Pour plus d’informations, veuillez consulter la section Commentaires généraux de l’évaluation
Vous trouverez plus d’informations dans l’onglet Validité de la notation
- Plus d'info
- Plus d'info
- Plus d'info
- Plus d'info
- Bon
- Satisfaisant
- Moyen
- Faible
- Médiocre






- Bon
- Satisfaisant
- Moyen
- Faible
- Médiocre


Passager
latéral
Centre
Monté sur le véhicule de série
Véhicule testé non équipé mais disponible en option
Non disponible
-
bébés jusqu'à 13 kg
-
bébés et jeunes enfants jusqu'à 18 kg
-
Jeunes enfants de 9 à 18 kg
-
Petits enfants de plus de 18 kg
Installation sans problème
installation avec précaution
problème critique de sécurité
installation non autorisée
Position de siège | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Avant | 2e rangée | |||
Passager | Gauche | Centre | Droite | |
Maxi Cosi Cabriofix (Belt) | ||||
Britax Römer King Plus (Belt) | ||||
Britax Römer Duo Plus (ISOFIX) | ||||
Britax Römer KidFix (Belt) | ||||
Maxi Cosi Cabriofix & EasyFix (Belt) | ||||
Maxi Cosi Cabriofix & EasyFix (ISOFIX) | ||||
BeSafe iZi Kid X3 ISOfix (ISOFIX) | ||||
Maxi Cosi Pearl & Familyfix (ISOFIX) | ||||
Britax Römer KidFix (ISOFIX) |
Installation sans problème
installation avec précaution
problème critique de sécurité
installation non autorisée
The Soul EV scored maximum points for its protection of the 1½ year dummy in the frontal and side barrier crash tests. In the frontal impact, forward movement of the head of the 3 year dummy, sat in a forward-facing restraint, was not excessive although neck loads were marginally high. In the side impact, both dummies were properly contained within the protective shells of their restraints, minimising the likelihood of head contact with the vehicle interior. The front passenger airbag can be disabled to allow a rearward-facing restraint to be used in that seating position. Clear information is provided to the driver regarding the status of the airbag and the system was rewarded. All of the restraint types for which the car is designed could be properly installed and accommodated in the Soul EV.
- Bon
- Satisfaisant
- Moyen
- Faible
- Médiocre

Choc à la tête 15,3 Pts
Choc au bassin 0,0 Pts
Choc aux jambes 6,0 Pts
The protection provided by the bumper to pedestrians' legs was good at almost every test location. However, the protection provided to the pelvis by the front edge of the bonnet was poor and the Soul scored no points in this area. The protection provided by the bonnet to a pedestrian's head was predominantly good or adequate with poor results recorded only on the stiff windscreen pillars.
- Bon
- Satisfaisant
- Moyen
- Faible
- Médiocre
Fonction de limitation de vitesse | Manually Set |
Nom du système | ESC | |
Performances |
S'applique à | Front seats | ||
Alerte | Siège conducteur | passager(s) avant | passager(s) arrière |
Visuelle | |||
Sonore | |||
|
Electronic stability control is standard on the Soul EV, together with a seatbelt reminder system for the front and rear seating positions. A driver-set speed limitation device is an option which is expected to be fitted to most cars sold so it was included in the assessment and met Euro NCAP's requirements for systems of that type. Neither a lane assist system nor autonomous emergency braking are available on the Soul.
- Caractéristiques
- Équipement de sécurité
- Vidéos
- Validité de la notation
Caractéristiques
Modèle testé Soul EV 81.4kW EV 'SX', LHD
Type de carrosserie - 5 door wagon
Année de production 2014
Poids en ordre de marche 1513kg
NIV à partir duquel la notation s'applique - applies to all Soul EV's of the specification tested
Catégorie Petit monospace
Équipement de sécurité
Remarque : d'autres équipements peuvent être disponibles sur le véhicule mais n'ont pas été pris en compte dans l'année de test.
Monté sur le véhicule de série
Monté sur le véhicule en option
Véhicule testé non équipé mais disponible en option
Non disponible
Non applicable
Vidéos
Validité de la notation














Pour plus d’informations, veuillez consulter la section Commentaires généraux de l’évaluation

The passenger compartment remained stable in the frontal impact. Dummy readings indicated good protection of the knees and femurs of the driver and passenger. Kia showed that a similar level of protection would be provided to occupants of different statures and to those sat in different positions, whose knees might contact the dashboard in different places. In the side barrier test, the Soul EV scored maximum points, with good protection of all critical body areas. However, in the more severe side pole test, dummy readings of rib compression indicated weak protection for the chest area. The front seats and head restraints demonstrated good protection against whiplash injury in the event of a rear-end collision while a geometric assessment of the rear restraints indicated marginal whiplash protection.