Ulteriori informazioni nella sezione Commenti generali della valutazione
Ulteriori informazioni nella scheda Validità della valutazione
-
See More
![]()
94% -
See More
![]()
83% -
See More
![]()
57% -
See More
![]()
71%
- Buona
- Adeguata
- Marginale
- Scarsa
- Insufficiente
Passeggero
Conducente
Sedile anteriore
Vettura
Palo
- Buona
- Adeguata
- Marginale
- Scarsa
- Insufficiente
Passeggero
laterale
Centro
![]()
Montato di serie sul veicolo![]()
Non montato sul veicolo di prova, ma disponibile come opzione![]()
Non disponibile
Non montato sul veicolo di prova, ma disponibile come opzioneForward movement of this dummy, sat in a forward facing restraint, was not excessive. In the side impact, both the 3 year and the 18 month dummy were properly restrained by their restraints, minimising the likelihood of dangerous head contact. The passenger airbag can be disabled, allowing a rearward facing child restraint to be used in that seating position. However, the system did not meet Euro NCAP's requirements regarding the clarity of information provided to the driver, and the system was not rewarded. Clear information is provided in the car regarding the danger of using a rearward facing restraint in the passenger seat without first disabling the airbag.
- Buona
- Adeguata
- Marginale
- Scarsa
- Insufficiente
Impatto testa 14,7 Pt
Impatto bacino 1,8 Pt
Impatto gambe 4,0 Pt
The bumper provided good protection in most areas tested but was poor in some. The front edge of the bonnet was predominantly poor. In most areas likely to be struck by a child's head, the bonnet provided good protection but it offered predominantly poor protection in those areas likely to be struck by the head of an adult.
- Buona
- Adeguata
- Marginale
- Scarsa
- Insufficiente
| Prestazioni | ||
| Imbardata veicolo @ COS + 1.00 s | 152300% | conforme ai requisiti ECE |
| Imbardata veicolo @ COS + 1.75 s | 495400% | conforme ai requisiti ECE |
| Spostamento laterale @ BOS + 1.07 s | 3.09 m | conforme ai requisiti ECE |
| Si applica a | Front seats | ||
| Attenzione | Sedile conducente | passeggero(i) anteriore(i) | passeggero(i) posteriore(i) |
| Visivo | |
|
 |
| Acustico | |
|
|
|
|||
Non superatoElectronic stability control is standard equipment across the Malibu range and met Euro NCAP's test requirements. A seatbelt reminder is provided for the driver and front passenger seating positions. A seatbelt reminder is available as an option for the rear seats but did not meet Euro NCAP's fitment requirements for assessment in 2011. A speed limitation device is not available for the Malibu.
- Specifiche
- Dotazione di sicurezza
- Video
- Validità della valutazione
Specifiche
Modello testato Chevrolet Malibu 2.4 LTZ, LHD
Tipo carrozzeria - 4 door saloon
Anno di costruzione 2011
Peso a vuoto 1605kg
VIN a cui si riferisce la valutazione - applies to all Malibus of the specification tested
Classe Familiare grande
Dotazione di sicurezza
Nota: altre dotazioni possono essere disponibili sul veicolo ma non sono state considerate nell'anno del test.
![]()
Montato di serie sul veicolo![]()
Montato sul veicolo come opzione![]()
Non montato sul veicolo di prova, ma disponibile come opzione![]()
Non disponibile![]()
Non applicabile
Montato sul veicolo come opzioneVideo
Validità della valutazione
Ulteriori informazioni nella sezione Commenti generali della valutazione
Condividi
In the frontal test, the passenger compartment remained stable. Maximum points were scored for protection of the driver, all body areas being well protected. Dummy readings indicated good protection of the knees and femurs of the driver and passenger. Chevrolet showed that a similar level of protection would be provided for occupants of different sizes and to those sat in different positions. In the side barrier impact, the Malibu scored maximum points, with good protection of all body areas. In the more severe side pole test, protection of the abdomen was marginal. The seat and reactive head restraint provided good protection against whiplash injuries in the event of a rear-end collision.