Pour plus d’informations, veuillez consulter la section Commentaires généraux de l’évaluation
Vous trouverez plus d’informations dans l’onglet Validité de la notation
- Plus d'info
- Plus d'info
- Plus d'info
- Plus d'info
- Bon
- Satisfaisant
- Moyen
- Faible
- Médiocre








- Bon
- Satisfaisant
- Moyen
- Faible
- Médiocre


Passager
latéral
Centre
Monté sur le véhicule de série
Véhicule testé non équipé mais disponible en option
Non disponible
-
i-Size
-
ISOFIX
-
Système de retenue pour enfant à dispositif universel d'ancrage
Installation sans problème
installation avec précaution
problème critique de sécurité
installation non autorisée
Position de siège | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Avant | 2e rangée | |||
Passager | Gauche | Centre | Droite | |
Maxi Cosi 2way Pearl & 2wayFix (rearward) (iSize) | ||||
Maxi Cosi 2way Pearl & 2wayFix (forward) (iSize) | ||||
BeSafe iZi Kid X2 i-Size (iSize) | ||||
Maxi Cosi Cabriofix & FamilyFix (ISOFIX) | ||||
BeSafe iZi Kid X4 ISOfix (ISOFIX) | ||||
Britax Römer Duo Plus (ISOFIX) | ||||
Britax Römer KidFix XP (ISOFIX) | ||||
Maxi Cosi Cabriofix (Belt) | ||||
Maxi Cosi Cabriofix & EasyBase2 (Belt) | ||||
Britax Römer King II LS (Belt) | ||||
Britax Römer KidFix XP (Belt) |
Installation sans problème
installation avec précaution
problème critique de sécurité
installation non autorisée
In the frontal offset test, protection of the chest of the 6 year dummy was rated as marginal, based on dummy readings of chest decelerations. Otherwise, protection of the 6 and 10 year dummies was good or adequate. In the side barrier test, protection of both dummies was good. The front passenger airbag can be disabled to allow a rearward-facing child restraint to be used in that seating position. Clear information is provided to the driver regarding the status of the airbag and the system was rewarded. All of the restraint types for which the Rio is designed could be properly installed and accommodated in the car with the exception of the Group II/III universal restraint which was unstable in the rear centre position.
- Bon
- Satisfaisant
- Moyen
- Faible
- Médiocre

Choc à la tête 14,0 Pts
Choc au bassin 6,0 Pts
Choc aux jambes 6,0 Pts
The bonnet provided predominantly good or adequate protection to the head of a struck pedestrian, with some poor results recorded on the stiff windscreen pillars. The bumper provided good protection to pedestrians' legs at all test locations and the pelvis was also well protected, the Rio scoring maximum points in these tests. The optional autonomous emergency braking system can detect pedestrians but the results are not included in this assessment of standard safety equipment.
- Bon
- Satisfaisant
- Moyen
- Faible
- Médiocre
S'applique à | All seats | ||
Alerte | Siège conducteur | passager(s) avant | passager(s) arrière |
Visuelle | |||
Sonore | |||
|
A seatbelt reminder system is standard equipment for the front and rear seats. Autonomous emergency braking and a lane assistance systems are part of the optional safety pack, the results of which are not included in this rating.
- Caractéristiques
- Équipement de sécurité
- Vidéos
- Validité de la notation
Caractéristiques
Modèle testé Kia Rio 1.2 GLS, LHD
Type de carrosserie - 5 door hatchback
Année de production 2017
Poids en ordre de marche 1040kg
NIV à partir duquel la notation s'applique - all Rios
Catégorie Petite familiale
Équipement de sécurité
Remarque : d'autres équipements peuvent être disponibles sur le véhicule mais n'ont pas été pris en compte dans l'année de test.
Monté sur le véhicule de série
Monté sur la voiture en tant qu'élément du pack sécurité
Pas monté sur le véhicule test mais disponible en tant qu'option ou élément du pack sécurité
Non disponible
Non applicable
Vidéos
Validité de la notation
Variantes de la gamme de modèles
Body Type | Engine | Drivetrain | Rating Applies | |
---|---|---|---|---|
LHD | RHD | |||
5 door hatchback | 1.2 petrol* | 4 x 2 | ![]() |
![]() |
5 door hatchback | 1.4 petrol | 4 x 2 | ![]() |
![]() |
5 door hatchback | 1.0 T-GDI | 4 x 2 | ![]() |
![]() |
5 door hatchback | 1.4 CRDi | 4 x 2 | ![]() |
![]() |
5 door hatchback | 1.0 petrol mild hybrid | 4 x 2 | ![]() |
![]() |
* Tested variant












Pour plus d’informations, veuillez consulter la section Commentaires généraux de l’évaluation

The passenger compartment remained stable in the frontal offset test. There was insufficient pressure in the driver's airbag to prevent the head from 'bottoming out' the airbag. Protection of the head was downgraded to adequate as a result. Dummy readings indicated good protection of the knees and femurs of both the driver and passenger. Kia showed that a similar level of protection would be provided to occupants of different sizes and to those sat in different positions. In the full-width rigid barrier test, protection of critical body areas was good or adequate for the driver and rear passenger. In the side barrier test and in the more severe side pole impact, protection of all critical parts of the body was good and the Rio scored maximum points in these tests. Tests on the front seats and head restraints demonstrated good protection against whiplash injuries in the event of a rear-end collision while a geometric assessment of the rear seats indicated marginal whiplash protection. The Rio has, as part of its optional safety pack, an autonomous emergency braking system but the results of those tests are not included in this rating.