- With standard equipment
- With safety pack
Pour plus d’informations, veuillez consulter la section Commentaires généraux de l’évaluation
Vous trouverez plus d’informations dans l’onglet Validité de la notation
- Plus d'info
- Plus d'info
- Plus d'info
- Plus d'info
- Bon
- Satisfaisant
- Moyen
- Faible
- Médiocre


- Bon
- Satisfaisant
- Moyen
- Faible
- Médiocre


Passager
latéral
Centre
Monté sur le véhicule de série
Véhicule testé non équipé mais disponible en option
Non disponible
-
i-Size
-
ISOFIX
-
Système de retenue pour enfant à dispositif universel d'ancrage
Installation sans problème
installation avec précaution
problème critique de sécurité
installation non autorisée
Position de siège | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Avant | 2e rangée | |||
Passager | Gauche | Centre | Droite | |
Maxi Cosi 2way Pearl & 2wayFix (i-Size) | ||||
Maxi Cosi 2way Pearl & 2wayFix (i-Size) | ||||
BeSafe iZi Kid X2 i-Size (i-Size) | ||||
Britax Römer TriFix2 i-Size (i-Size) | ||||
BeSafe iZi Flex FIX i-Size (i-Size) | ||||
BeSafe iZi Combi X4 ISOfix (ISOFIX) | ||||
Cybex Solution Z i-Fix (ISOFIX) | ||||
Maxi Cosi Cabriofix (Belt) | ||||
Maxi Cosi Cabriofix & EasyFix (Belt) | ||||
Britax Römer King II LS (Belt) | ||||
Cybex Solution Z i-Fix (Belt) |
Installation sans problème
installation avec précaution
problème critique de sécurité
installation non autorisée
Dummy readings indicated good protection of both the 6 and 10 year dummies in both the frontal offset and the side barrier tests. However, the 6 year dummy was not fully restrained in the side impact, and the Limo lost points in this part of the assessment. The front passenger airbag can be disabled to allow a rearward-facing child restraint to be used in that seating position. However, the labelling of the switch does not meet Euro NCAP’s requirements for permanency. All of the restraint types for which the Limo is designed could be properly installed and accommodated.
- Bon
- Satisfaisant
- Moyen
- Faible
- Médiocre

Choc à la tête 13,1 Pts
Choc au bassin 5,8 Pts
Choc aux jambes 6,0 Pts
Nom du système | Active Emergency Braking System | |||
Type | Auto-Brake with Forward Collision Warning | |||
Opérationnel à compter de/du | 8 km/h | |||
Performances | | ||||
Fonction de freinage automatique |
-
Cycliste du côté passager, vue obstruée
-
Cycliste traversant la route
-
Cycliste le long de la route
The bonnet provided predominantly good or adequate protection to the head of a struck pedestrian, with poor results recorded at the base of the windscreen and on the stiff windscreen pillars. The bumper offered good protection to pedestrians’ legs and protection of the pelvis region was also good or adequate at all test locations. The autonomous emergency braking (AEB) system of the Limo can respond to vulnerable road users, as well as to other vehicles. The system performed adequately in tests of its response to pedestrians and cyclists, with collisions avoided in most scenarios.
- Bon
- Satisfaisant
- Moyen
- Faible
- Médiocre
Nom du système | Traffic Sign Recognition |
Fonction d'information de limitation de vitesse | Camera based, subsigns supported |
Fonction de contrôle de vitesse | System advised (accurate to 5km/h) |
S'applique à | Front and rear seats | ||
Alerte | Siège conducteur | passager(s) avant | passager(s) arrière |
Visuelle | |||
Sonore | |||
Détection des occupants | |||
|
Nom du système | Lane Keep Assist |
Type | LKA and ELK |
Opérationnel à compter de/du | 60 km/h |
Performances | |
Système de maintien d’urgence dans la voie | |
Assistance au maintien sur la voie | |
Interface Homme-Machine |
Nom du système | Active Emergency Braking System | |||
Type | Autonomous emergency braking and forward collision warning | |||
Opérationnel à compter de/du | 8 km/h | |||
Capteur utilisé | camera and radar |
The Limo’s autonomous emergency braking (AEB) system performed well in tests of its reaction to other vehicles. A seatbelt reminder system is fitted as standard to the front and rear seats but the car does not have a system to detect driver fatigue. The lane support system gently corrects the vehicle’s path if it is drifting out of lane, and also intervenes in some more critical situations. A speed assistance system detects the local speed limit, allowing the limiter to be set appropriately.
- Caractéristiques
- Équipement de sécurité
- Vidéos
- Validité de la notation
Caractéristiques
Modèle testé Mobilize Limo 'Techo', LHD
Type de carrosserie - 5 door hatchback
Année de production 2022
Poids en ordre de marche 1600kg
NIV à partir duquel la notation s'applique - all Limos
Catégorie Petite familiale
Équipement de sécurité
Remarque : d'autres équipements peuvent être disponibles sur le véhicule mais n'ont pas été pris en compte dans l'année de test.
Monté sur le véhicule de série
Monté sur la voiture en tant qu'élément du pack sécurité
Pas monté sur le véhicule test mais disponible en tant qu'option ou élément du pack sécurité
Non disponible
Non applicable
Vidéos
Validité de la notation


Pour plus d’informations, veuillez consulter la section Commentaires généraux de l’évaluation
The EVeasy Limo, unavailable in Europe but sold in Turkey, is identical to the Mobilize Limo tested by Euro NCAP and has the same level of safety equipment. Accordingly, the same level of safety would be expected from the EVeasy Limo.

The passenger compartment of the Limo remained stable in the frontal offset test. Inspection of the vehicle after the test revealed a rupture of the driver’s footwell. A penalty was applied to the score and Mobilize were precluded from demonstrating good knee and femur protection to occupants of sizes other than the dummies used, leading to a marginal rating for that body region. Protection of the driver’s chest was rated as marginal, based on dummy readings of compression. Analysis of the deceleration of the impact trolley during the test, and analysis of the deformable barrier after the test, revealed that the Limo would be a somewhat aggressive impact partner in a frontal collision. In the full-width rigid barrier test, protection of all critical body areas was good or adequate, apart from the driver’s chest, protection of which was rated as marginal based on compression. In the side barrier test, protection of all critical body areas was good but the test score was penalised as the door lock on the rear, impacted side was found to have released. In the more severe side pole impact, chest protection was rated as weak, based on rib compressions, but that of other critical body regions was good. Control of excursion (the extent to which a body is thrown to the other side of the vehicle when it is hit from the far side) was found to be adequate. The Limo has a counter-measure to mitigate against occupant to occupant injuries in such impacts. The system performed well in Euro NCAP’s test, with good protection of occupants’ heads. However, Mobilize could not demonstrate robust, symmetrical performance of the centre airbag and the score was penalised. Tests on the front seats and head restraints demonstrated good protection against whiplash injuries in the event of a rear-end collision. A geometric analysis of the rear seats also indicated good whiplash protection. The Limo has an advanced eCall system which alerts the emergency services in the event of a crash. The car also has a system which applies the brakes after an impact to avoid secondary collisions.