Pour plus d’informations, veuillez consulter la section Commentaires généraux de l’évaluation
Vous trouverez plus d’informations dans l’onglet Validité de la notation
-
Plus d'info
![]()
96% -
Plus d'info
![]()
75% -
Plus d'info
![]()
60% -
Plus d'info
![]()
86%
- Bon
- Satisfaisant
- Moyen
- Faible
- Médiocre
Passager
Conducteur
Siège avant
Voiture
Poteau
- Bon
- Satisfaisant
- Moyen
- Faible
- Médiocre
Passager
latéral
Centre
![]()
Monté sur le véhicule de série![]()
Véhicule testé non équipé mais disponible en option![]()
Non disponible
Véhicule testé non équipé mais disponible en optionForward movement of the 3 year dummy, sat in a forward-facing restraint, was not excessive. In the side impact, both child dummies were properly contained within the protective shells of their restraints, minimising the risk of dangerous head contact. The front passenger airbag can be disabled only by child restraints equipped with Mercedes Benz's automtic sensor system, known as CPOD. As there is no way of disabling the airbag for other rearward-facing restraints, the system was not rewarded by Euro NCAP. Permanently attached labels provided clear warnings of the dangers of using that seating position without first disabling the airbag.
- Bon
- Satisfaisant
- Moyen
- Faible
- Médiocre
Choc à la tête 17,4 Pts
Choc au bassin 0,0 Pts
Choc aux jambes 4,0 Pts
The M Class has an 'active' bonnet. Sensors in the bumper detect when a pedestrian has been struck and actuators lift the rear of the bonnet to provide greater clearance to hard structures underneath. Mercedes demonstrated that the system would deploy correctly for a wide range of pedestrian statures, and over a broad speed range. In all areas likely to be struck by the head of an adult, the bonnet provided good protection. In the areas likely to be struck by a child's head, protection was mixed, with areas of good, marginal and poor performance. The protection offered by the front edge of the bonnet to pedestrians was poor.
- Bon
- Satisfaisant
- Moyen
- Faible
- Médiocre
| Performances | ||
| Taux d'embardée du véhicule à COS + 1.00 s | 0% | Répond aux exigences de la CEE |
| Taux d'embardée du véhicule à COS + 1.75 s | 0% | Répond aux exigences de la CEE |
| Déplacement latéral à BOS + 1.07 s | 2.9 m | Répond aux exigences de la CEE |
| S'applique à | All seats | ||
| Alerte | Siège conducteur | passager(s) avant | passager(s) arrière |
| Visuelle | |
|
|
| Sonore | |
|
|
|
|||
ÉchoueThe M Class has electronic stability control as standard, as well a seatbelt reminder system for the driver, passenger and rear seats. A driver-set speed limitation device is standard equipment but did not meet Euro NCAP's requirements.
- Caractéristiques
- Équipement de sécurité
- Vidéos
- Advanced Rewards
- Validité de la notation
Caractéristiques
Modèle testé Mercedes-Benz ML 350 BlueTEC 4MATIC, LHD
Type de carrosserie - 5 door SUV
Année de production 2012
Poids en ordre de marche 2100kg
NIV à partir duquel la notation s'applique - all M-Class of the specification tested
Catégorie Grand SUV
Équipement de sécurité
Remarque : d'autres équipements peuvent être disponibles sur le véhicule mais n'ont pas été pris en compte dans l'année de test.
![]()
Monté sur le véhicule de série![]()
Monté sur le véhicule en option![]()
Véhicule testé non équipé mais disponible en option![]()
Non disponible![]()
Non applicable
Monté sur le véhicule en optionVidéos
Advanced Rewards
Validité de la notation
Pour plus d’informations, veuillez consulter la section Commentaires généraux de l’évaluation
The rating of the Mercedes-Benz M-Class has been upgraded from 2011 to 2012. The car is unchanged and test results have been carried over from the previous year. The 2012 rating reflects the performance of the M-Class against Euro NCAP's latest requirements.
Partager
The passenger compartment remained stable in the frontal impact. Dummy readings indicated good protection for the knees and femurs of both driver and front passenger. Mercedes Benz showed that a similar level of protection would be provided to occupants of different sizes and those sat in different positions. The M Class scored maximum points in the side barrier test. In the more severe side pole impact, protection of the chest was adequate and that of all other body areas was good. The front seats and head restraints provided good protection against whiplash injuries in the event of a rear impact.