Ulteriori informazioni nella sezione Commenti generali della valutazione
Ulteriori informazioni nella scheda Validità della valutazione
-
See More
![]()
87% -
See More
![]()
86% -
See More
![]()
64% -
See More
![]()
71%
- Buona
- Adeguata
- Marginale
- Scarsa
- Insufficiente
Passeggero
Conducente
Sedile anteriore
Vettura
Palo
- Buona
- Adeguata
- Marginale
- Scarsa
- Insufficiente
Passeggero
laterale
Centro
![]()
Montato di serie sul veicolo![]()
Non montato sul veicolo di prova, ma disponibile come opzione![]()
Non disponibile
Non montato sul veicolo di prova, ma disponibile come opzioneBased on dummy readings, the X1 scored maximum points for its protection of the 1½ year old in the frontal and side barrier impacts. Forward movement of the head was well controlled in the frontal impact and, in the side impact, both dummies were properly contained by the restraints. The front passenger airbag can be disabled by BMW dealers to allow a rearward facing child restraint to be used in that seating position. A label clearly warns of the dangers of using a rearward facing child seat in that seat without first disabling the airbag.
- Buona
- Adeguata
- Marginale
- Scarsa
- Insufficiente
Impatto testa 16,9 Pt
Impatto bacino 0,0 Pt
Impatto gambe 6,0 Pt
Euro NCAP's pedestrian tests have changed for 2010 so, as part of the upgrade of its rating, the X1 had new tests done. The bumper scored maximum points for protection of pedestrians' legs. However, the front edge of the bonnet provided poor protection and scored no points in Euro NCAP's tests. In all areas where a child's head might strike, the bonnet offered good protection, even at the outer edges. The protection offered to the head of a struck adult was also good in some areas but was poor around the base of the windscreen.
- Buona
- Adeguata
- Marginale
- Scarsa
- Insufficiente
| Prestazioni | ||
| Imbardata veicolo @ COS + 1.00 s | 1500% | conforme ai requisiti ECE |
| Imbardata veicolo @ COS + 1.75 s | 16400% | conforme ai requisiti ECE |
| Spostamento laterale @ BOS + 1.07 s | 3.38 m | conforme ai requisiti ECE |
| Si applica a | Front seats | ||
| Attenzione | Sedile conducente | passeggero(i) anteriore(i) | passeggero(i) posteriore(i) |
| Visivo | |
|
 |
| Acustico | |
|
|
|
|||
Non superatoThe X1 is fitted with electronic stability control (ESC) as standard equipment on all variants. Likewise, a seatbelt reminder is standard for the driver and front passenger seats.
- Specifiche
- Dotazione di sicurezza
- Video
- Validità della valutazione
Specifiche
Modello testato BMW X1 2.0 diesel, LHD
Tipo carrozzeria - 5 door SUV
Anno di costruzione 2012
Peso a vuoto 1490kg
VIN a cui si riferisce la valutazione - applies to all X1s of the specification tested
Classe Piccolo SUV
Dotazione di sicurezza
Nota: altre dotazioni possono essere disponibili sul veicolo ma non sono state considerate nell'anno del test.
![]()
Montato di serie sul veicolo![]()
Montato sul veicolo come opzione![]()
Non montato sul veicolo di prova, ma disponibile come opzione![]()
Non disponibile![]()
Non applicabile
Montato sul veicolo come opzioneVideo
Validità della valutazione
Ulteriori informazioni nella sezione Commenti generali della valutazione
The rating of the BMW X1 has been upgraded from 2011 to 2012. The car is unchanged and test results have been carried over from the previous year. The 2012 rating reflects the X1's performance against Euro NCAP's latest requirements.
Condividi
The passenger compartment remained stable in the frontal impact, the windscreen pillar moving rearwards less than 5mm. Dummy readings indicated good protection of the knees and femurs of both driver and passenger. BMW were able to demonstrate that occupants of different sizes, and those sat in different positions, would be similarly well protected. In the side barrier impact, the car scored maximum points, with good protection of all body regions. In the more severe side pole test, dummy readings indicated marginal chest protection. Protection against whiplash injuries in rear impacts was also rated as marginal.