- With standard equipment
- With safety pack
Pour plus d’informations, veuillez consulter la section Commentaires généraux de l’évaluation
Vous trouverez plus d’informations dans l’onglet Validité de la notation
- Plus d'info
- Plus d'info
- Plus d'info
- Plus d'info
- Bon
- Satisfaisant
- Moyen
- Faible
- Médiocre








-
A l’approche d’une voiture à l'arrêt: Décalage à gauche
-
A l’approche d’une voiture à l'arrêt: Pas de décalage
-
A l’approche d’une voiture à l'arrêt: Décalage à droite
- Bon
- Satisfaisant
- Moyen
- Faible
- Médiocre


Passager
latéral
Centre
Monté sur le véhicule de série
Véhicule testé non équipé mais disponible en option
Non disponible
-
i-Size
-
ISOFIX
-
Système de retenue pour enfant à dispositif universel d'ancrage
Installation sans problème
installation avec précaution
problème critique de sécurité
installation non autorisée
Position de siège | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Avant | 2e rangée | |||
Passager | Gauche | Centre | Droite | |
Maxi Cosi 2way Pearl & 2wayFix (rearward) (iSize) | ||||
Maxi Cosi 2way Pearl & 2wayFix (forward) (iSize) | ||||
BeSafe iZi Kid X2 i-Size (iSize) | ||||
BeSafe iZi Flex FIT i-Size (iSize) | ||||
Maxi Cosi Cabriofix & FamilyFix (ISOFIX) | ||||
BeSafe iZi Kid X4 ISOfix (ISOFIX) | ||||
Britax Römer Duo Plus (ISOFIX) | ||||
Britax Römer KidFix XP (ISOFIX) | ||||
Maxi Cosi Cabriofix (Belt) | ||||
Maxi Cosi Cabriofix & EasyBase2 (Belt) | ||||
Britax Römer King II LS (Belt) | ||||
Britax Römer KidFix XP (Belt) |
Installation sans problème
installation avec précaution
problème critique de sécurité
installation non autorisée
In the frontal offset test, protection of the six-year dummy was good for all critical body areas. For the ten-year-old, dummy readings of neck tension indicated marginal protection for this body region, but protection elsewhere was good. In the side barrier test, protection of all critical parts of the body was good for both child dummies. The front passenger airbag can be disabled to allow a rearward-facing child restraint to be used in that seating position. Clear information is provided to the driver regarding the status of the airbag and the system was rewarded. All restraint types for which the Korando is designed could be properly installed and accommodated in the car.
- Bon
- Satisfaisant
- Moyen
- Faible
- Médiocre

Choc à la tête 17,1 Pts
Choc au bassin 2,9 Pts
Choc aux jambes 6,0 Pts
Nom du système | Autonomous Emergency Braking | |||
Type | Auto-Brake with Forward Collision Warning | |||
Opérationnel à compter de/du | 8 km/h | |||
Performances | | ||||
Fonction de freinage automatique |
-
Cycliste traversant la route
-
Cycliste le long de la route
The protection provided to the head of a struck pedestrian was good or adequate over most of the bonnet surface, with poor results recorded at the base of the windscreen and on the stiff windscreen pillars. Protection of pedestrians' legs was good at all test locations but protection of the pelvis was mixed. The AEB system of the Korando can detect vulnerable road users like pedestrians and cyclists, as well as other vehicles. In tests of its response to pedestrians, the system performed adequately. The system's reaction to cyclists was rated as marginal.
- Bon
- Satisfaisant
- Moyen
- Faible
- Médiocre
Nom du système | Speed Assistance System |
Fonction d'information de limitation de vitesse | Camera based |
Fonction de contrôle de vitesse | Manually set (accurate to 5km/h) |
S'applique à | All Seats | ||
Alerte | Siège conducteur | passager(s) avant | passager(s) arrière |
Visuelle | |||
Sonore | |||
Détection des occupants | |||
|
Nom du système | Lane Support System |
Type | ELK + LKA (including LDW) |
Opérationnel à compter de/du | 60 km/h |
Performances | |
Système de maintien d’urgence dans la voie | |
Assistance au maintien sur la voie | |
Interface Homme-Machine |
Nom du système | Autonomous Emergency Braking | |||
Type | Autonomous Emergency Braking and Forward Collision Warning | |||
Opérationnel à compter de/du | 8 km/h |
The AEB system performed well in tests of its response to other vehicles at highway speeds, with collisions avoided in almost all test scenarios. A seatbelt reminder system is standard for the front and rear seats. A camera-based speed limit recognition system presents the information the driver, allowing the speed limiter to be set appropriately. The lane support system helps to prevent inadvertent drifting out of lane and also intervenes more aggressively in certain critical situations.
- Caractéristiques
- Équipement de sécurité
- Vidéos
- Validité de la notation
Caractéristiques
Modèle testé SsangYong Korando 1.6 diesel, LHD
Type de carrosserie - 5 door SUV
Année de production 2019
Poids en ordre de marche 1728kg
NIV à partir duquel la notation s'applique - all Korandos including e-Motion
Catégorie Petite familiale
Équipement de sécurité
Remarque : d'autres équipements peuvent être disponibles sur le véhicule mais n'ont pas été pris en compte dans l'année de test.
Monté sur le véhicule de série
Monté sur la voiture en tant qu'élément du pack sécurité
Pas monté sur le véhicule test mais disponible en tant qu'option ou élément du pack sécurité
Non disponible
Non applicable
Vidéos
Validité de la notation
Variantes de la gamme de modèles
Body Type | Engine | Drivetrain | Rating Applies | |
---|---|---|---|---|
LHD | RHD | |||
5 door SUV | 1.6 diesel | 4 x 2 | ![]() |
![]() |
5 door SUV | 1.6 diesel* | 4 x 4 | ![]() |
![]() |
5 door SUV | 1.5 petrol | 4 x 2 | ![]() |
![]() |
5 door SUV | 1.5 petrol | 4 x 4 | ![]() |
![]() |
5 door SUV | electric motor# | 4 x 2 | ![]() |
![]() |
* Tested variant
#Additional tests performed




Pour plus d’informations, veuillez consulter la section Commentaires généraux de l’évaluation

The passenger compartment of the Korando remained stable in the frontal offset test. Dummy readings indicated good protection of the knees and femurs for both driver and passenger. SsangYong showed that a similar level of protection would be provided to occupants of different sizes and to those sitting in different positions. In the full-width rigid barrier test, protection of the driver dummy was good or adequate. For the rear dummy, readings indicated a drop in the iliac force, indicating that the pelvis had slipped underneath the lap section of the seatbelt, a phenomenon known as 'submarining'. Although dummy readings did not indicate a high risk of injury, the car was penalised and protection of the pelvis rated as poor. in the side barrier test, protection of all critical body areas was good and the Korando scored maximum points. In the more severe side pole impact, dummy readings of rib deflection indicated marginal protection of the chest, while that of other critical body areas was good. Tests on the front seats and head restraints demonstrated good protection against whiplash injuries in the event of a rear-end collision. A geometric assessment of the rear seats indicated marginal whiplash protection. The standard-fit autonomous emergency braking (AEB) system scored maximum points in tests of its functionality at the low speeds at which many whiplash injuries occur, with car-to-car collisions avoided in all test scenarios.