Pour plus d’informations, veuillez consulter la section Commentaires généraux de l’évaluation
Vous trouverez plus d’informations dans l’onglet Validité de la notation
- Plus d'info
- Plus d'info
- Plus d'info
- Plus d'info
- Bon
- Satisfaisant
- Moyen
- Faible
- Médiocre








- Bon
- Satisfaisant
- Moyen
- Faible
- Médiocre


Passager
latéral
Centre
Monté sur le véhicule de série
Véhicule testé non équipé mais disponible en option
Non disponible
-
i-Size
-
ISOFIX
-
Système de retenue pour enfant à dispositif universel d'ancrage
Installation sans problème
installation avec précaution
problème critique de sécurité
installation non autorisée
Position de siège | |||
---|---|---|---|
Avant | 2e rangée | ||
Passager | Gauche | Droite | |
Maxi Cosi 2way Pearl & 2wayFix (rearward) (iSize) | |||
Maxi Cosi 2way Pearl & 2wayFix (forward) (iSize) | |||
BeSafe iZi Kid X2 i-Size (iSize) | |||
Maxi Cosi Cabriofix & FamilyFix (ISOFIX) | |||
BeSafe iZi Kid X4 ISOfix (ISOFIX) | |||
Britax Römer Duo Plus (ISOFIX) | |||
Britax Römer KidFix XP (ISOFIX) | |||
Maxi Cosi Cabriofix (Belt) | |||
Maxi Cosi Cabriofix & EasyBase2 (Belt) | |||
Britax Römer King II LS (Belt) | |||
Britax Römer KidFix XP (Belt) |
Installation sans problème
installation avec précaution
problème critique de sécurité
installation non autorisée
In the offset frontal test, protection of the neck of the 10 year dummy was rated as weak, as was that of the chest of the 6 year dummy, based on data recorded by the dummies. In the side barrier test, protection of the chest of the 10 year dummy was poor, based on dummy readings of chest deceleration. The front passenger airbag can be disabled to allow a rearward-facing child restraint to be used in that seating position. Clear information is provided to the driver regarding the status of the airbag and the system was rewarded. Cars from VIN JTDKGNEC60N317420 have revised markings for the top-tethers. All restraint types for which the Aygo is designed could be properly installed and accommodated in the car.
- Bon
- Satisfaisant
- Moyen
- Faible
- Médiocre

Choc à la tête 16,3 Pts
Choc au bassin 4,7 Pts
Choc aux jambes 6,0 Pts
The protection provided to the head of a struck pedestrian was predominantly adequate or marginal on the bonnet surface, with poor results recorded along the base of the windscreen and on the stiff windscreen pillars. The protection provided to the pelvis was good in some areas and marginal in others, while the bumper provided good protection to pedestrians' legs. The autonomous emergency braking system works only for other cars and does not detect pedestrians.
- Bon
- Satisfaisant
- Moyen
- Faible
- Médiocre
S'applique à | All seats | ||
Alerte | Siège conducteur | passager(s) avant | passager(s) arrière |
Visuelle | |||
Sonore | |||
|
A seatbelt reminder is standard for the front and rear seats. An autonomous emergency braking system and a lane departure warning system are part of the optional safety pack and are not assessed as part of this rating.
- Caractéristiques
- Équipement de sécurité
- Vidéos
- Validité de la notation
Caractéristiques
Modèle testé Toyota Aygo 1.0 x-play, LHD
Type de carrosserie - 5 door hatchback
Année de production 2017
Poids en ordre de marche 910kg
NIV à partir duquel la notation s'applique - JTDKGNEC60N317420
Catégorie Citadine
Équipement de sécurité
Remarque : d'autres équipements peuvent être disponibles sur le véhicule mais n'ont pas été pris en compte dans l'année de test.
Monté sur le véhicule de série
Monté sur la voiture en tant qu'élément du pack sécurité
Pas monté sur le véhicule test mais disponible en tant qu'option ou élément du pack sécurité
Non disponible
Non applicable
Vidéos
Validité de la notation
Variantes de la gamme de modèles
Body Type | Engine | Drivetrain | Rating Applies | |
---|---|---|---|---|
LHD | RHD | |||
5 door hatchback | 1.0 petrol* | 4 x 2 | ![]() |
![]() |
* Tested variant


Pour plus d’informations, veuillez consulter la section Commentaires généraux de l’évaluation

The passenger compartment of the Aygo remained stable in the frontal offset test. Although dummy readings were good for the knees and femurs of both the driver and passenger, structures in the dashboard were thought to present a risk to occupants of different sizes and to those sat in different positions, so the protection provided to this part of the body was downgraded to marginal. In the full-width rigid barrier test, protection of the head, neck and chest of the rear passenger dummy was rated as poor and no points were scored for this dummy. Protection of the driver dummy in the same test was good or adequate. In both the side barrier impact and the more severe side pole test, protection of all critical parts of the body was good, and the Aygo scored maximum points. Tests on the front seats and head restraints demonstrated good whiplash protection in the event of a rear-end collision. A geometric assessment of the rear seats indicated marginal whiplash protection. The Aygo has an autonomous emergency braking system as part of an option pack, an assessment of which is not included in this rating.