Pour plus d’informations, veuillez consulter la section Commentaires généraux de l’évaluation
Vous trouverez plus d’informations dans l’onglet Validité de la notation
-
Plus d'info
![]()
94% -
Plus d'info
![]()
80% -
Plus d'info
![]()
69% -
Plus d'info
![]()
71%
- Bon
- Satisfaisant
- Moyen
- Faible
- Médiocre
Passager
Conducteur
Siège avant
Voiture
Poteau
- Bon
- Satisfaisant
- Moyen
- Faible
- Médiocre
Passager
latéral
Centre
![]()
Monté sur le véhicule de série![]()
Véhicule testé non équipé mais disponible en option![]()
Non disponible
Véhicule testé non équipé mais disponible en optionBased on dummy reading in the dynamic crash tests, maximum points were scored for protection of the 3 year infant. Forward movement of that dummy in the frontal impact test was not excessive and, in the side impact, both dummies were properly contained by their restraints, minimising the likelihood of head contact with parts of the car's interior. The passenger airbag can be disabled to allow a rearward-facing restraint to be used in that seating position. However, information provided to the driver regarding the status of the airbag is not clear and the system was not rewarded. There is inadequate warning of the dangers of using a rearward-facing restraint without first disabling the airbag.
- Bon
- Satisfaisant
- Moyen
- Faible
- Médiocre
Choc à la tête 16,6 Pts
Choc au bassin 2,1 Pts
Choc aux jambes 6,0 Pts
The bumper provided good protection for pedestrians' legs and scored maximum points. In most areas where a child's head might strike the bonnet, good protection was provided but the protection was predominantly poor in those areas likely to be struck by an adult's head.
- Bon
- Satisfaisant
- Moyen
- Faible
- Médiocre
| Nom du système | ASC | |
| Performances | ||
| Taux d'embardée du véhicule à COS + 1.00 s | 0% | Répond aux exigences de la CEE |
| Taux d'embardée du véhicule à COS + 1.75 s | 0% | Répond aux exigences de la CEE |
| Déplacement latéral à BOS + 1.07 s | 3.01 m | Répond aux exigences de la CEE |
| S'applique à | Front seats | ||
| Alerte | Siège conducteur | passager(s) avant | passager(s) arrière |
| Visuelle | |
|
 |
| Sonore | |
|
|
|
|||
ÉchoueElectronic stability control is standard equipment. All Toledos have a driver and front passenger seatbelt reminder as standard. There is no rear seatbelt reminder or speed limitation device.
- Caractéristiques
- Équipement de sécurité
- Vidéos
- Validité de la notation
Caractéristiques
Modèle testé Car tested: Skoda Rapid 1.2TSI 'Ambition', LHD
Type de carrosserie - 5 door hatchback
Année de production 2012
Poids en ordre de marche 1093kg
NIV à partir duquel la notation s'applique - applies to all Toledos of the specification tested
Catégorie Petite familiale
Équipement de sécurité
Remarque : d'autres équipements peuvent être disponibles sur le véhicule mais n'ont pas été pris en compte dans l'année de test.
![]()
Monté sur le véhicule de série![]()
Monté sur le véhicule en option![]()
Véhicule testé non équipé mais disponible en option![]()
Non disponible![]()
Non applicable
Monté sur le véhicule en optionVidéos
Validité de la notation
Pour plus d’informations, veuillez consulter la section Commentaires généraux de l’évaluation
The Seat Toledo has been scrutinised by Euro NCAP and the car is structurally identical to the Skoda Rapid and has the same interior fittings. Seat has informed Euro NCAP that the Toledo also has the same levels of safety equipment as the Rapid. Accordingly, Euro NCAP believes that the star rating of the Skoda Rapid can also be applied to the Seat Toledo
Partager
The passenger compartment remained stable in the frontal impact. The car scored maximum points for its protection of the front passenger. Readings for both front seat dummies indicated good protection of the knees and femurs and it was demonstrated that a similar level of protection would be available to occupants of different sizes and to those sat in different positions. Maximum points were scored for protection of the driver in the side barrier test. In the more severe side pole test, protection of most body regions was good and that of the chest was adequate. The seat and head restraint provided marginal protection against whiplash in the event of a rear-end collision.