- With standard equipment
- With safety pack
Pour plus d’informations, veuillez consulter la section Commentaires généraux de l’évaluation
Vous trouverez plus d’informations dans l’onglet Validité de la notation
- Plus d'info
- Plus d'info
- Plus d'info
- Plus d'info
- Bon
- Satisfaisant
- Moyen
- Faible
- Médiocre








-
A l’approche d’une voiture à l'arrêt: Décalage à gauche
-
A l’approche d’une voiture à l'arrêt: Pas de décalage
-
A l’approche d’une voiture à l'arrêt: Décalage à droite
- Bon
- Satisfaisant
- Moyen
- Faible
- Médiocre


Passager
latéral
Centre
Monté sur le véhicule de série
Véhicule testé non équipé mais disponible en option
Non disponible
-
i-Size
-
ISOFIX
-
Système de retenue pour enfant à dispositif universel d'ancrage
Installation sans problème
installation avec précaution
problème critique de sécurité
installation non autorisée
Position de siège | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Avant | 2e rangée | |||
Passager | Gauche | Centre | Droite | |
Maxi Cosi 2way Pearl & 2wayFix (rearward) (iSize) | ||||
Maxi Cosi 2way Pearl & 2wayFix (forward) (iSize) | ||||
BeSafe iZi Kid X2 i-Size (iSize) | ||||
BeSafe iZi Flex FIT i-Size (iSize) | ||||
Maxi Cosi Cabriofix & FamilyFix (ISOFIX) | ||||
BeSafe iZi Kid X4 ISOfix (ISOFIX) | ||||
Britax Römer Duo Plus (ISOFIX) | ||||
Britax Römer KidFix XP (ISOFIX) | ||||
Maxi Cosi Cabriofix (Belt) | ||||
Maxi Cosi Cabriofix & EasyBase2 (Belt) | ||||
Britax Römer King II LS (Belt) | ||||
Britax Römer KidFix XP (Belt) |
Installation sans problème
installation avec précaution
problème critique de sécurité
installation non autorisée
In the frontal test, protection of all critical body areas was good or adequate for both dummies. In the side barrier impact, all critical body areas were well protected for both dummies and the Juke scored maximum points in this part of the assessment. The front passenger airbag can be disabled to allow a rearward-facing child restraint to be used in that seating position. Clear information is provided to the driver regarding the status of the airbag and the system was rewarded. All of the restraint types for which the Juke is designed could be properly installed and accommodated in the car.
- Bon
- Satisfaisant
- Moyen
- Faible
- Médiocre

Choc à la tête 15,1 Pts
Choc au bassin 6,0 Pts
Choc aux jambes 6,0 Pts
Nom du système | Intelligent Emergency Braking (IEB) | |||
Type | Auto-Brake with Forward Collision Warning | |||
Opérationnel à compter de/du | 5 km/h | |||
Performances | | ||||
Fonction de freinage automatique |
-
Cycliste traversant la route
-
Cycliste le long de la route
The bonnet provided predominantly good or adequate protection to the head of a struck pedestrian, with a few poor results recorded on the stiff windscreen pillars. The bumper provided good protection to pedestrians' legs and protection of the pelvis was also good at all test locations, and the Juke scored maximum points in these tests. The Juke's AEB system can detect vulnerable road users like pedestrians and cyclists, as well as other vehicles. In tests, the system's response to cyclists was good and to pedestrians was adequate, with collisions avoided or mitigated in most cases.
- Bon
- Satisfaisant
- Moyen
- Faible
- Médiocre
Nom du système | Speed Limiter/Traffic Sign Recognition |
Fonction d'information de limitation de vitesse | Camera based |
Fonction de contrôle de vitesse | Manually set (accurate to 5km/h) |
S'applique à | All Seats | ||
Alerte | Siège conducteur | passager(s) avant | passager(s) arrière |
Visuelle | |||
Sonore | |||
Détection des occupants | |||
|
Nom du système | Intelligent Lane Intervention (ILI) |
Type | LKA (including LDW) |
Opérationnel à compter de/du | 55 km/h |
Performances | |
Assistance au maintien sur la voie | |
Interface Homme-Machine |
Nom du système | Intelligent Emergency Braking (IEB) | |||
Type | Autonomous Emergency Braking and Forward Collision Warning | |||
Opérationnel à compter de/du | 5 km/h | |||
Informations supplémentaires | Supplementary warning |
The Juke has a seatbelt reminder system for the front and rear seats. The AEB system performed well in tests of its response to other vehicles at highway speeds. A lane support system helps to prevent inadvertent drifting out of lane, as well as intervening more aggressively in some critical situations. The speed assistance system uses a camera to identify local speed limits. This information is presented to the driver who can then set the speed limiter as appropriate.
- Caractéristiques
- Équipement de sécurité
- Vidéos
- Validité de la notation
Caractéristiques
Modèle testé Nissan Juke, DIG-T 117, N-Connecta, LHD
Type de carrosserie - 5 door hatchback
Année de production 2019
Poids en ordre de marche 1212kg
NIV à partir duquel la notation s'applique - all Jukes, including hybrid
Catégorie Petit SUV
Équipement de sécurité
Remarque : d'autres équipements peuvent être disponibles sur le véhicule mais n'ont pas été pris en compte dans l'année de test.
Monté sur le véhicule de série
Monté sur la voiture en tant qu'élément du pack sécurité
Pas monté sur le véhicule test mais disponible en tant qu'option ou élément du pack sécurité
Non disponible
Non applicable
Vidéos
Validité de la notation
Variantes de la gamme de modèles
Body Type | Engine | Drivetrain | Rating Applies | |
---|---|---|---|---|
LHD | RHD | |||
5 door SUV | 1.0 petrol* | 4 x 2 | ![]() |
![]() |
5 door SUV | 1.6 petrol hybrid** | 4 x 2 | ![]() |
![]() |
* Tested variant
** Additional tests performed




Pour plus d’informations, veuillez consulter la section Commentaires généraux de l’évaluation

The passenger compartment of the Juke remained stable in the frontal offset test. Dummy readings indicated good protection of the knees and femurs of the driver and passenger. Nissan showed that a similar level of protection would be provided to occupants of different sizes and to those sitting in different positions. Protection of the front passenger was good for all critical body areas. In the full-width rigid barrier test, protection of all critical body regions was good or adequate for both the driver and rear passenger. In the side barrier impact, protection of all critical body areas was good and the car scored full points in this test. In the more severe side pole test, protection of the chest was rated as adequate, with good protection of other parts of the body. Tests on the front seats and head restraints demonstrated good protection against whiplash injuries in the event of a rear-end collision. A geometric assessment of the rear seats also indicated good whiplash protection. The standard-fit autonomous emergency braking (AEB) system performed well in tests of its functionality at the low speeds at which many whiplash injuries occur, with collisions avoided in most test scenarios.