Find more information in the General Comments section of the assessment
Find more information in the Rating Validity tab of the assessment
-
Plus d'info
![]()
61% -
Plus d'info
![]()
74% -
Plus d'info
![]()
68% -
Plus d'info
![]()
38%
- Bon
- Satisfaisant
- Moyen
- Faible
- Médiocre
Passager
Conducteur
Siège arrière
Siège avant
Voiture
Poteau
- Bon
- Satisfaisant
- Moyen
- Faible
- Médiocre
Passager
latéral
Centre
![]()
Monté sur le véhicule de série![]()
Véhicule testé non équipé mais disponible en option![]()
Non disponible
Véhicule testé non équipé mais disponible en option-
bébés jusqu'à 13 kg
-
bébés et jeunes enfants jusqu'à 18 kg
-
Jeunes enfants de 9 à 18 kg
-
Petits enfants de plus de 18 kg
![]()
Installation sans problème![]()
installation avec précaution![]()
problème critique de sécurité![]()
installation non autorisée
installation avec précaution
problème critique de sécurité| Position de siège | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Avant | 2e rangée | |||
| Passager | Gauche | Centre | Droite | |
| Maxi Cosi Cabriofix (Belt) | |
|
|
|
| Britax Römer King Plus (Belt) | |
|
|
|
| Britax Römer Duo Plus (ISOFIX) | |
|
|
|
| Britax Römer KidFix (Belt) | |
|
|
|
| Maxi Cosi Cabriofix & EasyFix (Belt) | |
|
|
|
| Maxi Cosi Cabriofix & EasyFix (ISOFIX) | |
|
|
|
| BeSafe iZi Kid X3 ISOfix (ISOFIX) | |
|
|
|
| Maxi Cosi Pearl & Familyfix (ISOFIX) | |
|
|
|
| Britax Römer KidFix (ISOFIX) | |
|
|
|
![]()
Installation sans problème![]()
installation avec précaution![]()
problème critique de sécurité![]()
installation non autorisée
Based on dummy readings from the dynamic tests, maximum points were scored for protection of the 1½ year dummy, sat in a rearward-facing restraint. Forward movement of the head of the 3 year dummy, sat in a forward-facing restraint, was not excessive. However, forces measured in the neck and chest indicated poor protection of these areas and the deceleration of the head showed marginal protection. The front passenger airbag can be disabled to allow a rearward-facing child restraint to be used in that seating position. Clear information is provided to the driver regarding the status of the airbag and the system was rewarded. All of the restraints for which the car is designed could be properly installed and accommodated in the vehicle.
- Bon
- Satisfaisant
- Moyen
- Faible
- Médiocre
Choc à la tête 18,1 Pts
Choc au bassin 0,8 Pts
Choc aux jambes 6,0 Pts
The Celerio scored maximum points for the protection provided by its bumper to pedestrians' legs. However, the front edge of the bonnet was almost entirely poor in its protection of the pelvis area. The bonnet surface offered predominantly good or adequate protection to a pedestrian's head, with poor results recorded only on the stiff windscreen pillars.
- Bon
- Satisfaisant
- Moyen
- Faible
- Médiocre
| Nom du système | ESP | |
| Performances | ||
| S'applique à | Front seats | ||
| Alerte | Siège conducteur | passager(s) avant | passager(s) arrière |
| Visuelle | |
|
 |
| Sonore | |
|
|
|
|||
The Celerio has electronic stability control as standard equipment, together with a seatbelt reminder system for the front seats only. The Celerio does not have a speed-limiter, a lane-keeping assist system or autonomous emergency braking.
- Caractéristiques
- Équipement de sécurité
- Vidéos
- Validité de la notation
Caractéristiques
Modèle testé Suzuki Celerio 1.0 petrol GL, LHD
Type de carrosserie - 5 door hatchback
Année de production 2014
Poids en ordre de marche 823kg
NIV à partir duquel la notation s'applique - applies to all Celerios of the specification tested
Catégorie Citadine
Équipement de sécurité
Remarque : d'autres équipements peuvent être disponibles sur le véhicule mais n'ont pas été pris en compte dans l'année de test.
![]()
Monté sur le véhicule de série![]()
Monté sur le véhicule en option![]()
Véhicule testé non équipé mais disponible en option![]()
Non disponible![]()
Non applicable
Monté sur le véhicule en optionVidéos
Validité de la notation
Find more information in the General Comments section of the assessment
Partager
The passenger compartment remained stable in the frontal impact. Dummy readings indicated good protection of the knees and femurs of the driver and passenger. Suzuki showed that a similar level of protection would be availabe to occupants of different sizes and to those sat in different positions. Readings from the lower legs of the driver dummy indicated a marginal level of protection for this part of the body. In the side barrier test, the Celerio scored maximum points, with good protection of all body areas. A head-protecting side impact airbag is available as an option on the Celerio. As it is not standard equipment, the car did not qualify for assessment in the side pole test and no points were awarded. Protection against whiplash injuries in the event of a rear-end collision was rated as good for the front seats but a geomatric analysis of the rear seats indicated a poor level of protection.