-
Plus d'info
![]()
79% -
Plus d'info
![]()
74% -
Plus d'info
![]()
32% -
Plus d'info
![]()
57%
- Bon
- Satisfaisant
- Moyen
- Faible
- Médiocre
Passager
Conducteur
Siège avant
Voiture
Poteau
- Bon
- Satisfaisant
- Moyen
- Faible
- Médiocre
Passager
latéral
Centre
![]()
Monté sur le véhicule de série![]()
Véhicule testé non équipé mais disponible en option![]()
Non disponible
Véhicule testé non équipé mais disponible en optionBased on dummy results in the frontal and side impacts, the Transporter scored maximum points for its protection of the 3 year infant. In the frontal impact, forward movement of the 3 year dummy, sat in a forward-facing restraint, was not excessive and, in the side impact, both dummies were properly contained within the protective shells of their restraints, minimising the likelihood of head contact with parts of the vehicle interior. The front passenger airbag can be disabled to allow a rearward-facing child restraint to be used in that seating position. However, the information provided to the driver about the status of the airbag is not clear and the system was not rewarded. The dangers of using a rearward-facing restraint in that seat without first disabling the airbag are not clearly labelled on the vehicle interior.
- Bon
- Satisfaisant
- Moyen
- Faible
- Médiocre
Choc à la tête 9,8 Pts
Choc au bassin 0,0 Pts
Choc aux jambes 0,0 Pts
The bumper provided poor protection to pedestrians' legs and scored no points in this area. Most of the bonnet surface provided protection that ranged between poor and marginal though good results were recorded on the windscreen.
- Bon
- Satisfaisant
- Moyen
- Faible
- Médiocre
| Nom du système | ESP | |
| Performances | ||
| Taux d'embardée du véhicule à COS + 1.00 s | 0% | Répond aux exigences de la CEE |
| Taux d'embardée du véhicule à COS + 1.75 s | 0% | Répond aux exigences de la CEE |
| Déplacement latéral à BOS + 1.07 s | 2.6 m | Répond aux exigences de la CEE |
| S'applique à | Not available | ||
| Alerte | Siège conducteur | passager(s) avant | passager(s) arrière |
| Visuelle | |
 |
|
| Sonore | |
|
|
|
|||
ÉchoueThe Transporter has electronic stability control as standard equipment on passenger-carrying and commercial variants. A seatbelt reminder for the driver is also standard equipment. A speed limitation device is not available on the Transporter.
- Caractéristiques
- Équipement de sécurité
- Vidéos
- Validité de la notation
Caractéristiques
Modèle testé Volkswagen T5 Transporter Kombi, RHD
Type de carrosserie - Van
Année de production 2013
Poids en ordre de marche 1880kg
NIV à partir duquel la notation s'applique - all VW T5 Transporters of the specification tested
Catégorie Grand monospace
Équipement de sécurité
Remarque : d'autres équipements peuvent être disponibles sur le véhicule mais n'ont pas été pris en compte dans l'année de test.
![]()
Monté sur le véhicule de série![]()
Monté sur le véhicule en option![]()
Véhicule testé non équipé mais disponible en option![]()
Non disponible![]()
Non applicable
Monté sur le véhicule en optionVidéos
Validité de la notation
Révisions annuelles et nouvelles versions
Partager
The passenger compartment remained stable in the frontal impact test. Dummy readings indicated good protection of the knees and femurs of the driver and passenger dummies. However, structures in the dashboard were thought to present a risk to occupants of different sizes or those sat in different positions. The Transporter scored maximum points in the side barrier test with good protection of all body regions. In the more severe side pole impact, protection of the chest was marginal and that of the abdomen was adequate while that of the head and pelvis was good. Whiplash protection was assessed by analysing the geometry of front and rear seats and head restraints. The assessment revealed marginal protection against whiplash injuries in the event of a rear-end collision.