente
Passeggero
laterale
Centro
![]()
Montato di serie sul veicolo![]()
Non montato sul veicolo di prova, ma disponibile come opzione![]()
Non disponibile
Non montato sul veicolo di prova, ma disponibile come opzioneBased on dummy readings in the front and side impact tests, the Scudo scored maximum points for its protection of both the 18 month and 3 year infants. In the frontal test, forward movement of the 3 year dummy, sat in a forward-facing seat, was not excessive. In the side impact, both dummies were properly contained by their restraints, minimising the likelihood of head contacts with the vehicle interior. The front passenger airbag can be disabled to allow a rearward-facing restraint to be used in that seating position. However, information provided to the driver regarding the status of the airbag is not sufficiently clear, and the system was not rewarded. The dangers of using a rearward-facing restraint in that seat without first disabling the airbag are clearly indicated inside the vehicle.
- Buona
- Adeguata
- Marginale
- Scarsa
- Insufficiente
Impatto testa 7,8 Pt
Impatto bacino 0,0 Pt
Impatto gambe 0,0 Pt
The bumper provided poor protection to pedestrians' legs in all areas tested and scored no points. Assessment of the front edge of the bonnet was not appropriate owing to the shape and height of the vehicle. In those areas likely to be struck by the head of a child or that of an adult, protection was predominantly poor.
- Buona
- Adeguata
- Marginale
- Scarsa
- Insufficiente
| Si applica a | Driver's seat | ||
| Attenzione | Sedile conducente | passeggero(i) anteriore(i) | passeggero(i) posteriore(i) |
| Visivo | |
 |
|
| Acustico | |
|
|
|
|||
Non superatoElectronic stability control is available as an option but did not meet Euro NCAP's fitment requirements, and was not assessed. There is a seatbelt reminder system for the driver's seat and a driver-set speed limitation device is standard equipment on more than half of vehicles sold, and met Euro NCAP's technical requirements.
- Specifiche
- Dotazione di sicurezza
- Video
- Validità della valutazione
Specifiche
Modello testato FIAT Scudo 2.0 diesel, Combi, LHD
Tipo carrozzeria - 8/9 seater van
Anno di costruzione 2012
Peso a vuoto 1900kg
VIN a cui si riferisce la valutazione - all Scudos of the specification tested
Classe Grande monovolume
Dotazione di sicurezza
Nota: altre dotazioni possono essere disponibili sul veicolo ma non sono state considerate nell'anno del test.
![]()
Montato di serie sul veicolo![]()
Montato sul veicolo come opzione![]()
Non montato sul veicolo di prova, ma disponibile come opzione![]()
Non disponibile![]()
Non applicabile
Video
Validità della valutazione
Ulteriori informazioni nella sezione Commenti generali della valutazione
Condividi
The passenger compartment remained stable in the frontal impact. Although the car tested had two separate front seats, the passenger airbag is wide enough to protect a third, centre occupant in cars fitted with a bench-style passenger seat. Dummy readings indicated good protection of the knees and femurs of the driver and front passenger. For the outboard leg of the front passenger, the facia end posed a risk of injury but the dashboard was otherwise considered to provide good protection to those of other sizes and those sat in different positions. In the side barrier test, protection of the chest was adequate and that of other body regions was good. No pole test was done as a head-protecting airbag did not meet fitment requirements. A geometric assessment of the front and rear seats revealed poor protection against whiplash injury in the event of a rear-end collision.