- With standard equipment
- With safety pack
Pour plus d’informations, veuillez consulter la section Commentaires généraux de l’évaluation
Vous trouverez plus d’informations dans l’onglet Validité de la notation
- Plus d'info
- Plus d'info
- Plus d'info
- Plus d'info
- Bon
- Satisfaisant
- Moyen
- Faible
- Médiocre








-
A l’approche d’une voiture à l'arrêt: Décalage à gauche
-
A l’approche d’une voiture à l'arrêt: Pas de décalage
-
A l’approche d’une voiture à l'arrêt: Décalage à droite
- Bon
- Satisfaisant
- Moyen
- Faible
- Médiocre


Passager
latéral
Centre
Monté sur le véhicule de série
Véhicule testé non équipé mais disponible en option
Non disponible
-
i-Size
-
ISOFIX
-
Système de retenue pour enfant à dispositif universel d'ancrage
Installation sans problème
installation avec précaution
problème critique de sécurité
installation non autorisée
Position de siège | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Avant | 2e rangée | |||
Passager | Gauche | Centre | Droite | |
Maxi Cosi 2way Pearl & 2wayFix (rearward) (iSize) | ||||
Maxi Cosi 2way Pearl & 2wayFix (forward) (iSize) | ||||
BeSafe iZi Kid X2 i-Size (iSize) | ||||
BeSafe iZi Flex FIX i-Size (iSize) | ||||
Maxi Cosi Cabriofix & FamilyFix (ISOFIX) | ||||
BeSafe iZi Kid X4 ISOfix (ISOFIX) | ||||
Britax Römer Duo Plus (ISOFIX) | ||||
Britax Römer KidFix XP (ISOFIX) | ||||
Maxi Cosi Cabriofix (Belt) | ||||
Maxi Cosi Cabriofix & EasyBase2 (Belt) | ||||
Britax Römer King II LS (Belt) | ||||
Britax Römer KidFix XP (Belt) |
Installation sans problème
installation avec précaution
problème critique de sécurité
installation non autorisée
In the frontal offset test, protection of the 6 and 10 year dummies was good apart from the neck, protection of which was adequate. In the side barrier test, full points were scored with good protection of all critical parts of the body. The front passenger airbag can be disabled to allow a rearward-facing child restraint to be used in that seating position. Clear information is provided to the driver regarding the status of the airbag and the system was rewarded. All of the restraint types for which the UX is designed could be properly installed and accommodated.
- Bon
- Satisfaisant
- Moyen
- Faible
- Médiocre

Choc à la tête 17,1 Pts
Choc au bassin 5,0 Pts
Choc aux jambes 6,0 Pts
Nom du système | Pre Crash System as part of Lexus Safety System + | |||
Type | Auto-Brake with Forward Collision Warning | |||
Opérationnel à compter de/du | 10 km/h | |||
Performances | | ||||
Fonction de freinage automatique |
-
Cycliste traversant la route
-
Cycliste le long de la route
The protection provided by the bonnet to the head of a struck pedestrian was predominantly good or adequate. The bumper provided good protection to pedestrians' legs at all test locations, and scored maximum points. Protection of the pelvis was more mixed but was largely good or adequate. The AEB system of the UX can detect vulnerable road users, as well as other vehicles. The system scored maximum points in tests of its performance in reacting to pedestrians with collisions avoided in all scenarios, and it performed well in tests of its cyclist detection.
- Bon
- Satisfaisant
- Moyen
- Faible
- Médiocre
Nom du système | Dynamic Radar Cruise Control with Road Sign Assist as part of Lexus Safety System+ |
Fonction d'information de limitation de vitesse | Camera based |
Fonction de contrôle de vitesse | System advised (accurate to 5km/h) |
S'applique à | Not available | ||
Alerte | Siège conducteur | passager(s) avant | passager(s) arrière |
Visuelle | |||
Sonore | |||
Détection des occupants | |||
|
Nom du système | Lane Departure Alert with steering control as part of Lexus Safety System + |
Type | LKA (including LDW) |
Opérationnel à compter de/du | 50 km/h |
Performances | |
Assistance au maintien sur la voie | |
Interface Homme-Machine |
Nom du système | Pre-crash System as part of Lexus Safety System + | |||
Type | Autonomous Emergency Braking and Forward Collision Warning | |||
Opérationnel à compter de/du | 10 km/h |
The AEB system performed well in tests of its reaction to other vehicles at highway speeds. The lane support system helps to prevent inadvertent drifting out of lane but does not intervene in more critical situations, as do the systems of some other vehicles. The speed assistance system uses a camera to determine the local speed limit. The limit is presented to the driver and offers the opportunity to set the limiter to the speed shown. There is a seatbelt reminder for the front and rear seats.
- Caractéristiques
- Équipement de sécurité
- Vidéos
- Validité de la notation
Caractéristiques
Modèle testé Lexus UX 250h, LHD
Type de carrosserie - 5 door SUV
Année de production 2019
Poids en ordre de marche 1580kg
NIV à partir duquel la notation s'applique - all UX
Catégorie Small Off-Road 4x4
Équipement de sécurité
Remarque : d'autres équipements peuvent être disponibles sur le véhicule mais n'ont pas été pris en compte dans l'année de test.
Monté sur le véhicule de série
Monté sur la voiture en tant qu'élément du pack sécurité
Pas monté sur le véhicule test mais disponible en tant qu'option ou élément du pack sécurité
Non disponible
Non applicable
Vidéos
Validité de la notation
Variantes de la gamme de modèles
Body Type | Engine & Transmission | Model Name/Code | Drivetrain | Rating Applies | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
LHD | RHD | ||||
5 door SUV | 2.0 Hybrid | UX 250h* | 4 x 2 | ![]() |
![]() |
5 door SUV | 2.0 Hybrid | UX 250h e-Four | 4 x 4 | ![]() |
![]() |
5 door SUV | 2.0 Petrol | UX 200 | 4 x 2 | ![]() |
![]() |
5 door SUV | Electric Motor | UX 300e | 4 x 2 | ![]() |
![]() |
* Tested variant




Pour plus d’informations, veuillez consulter la section Commentaires généraux de l’évaluation

The passenger compartment of the UX remained stable in the frontal offset test. Dummy readings indicated good protection of the knees and femurs for both the driver and passenger. Lexus showed that a similar level of protection would be provided to occupants of different sizes and to those sitting in different positions. In the full-width rigid barrier test, protection was good or adequate for both the driver and rear seat passenger. In both the side barrier and the more severe side pole tests, maximum points were scored, with good protection of all critical body regions. Tests on the front seats and head restraints demonstrated good protection against whiplash injuries in the event of a rear-end collision. A geometric assessment of the rear seats also indicated good whiplash protection. The standard-fit autonomous emergency braking system scored full points in tests of its functionality at the low speeds at which many whiplash injuries occur, with collisions avoided at all test speeds and overlaps.