Ulteriori informazioni nella sezione Commenti generali della valutazione
Ulteriori informazioni nella scheda Validità della valutazione
- See More
- See More
- See More
- See More
- Buona
- Adeguata
- Marginale
- Scarsa
- Insufficiente






- Buona
- Adeguata
- Marginale
- Scarsa
- Insufficiente


Passeggero
laterale
Centro
Montato di serie sul veicolo
Non montato sul veicolo di prova, ma disponibile come opzione
Non disponibile
-
neonati fino a 13 kg
-
neonati e bambini fino a 18 kg
-
Bambini da 9 a 18 kg
-
Bambini oltre 18 kg
Installazione senza problemi
Installazione accurata
Problema per la sicurezza
Installazione non consentita
Sedile | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Anteriore | 2a fila | |||
Passeggero | Sinistra | Centro | Destra | |
Maxi Cosi Cabriofix (Belt) | ||||
Britax Römer King Plus (Belt) | ||||
Britax Römer Duo Plus (ISOFIX) | ||||
Britax Römer KidFix (Belt) | ||||
Maxi Cosi Cabriofix & EasyFix (Belt) | ||||
Maxi Cosi Cabriofix & EasyFix (ISOFIX) | ||||
BeSafe iZi Kid X3 ISOfix (ISOFIX) | ||||
Maxi Cosi Pearl & Familyfix (ISOFIX) | ||||
Britax Römer KidFix (ISOFIX) |
Installazione senza problemi
Installazione accurata
Problema per la sicurezza
Installazione non consentita
Based on dummy readings in the crash tests, the Logan MCV scored maximum points for its protection of the 1½ year dummy. In the frontal impact, forward movement of the 3 year dummy, sat in a forward-facing restraint, was not excessive. However, tensile forces in the neck were high, losing all points, and forces in the chest were marginally so. The front passenger airbag can be disabled to allow a rearward-facing child restraint to be used in that seating position. However, the switch to change the airbag status is marked only by a removable label, and the system was not rewarded. All of the restraint types for which the car is designed could be properly installed and accommodated in the car with the exception of the semi-universal Group 0 restraint which uses a support leg. In the rear centre seating position this support leg cannot be properly installed because of the centre tunnel.
- Buona
- Adeguata
- Marginale
- Scarsa
- Insufficiente

Impatto testa 14,8 Pt
Impatto bacino 0,0 Pt
Impatto gambe 5,2 Pt
The protection offered by the bumper to pedestrians' legs was predominantly good or adequate. However, the front edge of the bonnet showed poor protection of the pelvis areas in all tests, and scored no points. The protection provided by the bonnet to a pedestrian's head was mainly good or adequate, with poor results recorded on the stiff windscreen pillars.
- Buona
- Adeguata
- Marginale
- Scarsa
- Insufficiente
Nome sistema | ESP | |
Prestazioni |
Si applica a | Front seats | ||
Attenzione | Sedile conducente | passeggero(i) anteriore(i) | passeggero(i) posteriore(i) |
Visivo | |||
Acustico | |||
|
The Logan MCV has electronic stability control as standard. A seatbelt reminder for the driver and front passenger is also standard but there is no system for the rear seats. The Logan MCV does have a speed assistance system as an option but it is not expected to be fitted to the majority of vehicles sold so it was not included in the assessment. Neither a lane keeping assist system nor autonomous emergency braking are available.
- Specifiche
- Dotazione di sicurezza
- Video
- Validità della valutazione
Specifiche
Modello testato Dacia Logan MCV 1.5 diesel Base, LHD
Tipo carrozzeria - 5 door wagon
Anno di costruzione 2014
Peso a vuoto 1216kg
VIN a cui si riferisce la valutazione - applies to all Logan MCV of the specification tested
Classe Piccolo monovolume
Dotazione di sicurezza
Nota: altre dotazioni possono essere disponibili sul veicolo ma non sono state considerate nell'anno del test.
Montato di serie sul veicolo
Montato sul veicolo come opzione
Non montato sul veicolo di prova, ma disponibile come opzione
Non disponibile
Non applicabile
Video
Validità della valutazione














Ulteriori informazioni nella sezione Commenti generali della valutazione

In the frontal impact test, the passenger compartment suffered extensive deformation and could clearly not withstand any further loading. There was a large fold at the top of the windscreen pillar and the bottom load path through the wheel and sill had lost its integrity, and the car was penalised. This penalty, together with dummy readings of chest compression, resulted in the driver's chest protection being rated as weak. Neither the driver nor the passenger seatbelt has a pretensioner. Dummy readings indicated good protection of the knees and femurs of the driver and passenger. However, structures on the driver's side of the dashboard - steering column, fuse box and brackets - presented a hazard to occupants of different statures and to those sat in different positions, and protection of the knees and femurs was rated as marginal. The rear mounting of the front lower subframe was pushed rearwards in the impact, rupturing the footwell area. Rearward movement of the clutch was 144mm and protection of the driver's feet and ankles was rated as weak. In the side impact, the seat-mounted head/thorax airbag deployed forward of the dummy's head and provided very little protection. While dummy readings were not excessive, a penalty was applied to the head protection in both the side barrier and pole tests owing to the incorrect deployment of the airbag in the side barrier test. In the pole test, dummy readings of rib compression indicated weak chest protection. The driver's seat was pushed sideways and covered the seatbelt buckle, which could not then be released. The seatbelt had to be cut in order to remove the dummy from the car. Tests indicated marginal protection against whiplash injury for the front seat occupants in a rear-end collision. A geometric assessment of the rear seats indicated poor whiplash protection.