-
Plus d'info
![]()
71% -
Plus d'info
![]()
75% -
Plus d'info
![]()
54% -
Plus d'info
![]()
33%
- Bon
- Satisfaisant
- Moyen
- Faible
- Médiocre
Passager
Conducteur
Siège avant
Siège arrière
Voiture
Poteau
- Bon
- Satisfaisant
- Moyen
- Faible
- Médiocre
Passager
latéral
Centre
![]()
Monté sur le véhicule de série![]()
Véhicule testé non équipé mais disponible en option![]()
Non disponible
Véhicule testé non équipé mais disponible en option-
bébés jusqu'à 13 kg
-
bébés et jeunes enfants jusqu'à 18 kg
-
Jeunes enfants de 9 à 18 kg
-
Petits enfants de plus de 18 kg
![]()
Installation sans problème![]()
installation avec précaution![]()
problème critique de sécurité![]()
installation non autorisée
installation avec précaution
problème critique de sécurité| Position de siège | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Avant | 2e rangée | |||
| Passager | Gauche | Centre | Droite | |
| Maxi Cosi Cabriofix (Belt) | |
|
|
|
| Römer King Plus (Belt) | |
|
|
|
| Römer Duo Plus (ISOFIX) | |
|
|
|
| Römer KidFix (Belt) | |
|
|
|
| Maxi Cosi Cabriofix & EasyFix (Belt) | |
|
|
|
| Maxi Cosi Cabriofix & EasyFix (ISOFIX) | |
|
|
|
| BeSafe iZi Kid X3 ISOfix (ISOFIX) | |
|
|
|
| Maxi Cosi Pearl & Familyfix (ISOFIX) | |
|
|
|
| Römer KidFix (ISOFIX) | |
|
|
|
![]()
Installation sans problème![]()
installation avec précaution![]()
problème critique de sécurité![]()
installation non autorisée
In the frontal impact, forward movement of the 3 year dummy, sat in a forward-facing restraint, was not excessive but neck loads were quite high. Chest deceleration of the 1½ year dummy was also a little high and protection was rated as fair. In the side impact, both dummies were properly contained by the protective shells of their restraints, minimising the likelihood of head contact with pats of the car's interior. The front passenger airbag can be disabled to allow a rearward-facing child restraint to be used in that seating position. However, the switch, located at the end of the facia, is not labelled clearly enough and the system was not rewarded. All of the restraints which the car is designed to accommodate could be properly installed in the vehicle.
- Bon
- Satisfaisant
- Moyen
- Faible
- Médiocre
Choc à la tête 13.6 Pts
Choc au bassin 0 Pts
Choc aux jambes 6 Pts
The protection provided by the bumper to pedestrians' legs was good in all areas tested. However, the front edge of the bonnet was poor and scored no points. The protection provided by the bonnet was predominantly good or adequate but was poor at the base of the windscreen and on the stiff windscreen pillars.
- Bon
- Satisfaisant
- Moyen
- Faible
- Médiocre
| Nom du système | ESP | |
| Performances | ||
| S'applique à | Not available | ||
| Alerte | Siège conducteur | passager(s) avant | passager(s) arrière |
| Visuelle | |
 |
|
| Sonore | |
|
|
|
|||
Electronic stability control is fitted as standard. A seatbelt reminder is standard for the driver's seat but is not available for the passenger seat so the system was not rewarded. A driver-set speed limiter is available as an option. As it is fitted to most cars sold, it was assessed and met Euro NCAP's requirements for systems of this type. Neither lane assist nor autonomous emergency braking are available.
- Caractéristiques
- Équipement de sécurité
- Vidéos
- Évaluations annuelles et nouvelles versions
Caractéristiques
Modèle testé Citroën C-Elysée 1.2 Séduction, LHD
Type de carrosserie - 4 door sedan
Année de production 2014
Poids en ordre de marche 1044kg
NIV à partir duquel la notation s'applique - applies to all Peugeot 301s of the specification listed
Catégorie Petite familiale
Équipement de sécurité
Remarque : d'autres équipements peuvent être disponibles sur le véhicule mais n'ont pas été pris en compte dans l'année de test.
![]()
Monté sur le véhicule de série![]()
Monté sur le véhicule en option![]()
Véhicule testé non équipé mais disponible en option![]()
Non disponible![]()
Non applicable
Monté sur le véhicule en optionVidéos
Évaluations annuelles et nouvelles versions
The Peugeot 301 is identical to the Citroën C-Elysée. Data provided by Peugeot-Citroën shows that the results of the tests done on the Citroën would apply also to the Peugeot 301. The comments below are based on tests done on the C-Elysée
Partager
The passenger compartment remained stable in the frontal impact. Dummy readings indicated good protection of the knees and femurs of the driver and passenger in the test. However, structures in the dashboard posed a risk of injury to occupants of different sizes and to those sat in different positions and the score was downgraded. Readings of chest compression in the driver dummy indicated a marginal level of protection for this body region. In the side impact, protection of all body regions was good, except for the abdomen, protection of which was adequate. However, in the more severe side pole impact, dummy readings of chest compression indicated a weak level of protection for this body region. The score was penalised because some forces were transmitted through parts of the dummy structure which would further load the chest of a human, and protection of the chest area was rated as poor. Protection against whiplash injury in a rear-end collision was good for the front seats but poor for the rear seats.