- With standard equipment
- With safety pack
Pour plus d’informations, veuillez consulter la section Commentaires généraux de l’évaluation
Vous trouverez plus d’informations dans l’onglet Validité de la notation
- Plus d'info
- Plus d'info
- Plus d'info
- Plus d'info
- Bon
- Satisfaisant
- Moyen
- Faible
- Médiocre








- Bon
- Satisfaisant
- Moyen
- Faible
- Médiocre


Passager
latéral
Centre
Monté sur le véhicule de série
Véhicule testé non équipé mais disponible en option
Non disponible
-
i-Size
-
ISOFIX
-
Système de retenue pour enfant à dispositif universel d'ancrage
Installation sans problème
installation avec précaution
problème critique de sécurité
installation non autorisée
Position de siège | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Avant | 2e rangée | |||
Passager | Gauche | Centre | Droite | |
Maxi Cosi 2way Pearl & 2wayFix (rearward) (iSize) | ||||
Maxi Cosi 2way Pearl & 2wayFix (forward) (iSize) | ||||
BeSafe iZi Kid X2 i-Size (iSize) | ||||
Maxi Cosi Cabriofix & FamilyFix (ISOFIX) | ||||
BeSafe iZi Kid X4 ISOfix (ISOFIX) | ||||
Britax Römer Duo Plus (ISOFIX) | ||||
Britax Römer KidFix XP (ISOFIX) | ||||
Maxi Cosi Cabriofix (Belt) | ||||
Maxi Cosi Cabriofix & EasyBase2 (Belt) | ||||
Britax Römer King II LS (Belt) | ||||
Britax Römer KidFix XP (Belt) |
Installation sans problème
installation avec précaution
problème critique de sécurité
installation non autorisée
In the frontal offset test, protection of both dummies was good or adequate for all critical body areas. In the side barrier test, the head of the 10 year dummy 'bottomed out' the curtain airbag but dummy readings indicated adequate protection for this part of the body. Otherwise, protection of both child dummies was good. The front passenger airbag can be disabled to allow a rearward-facing child restraint to be used in that seating position. Clear information is provided to the driver regarding the status of the airbag and the system was rewarded. The rear centre seating position failed the installation test for two belted universal restraints, owing to interference between the restraint and the buckle. Otherwise, restraints could be properly installed and accommodated in the car.
- Bon
- Satisfaisant
- Moyen
- Faible
- Médiocre

Choc à la tête 14,5 Pts
Choc au bassin 5,9 Pts
Choc aux jambes 6,0 Pts
The protection provided by the bonnet to the head of a struck pedestrian was predominantly good or adequate but poor results were recorded along the base of the windscreen and on the stiff windscreen pillars. Protection of pedestrians' legs by the bumper was good at all test locations, and protection of the pelvis was good or adequate. The autonomous emergency braking system performed adequately in tests against a pedestrian target but the results are not included in this rating as the system is part of an optional safety pack.
- Bon
- Satisfaisant
- Moyen
- Faible
- Médiocre
Nom du système | MSLA (Manual Speed Limit Assist) |
Fonction d'information de limitation de vitesse | N/A |
Fonction d'alerte | Manually set |
Fonction de limitation de vitesse | Manually set (accurate to 5km/h) |
S'applique à | All seats | ||
Alerte | Siège conducteur | passager(s) avant | passager(s) arrière |
Visuelle | |||
Sonore | |||
|
Nom du système | LKA (Lane Keeping Assist) |
Type | Lane Keep Assist and Lane Departure Warning |
Opérationnel à compter de/du | 60 km/h |
Alerte | Audible |
Performances | |
Test de confirmation du système de maintien de voie (LKA)
|
Pass (5/5) |
Test de confirmation d'alerte de franchissement involontaire de ligne (LDW)
|
Pass |
A seatbelt reminder is standard for front and rear seats, together with a driver-set speed limiter. Lane support is provided by a system that warns the driver when the car is drifting out of lane and gently corrects the steering path. The autonomous emergency braking system performed well in tests of its functionality at highway speeds but the results are not included in this assessment as the system is part of an optional safety pack.
- Caractéristiques
- Équipement de sécurité
- Vidéos
- Validité de la notation
Caractéristiques
Modèle testé Hyundai KONA 1.0 T-GDI, LHD
Type de carrosserie - 5 door SUV
Année de production 2017
Poids en ordre de marche 1365kg
NIV à partir duquel la notation s'applique - all KONAs
Catégorie Petit SUV
Équipement de sécurité
Remarque : d'autres équipements peuvent être disponibles sur le véhicule mais n'ont pas été pris en compte dans l'année de test.
Monté sur le véhicule de série
Monté sur la voiture en tant qu'élément du pack sécurité
Pas monté sur le véhicule test mais disponible en tant qu'option ou élément du pack sécurité
Non disponible
Non applicable
Vidéos
Validité de la notation
Variantes de la gamme de modèles
Body Type | Engine & Transmission | Drivetrain | Rating Applies | |
---|---|---|---|---|
LHD | RHD | |||
5 door SUV | 1.0 T-GDI, MT* | 4 x 2 | ![]() |
![]() |
5 door SUV | 1.6 T-GDI, DCT | 4 x 4 | ![]() |
![]() |
5 door SUV | 1.6 CRDi, MT | 4 x 2 | ![]() |
![]() |
5 door SUV | 1.6 CRDi, DCT | 4 x 2 | ![]() |
![]() |
5 door SUV | 1.6 CRDi, DCT | 4 x 4 | ![]() |
![]() |
5 door SUV | 1.6 petrol hybrid | 4 x 2 | ![]() |
![]() |
5 door SUV | 1.0 petrol mild hybrid | 4 x 2 | ![]() |
![]() |
5 door SUV | 1.6 diesel mild hybrid | 4 x 2 | ![]() |
![]() |
* Tested variant








Pour plus d’informations, veuillez consulter la section Commentaires généraux de l’évaluation

The passenger compartment of the KONA remained stable in the frontal offset test. Dummy readings indicated good protection of the knees and femurs of the driver and passenger. Hyundai showed that a similar level of protection would be provided to occupants of different sizes and to those sat in different positions. Protection of the passenger dummy was good for all critical body areas in this test. In the full-width rigid barrier test, protection of the driver dummy was good for all critical parts of the body and that of the rear passenger was good apart from the chest, protection of which was adequate. In the side barrier test, the KONA scored maximum points, with good protection for all body areas. Even in the more severe side pole impact, protection of the chest was adequate and that of other parts of the body was good. In that test, the front windscreen became detached from the vehicle. The car used for the pole test had previously been used for the pedestrian headform tests and the screen detachment was a consequence of incorrect bonding of the replacement. This behaviour is not representative of production KONAs but has no influence on the dummy readings recorded in the test. Tests on the front seats and head restraints demonstrated good protection against whiplash injuries in the event of a rear-end collision. A geometric assessment of the rear seats indicated marginal whiplash protection. An autonomous emergency braking system is available as part of an optional safety pack. In tests, it showed good performance at the low speeds at which many whiplash injuries are caused but the results are not included in this assessment because the equipment is not standard.