- With standard equipment
- With safety pack
Pour plus d’informations, veuillez consulter la section Commentaires généraux de l’évaluation
Vous trouverez plus d’informations dans l’onglet Validité de la notation
- Plus d'info
- Plus d'info
- Plus d'info
- Plus d'info
- Bon
- Satisfaisant
- Moyen
- Faible
- Médiocre


- Bon
- Satisfaisant
- Moyen
- Faible
- Médiocre


Passager
latéral
Centre
Monté sur le véhicule de série
Véhicule testé non équipé mais disponible en option
Non disponible
-
i-Size
-
ISOFIX
-
Système de retenue pour enfant à dispositif universel d'ancrage
Installation sans problème
installation avec précaution
problème critique de sécurité
installation non autorisée
Position de siège | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Avant | 2e rangée | |||
Passager | Gauche | Centre | Droite | |
Maxi Cosi 2way Pearl & 2wayFix (i-Size) | ||||
Maxi Cosi 2way Pearl & 2wayFix (i-Size) | ||||
BeSafe iZi Kid X2 i-Size (i-Size) | ||||
Britax Römer TriFix2 i-Size (i-Size) | ||||
BeSafe iZi Flex FIX i-Size (i-Size) | ||||
BeSafe iZi Combi X4 ISOfix (ISOFIX) | ||||
Cybex Solution Z i-Fix (ISOFIX) | ||||
Maxi Cosi Cabriofix (Belt) | ||||
Maxi Cosi Cabriofix & EasyFix (Belt) | ||||
Britax Römer King II LS (Belt) | ||||
Cybex Solution Z i-Fix (Belt) |
Installation sans problème
installation avec précaution
problème critique de sécurité
installation non autorisée
In the frontal offset test, dummy measurements indicated adequate protection of the neck and chest of the 10-year dummy, and adequate protection of the head and neck of the 6-year dummy. In the side barrier test, protection of the head of the 10-year dummy was rated as marginal, based on measured values of acceleration. The front passenger airbag can be disabled to allow a rearward-facing child restraint to be used in that seating position. Clear information is provided to the driver regarding the status of the airbag and the system was rewarded. All of the restraint types for the which the Taigo is designed could be properly installed and accommodated in the car.
- Bon
- Satisfaisant
- Moyen
- Faible
- Médiocre

Choc à la tête 17,5 Pts
Choc au bassin 4,9 Pts
Choc aux jambes 6,0 Pts
Nom du système | Front Assist | |||
Type | Auto-Brake with Forward Collision Warning | |||
Opérationnel à compter de/du | 4 km/h | |||
Performances | | ||||
Fonction de freinage automatique |
-
Cycliste du côté passager, vue obstruée
-
Cycliste traversant la route
-
Cycliste le long de la route
The protection provided to the head of a struck pedestrian was predominantly good or adequate, with some poor results recorded on the still windscreen pillars. The bumper provided good protection to pedestrians’ legs at all test points. Protection of the pelvis was also good over most of the car width. The autonomous emergency braking system, fitted as standard, can detect vulnerable road users as well as other vehicles. The system performed adequately in tests of its reaction to pedestrians and cyclists, with collisions avoided or mitigated in many scenarios.
- Bon
- Satisfaisant
- Moyen
- Faible
- Médiocre
Nom du système | Speed Limiter |
Fonction de contrôle de vitesse | Manually set (accurate to 5km/h) |
S'applique à | Front and rear seats, including third row | ||
Alerte | Siège conducteur | passager(s) avant | passager(s) arrière |
Visuelle | |||
Sonore | |||
Détection des occupants | |||
|
Nom du système | Driver Alert System |
Type | Steering input |
Opérationnel à compter de/du | 60 km/h |
Nom du système | Lane Assist |
Type | LKA and ELK |
Opérationnel à compter de/du | 60 km/h |
Performances | |
Système de maintien d’urgence dans la voie | |
Assistance au maintien sur la voie | |
Interface Homme-Machine |
Nom du système | Front Assist | |||
Type | Autonomous emergency braking and forward collision warning | |||
Opérationnel à compter de/du | 4 km/h | |||
Capteur utilisé | radar |
In tests of its response to other vehicles, the autonomous emergency braking system performed adequately. A lane support system gently corrects the steering if the car is drifting out of lane and it can also intervene more aggressively in some other, more critical, situations. A driver-set speed limiter is fitted as standard. A seatbelt reminder is standard for all seating positions.
- Caractéristiques
- Équipement de sécurité
- Vidéos
- Validité de la notation
Caractéristiques
Modèle testé VW Polo, 1.0 TSI 'Life', LHD
Type de carrosserie - 5 door hatchback
Année de production 2022
Poids en ordre de marche 1216kg
NIV à partir duquel la notation s'applique - all Taigos
Catégorie Petit SUV
Équipement de sécurité
Remarque : d'autres équipements peuvent être disponibles sur le véhicule mais n'ont pas été pris en compte dans l'année de test.
Monté sur le véhicule de série
Monté sur la voiture en tant qu'élément du pack sécurité
Pas monté sur le véhicule test mais disponible en tant qu'option ou élément du pack sécurité
Non disponible
Non applicable
Vidéos
Validité de la notation
Variantes de la gamme de modèles
Body Type | Engine | Model Name | Drivetrain | Rating Applies | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
LHD | RHD | ||||
5 door hatchback | 1.0 TSI petrol* | TSI | 4 x 2 | ![]() |
![]() |
5 door hatchback | 1.5 TSI petrol | TSI | 4 x 2 | ![]() |
![]() |
* Tested variant and VW Polo, 1.5TSI 'Life', LHD


Pour plus d’informations, veuillez consulter la section Commentaires généraux de l’évaluation
The Taigo is structurally identical to the VW Polo, and shares the same level of safety equipment. Additional tests have been performed where slight differences might exist and to verify the performance of the Taigo against that of the Polo. Otherwise, test results are taken from the VW Polo 2022 assessment.

The passenger compartment of the Taigo remained stable in the frontal offset test. Dummy numbers showed good protection of the knees and femurs of both the driver and passenger. Volkswagen showed that a similar level of protection would be provided to occupants of different sizes and to those sitting in different positions. Analysis of the deceleration of the impact trolley during the test, and analysis of the deformable barrier after the test, revealed that the Taigo would be a moderately benign impact partner in a frontal collision. In the full-width rigid barrier test, good or adequate protection was provided to all critical body areas, for both the driver and rear passenger. In both the side barrier test and the more severe side pole impact, protection of all critical body areas was good and the car scored maximum points in this part of the assessment. Control of excursion (the extent to which a body is thrown to the other side of the vehicle when it is hit from the far side) was found to be adequate. The car has a countermeasure to mitigate against occupant-to-occupant injuries in such impacts and this performed well in Euro NCAP's test. Tests on the front seats and head restraints demonstrated good protection against whiplash injuries in the event of a rear-end collision. A geometric analysis of the rear seats also indicated good whiplash protection. The Taigo has an advanced eCall system which alerts the emergency services in the event of a crash. The car also has a system which applies the brakes after an impact, to avoid secondary collisions.