Pour plus d’informations, veuillez consulter la section Commentaires généraux de l’évaluation
Vous trouverez plus d’informations dans l’onglet Validité de la notation
-
Plus d'info
![]()
89% -
Plus d'info
![]()
85% -
Plus d'info
![]()
64% -
Plus d'info
![]()
71%
- Bon
- Satisfaisant
- Moyen
- Faible
- Médiocre
Passager
Conducteur
Siège avant
Voiture
Poteau
- Bon
- Satisfaisant
- Moyen
- Faible
- Médiocre
Passager
latéral
Centre
![]()
Monté sur le véhicule de série![]()
Véhicule testé non équipé mais disponible en option![]()
Non disponible
Véhicule testé non équipé mais disponible en optionForward movement of the 3 year dummy, sat in a forward facing restraint, was not excessive and the rebound was well controlled. In the side barrier impact, both dummies were properly contained by their respective restraints. The passenger airbag can be disabled to allow a rearward facing child restraint to be used in that seating position. Clear information is provided to the driver regarding the status of the airbag and the system was rewarded by Euro NCAP. A permanent label warns clearly of the risks of using a rearward facing restraint in the front passenger seat without first disabling the airbag.
- Bon
- Satisfaisant
- Moyen
- Faible
- Médiocre
Choc à la tête 12,8 Pts
Choc au bassin 4,2 Pts
Choc aux jambes 6,0 Pts
The bumper scored maximum points for its protection of pedestrians' legs. The front edge of the bonnet provided marginal protection. In most areas likely to be struck by the head of a child, the bonnet offered good protection but was predominantly poor in the areas where an adult's head might strike.
- Bon
- Satisfaisant
- Moyen
- Faible
- Médiocre
| S'applique à | Front seats | ||
| Alerte | Siège conducteur | passager(s) avant | passager(s) arrière |
| Visuelle | |
|
 |
| Sonore | |
|
|
|
|||
ÉchoueAs Electronic Stability Control (ESC) it is to be fitted as standard in the great majority of sales, it has been included in Euro NCAP's assessment of the car. A seatbelt reminder system is standard equipment for the driver, front passenger and rear seats. As the rear seat system is not available on the Kia Venga which was assessed, the score has not been included in the rating of the ix20.
- Caractéristiques
- Équipement de sécurité
- Vidéos
- Validité de la notation
Caractéristiques
Modèle testé Tested Car: Kia Venga 1.4 GLS, LHD
Type de carrosserie - 5 door MPV
Année de production 2011
Poids en ordre de marche 1220kg
NIV à partir duquel la notation s'applique - applies to all ix20's of the specification tested
Catégorie Petit monospace
Équipement de sécurité
Remarque : d'autres équipements peuvent être disponibles sur le véhicule mais n'ont pas été pris en compte dans l'année de test.
![]()
Monté sur le véhicule de série![]()
Monté sur le véhicule en option![]()
Véhicule testé non équipé mais disponible en option![]()
Non disponible![]()
Non applicable
Vidéos
Validité de la notation
Pour plus d’informations, veuillez consulter la section Commentaires généraux de l’évaluation
Euro NCAP is informed that the Hyundai ix20 is structurally identical to the Kia Venga and has the same interior fittings and levels of safety equipment. Accordingly, Euro NCAP believes that the star rating of the Venga can also be applied to the Hyundai ix20.
Partager
In the frontal test, the passenger compartment remained stable. Protection of the driver's chest was rated as marginal. Dummy readings showed good protection of the knees and femurs of the front seat occupants. However, the steering column and ignition barrel presented a risk of injury to the driver's femurs. In the side barrier impact, the car scored maximum points. In the more severe side pole test, dummy readings indicated marginal protection of the chest and good protection of other parts of the body. Protection of the neck against whiplash injuries in a rear-end impact was good.