- With standard equipment
- With safety pack
Pour plus d’informations, veuillez consulter la section Commentaires généraux de l’évaluation
Vous trouverez plus d’informations dans l’onglet Validité de la notation
- Plus d'info
- Plus d'info
- Plus d'info
- Plus d'info
- Bon
- Satisfaisant
- Moyen
- Faible
- Médiocre


- Bon
- Satisfaisant
- Moyen
- Faible
- Médiocre


Passager
latéral
Centre
Monté sur le véhicule de série
Véhicule testé non équipé mais disponible en option
Non disponible
-
i-Size
-
ISOFIX
-
Système de retenue pour enfant à dispositif universel d'ancrage
Installation sans problème
installation avec précaution
problème critique de sécurité
installation non autorisée
Position de siège | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Avant | 2e rangée | |||
Passager | Gauche | Centre | Droite | |
Maxi Cosi 2way Pearl & 2wayFix (i-Size) | ||||
Maxi Cosi 2way Pearl & 2wayFix (i-Size) | ||||
BeSafe iZi Kid X2 i-Size (i-Size) | ||||
Britax Römer TriFix2 i-Size (i-Size) | ||||
BeSafe iZi Flex FIX i-Size (i-Size) | ||||
BeSafe iZi Combi X4 ISOfix (ISOFIX) | ||||
Cybex Solution Z i-Fix (ISOFIX) | ||||
Maxi Cosi Cabriofix (Belt) | ||||
Maxi Cosi Cabriofix & EasyFix (Belt) | ||||
Britax Römer King II LS (Belt) | ||||
Cybex Solution Z i-Fix (Belt) |
Installation sans problème
installation avec précaution
problème critique de sécurité
installation non autorisée
The ET7 provided good protection for all critical body regions of both the 6 and 10 year dummies in the frontal offset and side barrier tests, and scored maximum points in this part of the assessment. The front passenger airbag can be disabled to allow a rearward-facing child restraint to be used in that seating position. All of the child restraint types for which the ET7 is designed could be properly installed and accommodated.
- Bon
- Satisfaisant
- Moyen
- Faible
- Médiocre

Choc à la tête 16,4 Pts
Choc au bassin 2,2 Pts
Choc aux jambes 6,0 Pts
Nom du système | Autonomous Emergency Braking | |||
Type | Auto-Brake with Forward Collision Warning | |||
Opérationnel à compter de/du | 4 km/h | |||
Performances | | ||||
Fonction de freinage automatique |
-
Cycliste du côté passager, vue obstruée
-
Cycliste traversant la route
-
Cycliste le long de la route
Protection of the head of a struck pedestrian was predominantly good or adequate. The bumper offered good protection to pedestrians’ legs at all test locations but protection of the pelvis was predominantly weak or poor. The autonomous emergency braking (AEB) system of the ET7 can respond to vulnerable road users as well as to other vehicles. The system performed well in tests of its response to pedestrians and cyclists, with collisions avoided in most test scenarios.
- Bon
- Satisfaisant
- Moyen
- Faible
- Médiocre
Nom du système | Speed Assistance System |
Fonction d'information de limitation de vitesse | Camera & Map, subsigns supported |
Fonction de contrôle de vitesse | System advised (accurate to 5km/h) |
S'applique à | Front and rear seats | ||
Alerte | Siège conducteur | passager(s) avant | passager(s) arrière |
Visuelle | |||
Sonore | |||
Détection des occupants | |||
|
Nom du système | DMS |
Type | direct eye monitoring |
Opérationnel à compter de/du | 20 km/h |
Nom du système | Lane Support System |
Type | LKA and ELK |
Opérationnel à compter de/du | 65 km/h |
Performances | |
Système de maintien d’urgence dans la voie | |
Assistance au maintien sur la voie | |
Interface Homme-Machine |
Nom du système | Autonomous Emergency Braking | |||
Type | Autonomous emergency braking and forward collision warning | |||
Opérationnel à compter de/du | 4 km/h | |||
Capteur utilisé | camera and radar |
The ET7’s autonomous emergency braking (AEB) system performed well in tests of its reaction to other vehicles. A seatbelt reminder system is fitted as standard to the front and rear seats and the car is equipped with a system to detect driver fatigue. The lane support system gently corrects the vehicle’s path if it is drifting out of lane, and also intervenes in some more critical situations. A speed assistance system detects the local speed limit and the driver can choose to set the limiter or let the system do so automatically. [However, the speed limiter failed Euro NCAP’s accuracy requirements at one of the test speeds and that part of the system was not rewarded. NIO have informed Euro NCAP that all cars will receive revised software to improve the accuracy of the system.
- Caractéristiques
- Équipement de sécurité
- Vidéos
- Validité de la notation
Caractéristiques
Modèle testé NIO ET7, LHD
Type de carrosserie - 4 door saloon
Année de production 2022
Poids en ordre de marche 2379kg
NIV à partir duquel la notation s'applique - all ET7's
Catégorie De prestige
Équipement de sécurité
Remarque : d'autres équipements peuvent être disponibles sur le véhicule mais n'ont pas été pris en compte dans l'année de test.
Monté sur le véhicule de série
Monté sur la voiture en tant qu'élément du pack sécurité
Pas monté sur le véhicule test mais disponible en tant qu'option ou élément du pack sécurité
Non disponible
Non applicable
Vidéos
Validité de la notation
Variantes de la gamme de modèles
Body Type | Engine | Drivetrain | Rating Applies | |
---|---|---|---|---|
LHD | RHD | |||
4 door saloon | PEV * | 4 x 4 | ![]() |
- |
* Tested variant


Pour plus d’informations, veuillez consulter la section Commentaires généraux de l’évaluation

The passenger compartment of the ET7 remained stable in the frontal offset test. Dummy readings indicated good protection of the knees and femurs of both the driver and passenger. NIO demonstrated that a similar level of protection would be provided to occupants of different sizes and to those sitting in different positions. Protection was good for all critical body areas of the passenger. Analysis of the deceleration of the impact trolley during the test, and analysis of the deformable barrier after the test, revealed that the ET7 would be an aggressive impact partner in a frontal collision, and the score was penalised accordingly. In the full-width rigid barrier test, protection of all critical body areas was good and the ET7 scored maximum points in this part of the assessment. In the more aggressive side pole impact, protection of the driver’s chest was rated as marginal, based on dummy readings of rib compressions. Control of excursion (the extent to which a body is thrown to the other side of the vehicle when it is hit from the far side) was found to be adequate. The ET7 has a counter-measure to mitigate against occupant to occupant injuries in such impacts. The system performed well in Euro NCAP’s test, with good protection of occupants’ heads. Tests on the front seats and head restraints demonstrated good protection against whiplash injuries in the event of a rear-end collision. A geometric analysis of the rear seats also indicated good whiplash protection. The ET7 has an advanced eCall system which alerts the emergency services in the event of a crash and a system which automatically applies the brakes to prevent secondary collisions.