- With standard equipment
- With safety pack
Pour plus d’informations, veuillez consulter la section Commentaires généraux de l’évaluation
Vous trouverez plus d’informations dans l’onglet Validité de la notation
- Plus d'info
- Plus d'info
- Plus d'info
- Plus d'info
- Bon
- Satisfaisant
- Moyen
- Faible
- Médiocre


- Bon
- Satisfaisant
- Moyen
- Faible
- Médiocre


Passager
latéral
Centre
Monté sur le véhicule de série
Véhicule testé non équipé mais disponible en option
Non disponible
-
i-Size
-
ISOFIX
-
Système de retenue pour enfant à dispositif universel d'ancrage
Installation sans problème
installation avec précaution
problème critique de sécurité
installation non autorisée
Position de siège | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Avant | 2e rangée | |||
Passager | Gauche | Centre | Droite | |
Maxi Cosi 2way Pearl & 2wayFix (i-Size) | ||||
Maxi Cosi 2way Pearl & 2wayFix (i-Size) | ||||
BeSafe iZi Kid X2 i-Size (i-Size) | ||||
Britax Römer TriFix2 i-Size (i-Size) | ||||
BeSafe iZi Flex FIX i-Size (i-Size) | ||||
BeSafe iZi Combi X4 ISOfix (ISOFIX) | ||||
Britax Römer KidFix XP (ISOFIX) | ||||
Maxi Cosi Cabriofix (Belt) | ||||
Maxi Cosi Cabriofix & EasyBase2 (Belt) | ||||
Britax Römer King II LS (Belt) | ||||
Britax Römer KidFix XP (Belt) |
Installation sans problème
installation avec précaution
problème critique de sécurité
installation non autorisée
In the frontal offset test, protection of both child dummies was good or adequate for all critical parts of the body except the neck of the 10 year dummy, protection of which was rated as marginal, based on measurements of neck tension. In the side barrier test, protection of the chest of the 10-year dummy was poor and that of the head was marginal, based on high accelerations. The front passenger airbag can be disabled to allow a rearward-facing child restraint to be used in that seating position. Clear information is provided to the driver regarding the status of the airbag and the system was rewarded. With the exception of one universal child restraint in the rear centre seat, all of the restraints for which the i10 is designed could be properly installed and accommodated.
- Bon
- Satisfaisant
- Moyen
- Faible
- Médiocre

Choc à la tête 13,8 Pts
Choc au bassin 5,2 Pts
Choc aux jambes 6,0 Pts
Nom du système | Forward Collision Avoidance (FCA) | |||
Type | Auto-Brake with Forward Collision Warning | |||
Opérationnel à compter de/du | 8 km/h | |||
Performances | | ||||
Fonction de freinage automatique |
The bonnet surface provided predominantly adequate or marginal protection to the head of a struck pedestrian, with some poor results recorded on the stiff windscreen pillars but good results on the windscreen surface. The bumper provided good protection to pedestrians' legs but protection of the pelvis was mixed. The i10’s autonomous emergency braking (AEB) system can detect pedestrians but not cyclists, for which more sophisticated hardware is required. In tests, the system's response to pedestrians was marginal. The system does not detect pedestrians to the rear of the car, and reversing tests were not performed.
- Bon
- Satisfaisant
- Moyen
- Faible
- Médiocre
Nom du système | MSLA (Manual Speed Limit Assist) |
Fonction d'information de limitation de vitesse | N/A |
Fonction de contrôle de vitesse | Manually set (accurate to 5km/h) |
S'applique à | Front and rear seats | ||
Alerte | Siège conducteur | passager(s) avant | passager(s) arrière |
Visuelle | |||
Sonore | |||
Détection des occupants | |||
|
Nom du système | Driver Attention Warning |
Type | Steering input |
Opérationnel à compter de/du | 50 km/h |
Nom du système | Lane Keeping Assist (LKA) |
Type | LKA and ELK |
Opérationnel à compter de/du | 60 km/h |
Performances | |
Système de maintien d’urgence dans la voie | |
Assistance au maintien sur la voie | |
Interface Homme-Machine |
Nom du système | FCA | |||
Type | Autonomous emergency braking and forward collision warning | |||
Opérationnel à compter de/du | 8 km/h | |||
Capteur utilisé | camera |
Autonomous emergency braking (AEB) is fitted as standard. The system performed marginally in tests of its detection and reaction to other vehicles. As well as a seatbelt reminder for front and rear seats, the i10 has a driver monitoring system which uses steering inputs to identify whether the driver is alert and focussed on the driving task or is impaired through fatigue or other factors. The system warns the driver if impaired driving is detected. The lane support system gently corrects the steering of the car if it is drifting out of lane and also intervenes much more severely in some critical situations. A driver-set speed limiter is standard equipment.
- Caractéristiques
- Équipement de sécurité
- Vidéos
- Validité de la notation
Caractéristiques
Modèle testé Hyundai i10 1.0 MPI GLS, LHD
Type de carrosserie - 5 door hatchback
Année de production 2020
Poids en ordre de marche 993kg
NIV à partir duquel la notation s'applique - all i10s
Catégorie Citadine
Équipement de sécurité
Remarque : d'autres équipements peuvent être disponibles sur le véhicule mais n'ont pas été pris en compte dans l'année de test.
Monté sur le véhicule de série
Monté sur la voiture en tant qu'élément du pack sécurité
Pas monté sur le véhicule test mais disponible en tant qu'option ou élément du pack sécurité
Non disponible
Non applicable
Vidéos
Validité de la notation
Variantes de la gamme de modèles
Body Type | Engine | Drivetrain | Rating Applies | |
---|---|---|---|---|
LHD | RHD | |||
5 door hatchback | 1.0 petrol* | 4 x 2 | ![]() |
![]() |
5 door hatchback | 1.2 petrol | 4 x 2 | ![]() |
![]() |
* Tested variant


Pour plus d’informations, veuillez consulter la section Commentaires généraux de l’évaluation

The passenger compartment remained stable in the offset frontal test. Protection of the driver's chest was rated as weak, based on dummy measurements of compression. Dummy readings of the knees and femurs were good but some structures in the dashboard were thought to pose a risk of injury so the score was penalised. The i10's low weight and benign front structure did not pose a high risk to the occupants of a colliding vehicle in a frontal offset impact. In the full-width, rigid wall test, protection was good or adequate for all body critical body regions except for the driver's abdomen. The abdomen slid under the lap section of the seatbelt (a phenomenon known as 'submarining') and protection of that body region was rated as poor. In the side barrier test, representing a collision by another vehicle, protection of all critical body areas was good. Similarly, in the more severe side pole impact, protection was good all-round. In an assessment of protection in far-side impact, dummy excursion (its movement towards the other side of the vehicle) was rated as poor. The i10 is not equipped with centre airbags to protect against occupant-to-occupant interaction in side impacts. Tests on the front seats and head restraints demonstrated good protection against whiplash injury in the event of a rear-end collision. A geometric assessment of the rear seats indicated marginal whiplash protection. The i10 is equipped with an advanced e-Call system which, in the event of an accident, automatically sends a message to the emergency services, giving the car's location.