How safe is your car ?

Select one or more vehicles among the following possibilities.

OR
OR
All results & rewards
Menu
With safety pack
With standard equipment
2017 Info

Toyota Aygo

City and Supermini
Rating Expired Icon Rating Expired

Share this on:
Publication: Dec 2017

Find more information in the General Comments section of the assessment

Find more information in the Rating Validity tab of the assessment

text a changé
  • Adult Occupant

    74%
    See More
  • Child Occupant

    63%
    See More
  • Pedestrian

    64%
    See More
  • Safety Assist

    25%
    See More
Total 28.3 Pts / 74%
  • Good
  • Adequate
  • Marginal
  • Weak
  • Poor
Frontal Offset Deformable Barrier
6.3 Pts
Passenger
Driver
Frontal Full Width
3.8 Pts
Rear Passenger
Driver
Lateral Impact
16.0 Pts
Car
Pole
Whiplash Rear Impact
2.2 Pts
Rear Seat
Front Seat
AEB City
0.0 Pts
Performance:
Not Available

Comments
Total 31.2 Pts / 63%
  • Good
  • Adequate
  • Marginal
  • Weak
  • Poor
Crash Test Performance based on 6 & 10 year old children 13.2 Pts
Frontal Impact
6.2 Pts
Lateral Impact
7 Pts

Restraint for 6 year old child: Britax Römer KidFix XP
Restraint for 10 year old child: Graco Maxi Junior
Q10
Q6
Q6
Q10
Safety Features 6.0 Pts
Front
Passenger
2nd row
outboard
2nd row
center
Isofix
i-Size
Integrated CRS
  • Fitted to the vehicle as standard
  • Not fitted to the test vehicle but available as option
  • Not Available
CRS Installation Check 12.0 Pts
crs
Installation
  • Easy
  • Difficult
  • Safety critical
  • Not allowed
Seat Position
Front 2nd row
Passenger Left Right
Maxi Cosi 2way Pearl & 2wayFix (rearward) (iSize)
Maxi Cosi 2way Pearl & 2wayFix (forward) (iSize)
BeSafe iZi Kid X2 i-Size (iSize)
Maxi Cosi Cabriofix & FamilyFix (ISOFIX)
BeSafe iZi Kid X4 ISOfix (ISOFIX)
Britax Römer Duo Plus (ISOFIX)
Britax Römer KidFix XP (ISOFIX)
Maxi Cosi Cabriofix (Belt)
Maxi Cosi Cabriofix & EasyBase2 (Belt)
Britax Römer King II LS (Belt)
Britax Römer KidFix XP (Belt)
  • Easy
  • Difficult
  • Safety critical
  • Not allowed
Detailed Test Results
Comments
Total 27.0 Pts / 64%
  • Good
  • Adequate
  • Marginal
  • Weak
  • Poor
VRU Impact Protection
27.0 Pts
VRU Impact Protection

Head Impact 16.3 Pts

Pelvis Impact 4.7 Pts

Leg Impact 6.0 Pts

AEB Pedestrian 0.0 Pts
Comments
Total 3.0 Pts / 25%
  • Good
  • Adequate
  • Marginal
  • Weak
  • Poor
Speed Assistance 0 Pts
Seatbelt Reminder 3.0 Pts
Applies To All seats
Warning Driver Seat Front Passenger(s) Rear Passenger(s)
Visual
Audible
  • Pass
  • Fail
  • Not available
Lane Support 0 Pts
AEB Inter-Urban 0 Pts
Comments
  • Specifications
  • Safety Equipment
  • Videos
  • Rating Validity

Specifications

Tested Model Toyota Aygo 1.0 x-play, LHD

Body Type - 5 door hatchback

Year Of Publication 2017

Kerb Weight 910kg

VIN From Which Rating Applies - JTDKGNEC60N317420

Class City and Supermini

Safety Equipment

Driver
Passenger
Rear
FRONTAL CRASH PROTECTION
Front Airbag
Driver
Passenger
Rear
Belt Pretensioner
Driver
Passenger
Rear
Belt Loadlimiter
Driver
Passenger
Rear
Knee Airbag
Driver
Passenger
Rear
LATERAL CRASH PROTECTION
Side Head Airbag
Driver
Passenger
Rear
Side Chest Airbag
Driver
Passenger
Rear
Side Pelvis Airbag
Driver
Passenger
Rear
CHILD PROTECTION
Isofix/i-Size
Driver
Passenger
Rear
Integrated Child Seat
Driver
Passenger
Rear
Airbag cut-off switch
Driver
Passenger
Rear
SAFETY ASSIST
Seatbelt Reminder
Driver
Passenger
Rear
OTHER SAFETY SYSTEMS
Active Bonnet
Active Bonnet
AEB Pedestrian
AEB Pedestrian
AEB City
AEB City
AEB Interurban
AEB Interurban
Speed Assistance
Speed Assistance
Lane Assist System
Lane Assist System

Note: Other equipment may be available on the vehicle but was not considered in the test year.

  • Fitted to the vehicle as standard
  • Fitted to the vehicle as part of the safety pack
  • Not fitted to the test vehicle but available as option or as part of the safety pack
  • Not available
  • Not applicable

Videos

Rating Validity

Variants of Model Range

Body Type Engine Drivetrain Rating Applies
      LHD RHD
5 door hatchback 1.0 petrol* 4 x 2 yes yes

* Tested variant

Annual Reviews and Facelifts

Date
Event
Outcome
December 2017
Rating Published
2017

Find more information in the General Comments section of the assessment



Share

Subscribe for our latest news