-
Plus d'info
![]()
79% -
Plus d'info
![]()
81% -
Plus d'info
![]()
56% -
Plus d'info
![]()
70%
- Bon
- Satisfaisant
- Moyen
- Faible
- Médiocre
Passager
Conducteur
Siège avant
Voiture
Poteau
- Bon
- Satisfaisant
- Moyen
- Faible
- Médiocre
Passager
latéral
Centre
![]()
Monté sur le véhicule de série![]()
Véhicule testé non équipé mais disponible en option![]()
Non disponible
Véhicule testé non équipé mais disponible en option-
bébés jusqu'à 13 kg
-
bébés et jeunes enfants jusqu'à 18 kg
-
Jeunes enfants de 9 à 18 kg
-
Petits enfants de plus de 18 kg
![]()
Installation sans problème![]()
installation avec précaution![]()
problème critique de sécurité![]()
installation non autorisée
installation avec précaution
problème critique de sécurité| Position de siège | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Avant | 2e rangée | |||
| Passager | Gauche | Centre | Droite | |
| Maxi Cosi Cabriofix (Belt) | |
|
|
|
| Römer King Plus (Belt) | |
|
|
|
| Römer Duo Plus (ISOFIX) | |
|
|
|
| Römer KidFix (Belt) | |
|
|
|
| Maxi Cosi Cabriofix & EasyFix (Belt) | |
|
|
|
| Maxi Cosi Cabriofix & EasyFix (ISOFIX) | |
|
|
|
| BeSafe iZi Kid X3 ISOfix (ISOFIX) | |
|
|
|
| Maxi Cosi Pearl & Familyfix (ISOFIX) | |
|
|
|
| Römer KidFix (ISOFIX) | |
|
|
|
![]()
Installation sans problème![]()
installation avec précaution![]()
problème critique de sécurité![]()
installation non autorisée
Based on dummy readings in the dynamic tests, the Citan scored maximum points for its protection of both the 3 year and the 1½ year dummy. In the frontal test, forward movement of the 3 year old dummy, sat in a forward facing restraint, was not excessive and, in the side impact, both dummies were properly contained within the protective shells of their restraints, minimising the likelihood of head contact with parts of the car interior. The passenger airbag cannot be disabled, so a rearward-facing child restraint cannot be used in that seating position. Improvements made by Mercedes-Benz mean that all child restraints for which the car is designed can now be properly installed and accommodated.
- Bon
- Satisfaisant
- Moyen
- Faible
- Médiocre
Choc à la tête 14 Pts
Choc au bassin 0.5 Pts
Choc aux jambes 5.9 Pts
Pedestrian test results were carried over from the original assessment. The bumper was predominantly good but the front edge of the bonnet provided poor protection in most of the areas tested. Adequate protection was provided by the bonnet over much of its surface but protection in those areas where an adult's head might strike was mostly poor.
- Bon
- Satisfaisant
- Moyen
- Faible
- Médiocre
| Fonction de limitation de vitesse | Manually Set |
| Nom du système | ESP 9i | |
| Performances | ||
| Taux d'embardée du véhicule à COS + 1.00 s | 0% | Répond aux exigences de la CEE |
| Taux d'embardée du véhicule à COS + 1.75 s | 0% | Répond aux exigences de la CEE |
| Déplacement latéral à BOS + 1.07 s | 2.66 m | Répond aux exigences de la CEE |
--safetyAssistCommentEN--
- Caractéristiques
- Équipement de sécurité
- Vidéos
- Évaluations annuelles et nouvelles versions
Caractéristiques
Modèle testé Mercedes-Benz CITAN Kombi, 109 Blue Efficiency 'High' grade
Type de carrosserie - Small MPV
Année de production 2013
Poids en ordre de marche 1460kg
NIV à partir duquel la notation s'applique - WDF4157031U129453
Catégorie Petit monospace
Équipement de sécurité
Remarque : d'autres équipements peuvent être disponibles sur le véhicule mais n'ont pas été pris en compte dans l'année de test.
![]()
Monté sur le véhicule de série![]()
Monté sur le véhicule en option![]()
Véhicule testé non équipé mais disponible en option![]()
Non disponible![]()
Non applicable
Vidéos
Évaluations annuelles et nouvelles versions
The Mercedes-Benz CITAN Kombi was first tested by Euro NCAP in April 2013, and was given a three star rating. Mercedes-Benz indicated at that time that they would improve the safety performance of the vehicle, especially the deployment of the side airbag and the installation of child restraints; and that they would provide a seatbelt reminder for the front passenger seat and make the speed limitation device comply with Euro NCAP's requirements. These changes are now in production and Euro NCAP has re-assessed the vehicle. Several tests have been re-done to assess the changes that Mercedes-Benz have made. Where the performance is not influenced by the changes, test results have been carried over from the original assessment.
Partager
The passenger compartment remained stable in the frontal impact. Dummy readings indicated good protection of the knees and femurs of the driver and passenger dummies. Inspection of the vehicle showed that some structures in the dashboard presented a hazard to the knees and femurs of occupants of different sizes and to those sat in different positions. Dummy readings of chest compression indicated marginal protection of the driver's chest. The improvements made by Mercedes-Benz to the side airbag deployment proved successful and the Citan scored maximum points in the side barrier test with good protection of all body regions. In the side pole impact, the airbag deployed correctly but protection of the chest was rated as marginal. There was a gap between the B-pillar and the front edge of the sliding door. Although this gap was smaller than in the original Citan test, a penalty was again applied to the score. The front seats and head restraints provided marginal protection against whiplash injury in the event of a rear-end collision.