- With standard equipment
- With safety pack
Pour plus d’informations, veuillez consulter la section Commentaires généraux de l’évaluation
Vous trouverez plus d’informations dans l’onglet Validité de la notation
- Plus d'info
- Plus d'info
- Plus d'info
- Plus d'info
- Bon
- Satisfaisant
- Moyen
- Faible
- Médiocre








-
A l’approche d’une voiture à l'arrêt: Décalage à gauche
-
A l’approche d’une voiture à l'arrêt: Pas de décalage
-
A l’approche d’une voiture à l'arrêt: Décalage à droite
- Bon
- Satisfaisant
- Moyen
- Faible
- Médiocre


Passager
latéral
Centre
Monté sur le véhicule de série
Véhicule testé non équipé mais disponible en option
Non disponible
-
i-Size
-
ISOFIX
-
Système de retenue pour enfant à dispositif universel d'ancrage
Installation sans problème
installation avec précaution
problème critique de sécurité
installation non autorisée
Position de siège | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Avant | 2e rangée | |||
Passager | Gauche | Centre | Droite | |
Maxi Cosi 2way Pearl & 2wayFix (rearward) (iSize) | ||||
Maxi Cosi 2way Pearl & 2wayFix (forward) (iSize) | ||||
BeSafe iZi Kid X2 i-Size (iSize) | ||||
BeSafe iZi Flex FIX i-Size (iSize) | ||||
Maxi Cosi Cabriofix & FamilyFix (ISOFIX) | ||||
BeSafe iZi Kid X4 ISOfix (ISOFIX) | ||||
Britax Römer Duo Plus (ISOFIX) | ||||
Britax Römer KidFix XP (ISOFIX) | ||||
Maxi Cosi Cabriofix (Belt) | ||||
Maxi Cosi Cabriofix & EasyBase2 (Belt) | ||||
Britax Römer King II LS (Belt) | ||||
Britax Römer KidFix XP (Belt) |
Installation sans problème
installation avec précaution
problème critique de sécurité
installation non autorisée
In the frontal offset test, protection was good or adequate for all critical body areas of both the 6 and 10 year dummies. In the side barrier test, maximum points were scored with all body regions well protected. The front passenger airbag can be disabled to allow a rearward-facing child restraint to e used in that seating position. Clear information is provided to the driver regarding the status of the airbag and the system was rewarded. All of the restraint types for which the RAV4 is designed could be properly installed and accommodated in the car.
- Bon
- Satisfaisant
- Moyen
- Faible
- Médiocre

Choc à la tête 17,6 Pts
Choc au bassin 6,0 Pts
Choc aux jambes 6,0 Pts
Nom du système | Pre-Collision System as part of Toyota Safety Sense | |||
Type | Auto-Brake with Forward Collision Warning | |||
Opérationnel à compter de/du | 10 km/h | |||
Performances | | ||||
Fonction de freinage automatique |
-
Cycliste traversant la route
-
Cycliste le long de la route
The protection provided by the bonnet to the head of a struck pedestrian was good or adequate over almost the entire surface. The bumper provided good protection to pedestrians' legs at all test locations, and maximum points were also scored for protection of the pelvis. The AEB system of the RAV4 can detect vulnerable road users as well as other vehicles, and performed well in tests of its reaction to pedestrians and to cyclists.
- Bon
- Satisfaisant
- Moyen
- Faible
- Médiocre
Nom du système | Dynamic Radar Cruise Control with Road Sign Assist as part of Toyota Safety Sense |
Fonction d'information de limitation de vitesse | Camera based |
Fonction de contrôle de vitesse | System advised (accurate to 5km/h) |
S'applique à | Not available | ||
Alerte | Siège conducteur | passager(s) avant | passager(s) arrière |
Visuelle | |||
Sonore | |||
Détection des occupants | |||
|
Nom du système | Lane Departure Alert with steering control as part of Toyota Safety Sense |
Type | LKA (including LDW) |
Opérationnel à compter de/du | 50 km/h |
Performances | |
Assistance au maintien sur la voie | |
Interface Homme-Machine |
Nom du système | Pre-Collision System as part of Toyota Safety Sense | |||
Type | Autonomous Emergency Braking and Forward Collision Warning | |||
Opérationnel à compter de/du | 10 km/h |
The RAV4 has a seatbelt reminder system for the front and rear seats as standard. The speed assistance system uses a camera to determine the local speed limit. The limit is presented to the driver and offers the opportunity to set the limiter to the speed shown. The lane support system helps to prevent inadvertent drifting out of lane, and also intervenes in some more critical situations. In tests of its functionality at highway speeds, the AEB system performed well, with collisions avoided or mitigated in almost all scenarios.
- Caractéristiques
- Équipement de sécurité
- Vidéos
- Validité de la notation
Caractéristiques
Modèle testé Toyota RAV4 Hybrid AWD, LHD
Type de carrosserie - 5 door SUV
Année de production 2019
Poids en ordre de marche 1730kg
NIV à partir duquel la notation s'applique - all RAV4s
Catégorie Petit SUV
Équipement de sécurité
Remarque : d'autres équipements peuvent être disponibles sur le véhicule mais n'ont pas été pris en compte dans l'année de test.
Monté sur le véhicule de série
Monté sur la voiture en tant qu'élément du pack sécurité
Pas monté sur le véhicule test mais disponible en tant qu'option ou élément du pack sécurité
Non disponible
Non applicable
Vidéos
Validité de la notation
Variantes de la gamme de modèles
Body Type | Engine & Transmission | Drivetrain | Rating Applies | |
---|---|---|---|---|
LHD | RHD | |||
5 door SUV | 2.5l petrol hybrid | 4 x 2 | ![]() |
![]() |
5 door SUV | 2.5l petrol hybrid | 4 x 4* | ![]() |
![]() |
5 door SUV | 2.0l petrol | 4 x 2 | ![]() |
![]() |
5 door SUV | 2.0l petrol | 4 x 4 | ![]() |
![]() |
5 door SUV | 2.5l petrol plug-in hybrid | 4 x 4 | ![]() |
![]() |
* Tested variant




Pour plus d’informations, veuillez consulter la section Commentaires généraux de l’évaluation

The passenger compartment of the RAV4 remained stable in the frontal offset test. Dummy readings indicated good protection of the knees and femurs of the driver and passenger. Toyota showed that a similar level of protection would be provided to occupants of different sizes and to those sitting in different positions. In the full-width rigid barrier test, protection of critical body areas was good or adequate for both the driver and rear passenger. In the side barrier test, dummy readings indicated good protection of all critical body areas. The same was true of the more severe side pole test, but the curtain airbag caught on part of the interior trim and was judged not to have deployed correctly. As a result, protection of the head was down-graded from good to adequate in both the side impact tests. Tests on the front seats and head restraints demonstrated good protection against whiplash injury in the event of rear-end collision. A geometric assessment of the rear seats also indicated good whiplash protection. The standard-fit autonomous emergency braking (AEB) system scored full points in tests of its functionality at low speeds, typical of city driving, with collisions avoided in all scenarios.