- With standard equipment
- With safety pack
Ulteriori informazioni nella sezione Commenti generali della valutazione
Ulteriori informazioni nella scheda Validità della valutazione
- See More
- See More
- See More
- See More
- Buona
- Adeguata
- Marginale
- Scarsa
- Insufficiente


- Buona
- Adeguata
- Marginale
- Scarsa
- Insufficiente


Passeggero
laterale
Centro
Montato di serie sul veicolo
Non montato sul veicolo di prova, ma disponibile come opzione
Non disponibile
-
i-Size
-
ISOFIX
-
Sistema di ritenuta con ancoraggio a cinture di sicurezza universali
Installazione senza problemi
Installazione accurata
Problema per la sicurezza
Installazione non consentita
Sedile | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Anteriore | 2a fila | |||
Passeggero | Sinistra | Centro | Destra | |
Maxi Cosi 2way Pearl & 2wayFix (i-Size) | ||||
Maxi Cosi 2way Pearl & 2wayFix (i-Size) | ||||
BeSafe iZi Kid X2 i-Size (i-Size) | ||||
Britax Römer TriFix2 i-Size (i-Size) | ||||
BeSafe iZi Flex FIX i-Size (i-Size) | ||||
BeSafe iZi Combi X4 ISOfix (ISOFIX) | ||||
Cybex Solution Z i-Fix (ISOFIX) | ||||
Maxi Cosi Cabriofix (Belt) | ||||
Maxi Cosi Cabriofix & EasyFix (Belt) | ||||
Britax Römer King II LS (Belt) | ||||
Cybex Solution Z i-Fix (Belt) |
Installazione senza problemi
Installazione accurata
Problema per la sicurezza
Installazione non consentita
In the frontal offset test, protection of the neck of the 10 year dummy was rated as marginal, based on readings of tensile forces. Otherwise, protection of the 10 and 6 year dummies was good or adequate. In the side barrier impact, protection of all critical body areas was good for both child dummies. The front passenger airbag can be disabled to allow a rearward-facing child restraint to be used in that seating position. Clear information is provided to the driver regarding the status of the airbag and the system was rewarded. All of the child restraint types for which the C4 is designed could be properly installed and accommodated.
- Buona
- Adeguata
- Marginale
- Scarsa
- Insufficiente

Impatto testa 15,3 Pt
Impatto bacino 6,0 Pt
Impatto gambe 6,0 Pt
Nome sistema | Active Safety Brake | |||
Tipo | Auto-Brake with Forward Collision Warning | |||
Operativo da | 10 Km/h | |||
Prestazioni | | ||||
Funzione freno automatico |
The protection provided by the bonnet to the head of a struck pedestrian was predominantly good or adequate over the bonnet surface but tests on areas around the base of the windscreen and on the stiff windscreen pillars indicated poor protection. The bumper provided good protection to pedestrians’ legs and the pelvis area was also well protected, the C4 scoring maximum points in both of these areas. The autonomous emergency braking (AEB) system of the C4 detects some vulnerable road users as well as other vehicles. In tests of its response to pedestrians, the AEB system showed marginal performance, with avoidance or mitigation only in some of the test scenarios.
- Buona
- Adeguata
- Marginale
- Scarsa
- Insufficiente
Nome sistema | Speed Limit Sign Recognition & Recommendation |
Funzione informazione limiti velocità | Camera based, subsigns supported |
Funzione controllo velocità | System advised (accurate to 5km/h) |
Si applica a | Front and rear seats, including third row | ||
Attenzione | Sedile conducente | passeggero(i) anteriore(i) | passeggero(i) posteriore(i) |
Visivo | |||
Acustico | |||
Rilevamento occupanti | |||
|
Nome sistema | Driver Attention Warning |
Tipo | Steering input and standard deviation of lane positioning |
Operativo da | 65 km/h |
Nome sistema | Lane Keeping Assist |
Tipo | LKA and ELK |
Operativo da | 65 km/h |
Prestazioni | |
Emergency Lane Keeping (ELK) | |
Lane Keep Assist (LKA) | |
Interfaccia uomo-macchina |
Nome sistema | Active Safety Brake | |||
Tipo | Autonomous emergency braking and forward collision warning | |||
Operativo da | 10 km/h | |||
Sensore utilizzato | camera only |
The C4 is equipped as standard with a seatbelt reminder system for front and rear seats. A camera-based speed limit recognition system advises the driver of the local speed limit, allowing the speed limiter to be set appropriately. Lane support is provided by ‘Lane Keep Assist’ which corrects the course of a vehicle which is drifting out of lane and also intervenes in some more critical situations. The autonomous emergency braking (AEB) system performed adequately in tests of its recognition and response to other vehicles.
- Specifiche
- Dotazione di sicurezza
- Video
- Validità della valutazione
Specifiche
Modello testato Citroën C4 1.2 petrol 'Feel Pack', LHD
Tipo carrozzeria - 5 door hatchback
Anno di costruzione 2021
Peso a vuoto 1305kg
VIN a cui si riferisce la valutazione - all C4 and C4X
Classe Familiare piccola
Dotazione di sicurezza
Nota: altre dotazioni possono essere disponibili sul veicolo ma non sono state considerate nell'anno del test.
Montato di serie sul veicolo
Montato sul veicolo come parte del Safety Pack
Non montato sulla vettura testata ma disponibile come opzione o come parte del Safety Pack
Non disponibile
Non applicabile
Video
Validità della valutazione
Varianti della gamma di modelli
Body Type | Engine & Transmission | Model Name/Code | Drivetrain | Rating Applies | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
LHD | RHD | ||||
5 door hatchback | 1.2 petrol* | C4, C4X | 4 x 2 | ![]() |
![]() |
5 door hatchback | 1.5 diesel | C4, C4X | 4 x 2 | ![]() |
![]() |
5 door hatchback | pure electric | ë-C4, ë-C4X | 4 x 2 | ![]() |
![]() |
* Tested variant


Ulteriori informazioni nella sezione Commenti generali della valutazione

The passenger compartment of the C4 remained stable in the frontal offset test. Dummy readings demonstrated good protection of the knees and femurs of both the driver and passenger dummies. Citroën showed that the same level of protection would be provided to the upper legs of occupants of different statures to the test dummy and to those sitting in different positions. However, dummy readings also indicated marginal protection of the front passenger's lower leg. Analysis of decelerations of the impact trolley and of the deformed impact barrier after the test indicated that the C4 would be a reasonably benign collision partner. In the full-width rigid barrier test, good or adequate protection was provided to all critical parts of the body. The C4 scored maximum points in both the side barrier and side pole impacts, with good protection of all critical body regions. The extent to which sideways excursion (movement of the occupant to the opposite side of the car) was mitigated was rated as [poor] [weak], and no counter-measure is fitted to prevent occupant to occupant injuries in side impacts. Tests on the front seats and head restraints demonstrated good protection against whiplash injuries in the event of a rear-end collision. A geometric analysis of the rear seats also indicated good whiplash protection. The C4 is equipped with 'In-Crash Braking', a system designed to prevent secondary impacts after a collision. However, the system did not meet Euro NCAP's requirements and was not rewarded.