Find more information in the General Comments section of the assessment
Find more information in the Rating Validity tab of the assessment
- See More
- See More
- See More
- See More
- Good
- Adequate
- Marginal
- Weak
- Poor
 Passenger
                Passenger
             Driver
                Driver
             Front Seat
                Front Seat
             Car
                Car
             Pole
                Pole
            - Good
- Adequate
- Marginal
- Weak
- Poor
 
                     
                    Passenger
outboard
center
- Fitted to the vehicle as standard 
- Not fitted to the test vehicle but available as option 
- Not Available 
Based on dummy readings in the dynamic crash tests, the H-1 scored maximum points for its protection of the 3 year infant. In the frontal test, forward movement of that dummy, sat in a forward-facing restraint, was not excessive. In the side impact, both dummies were properly contained by their restraints, minimising the likelihood of head contact with parts of the vehicle interior. The front passenger airbag cannot be disabled so a rearward-facing child restraint should not be used in that seating position. The dangers of doing so are clearly indicated inside the vehicle.
- Good
- Adequate
- Marginal
- Weak
- Poor
 
                Head Impact 4.2 Pts
Pelvis Impact 0.0 Pts
Leg Impact 6.0 Pts
The bumper scored maximum points for the protection offered to pedestrians' legs. However, protection provided to the head was predominantly poor, both in the areas likely to be struck by a child and those where an adult's head might strike. Assessment of the front edge of the bonnet was no appropriate owing to shape and size of the vehicle.
- Good
- Adequate
- Marginal
- Weak
- Poor
| Performance | ||
| Vehicle Yaw Rate @ COS + 1.00 s | 1.88% | meets ECE requirements | 
| Vehicle Yaw Rate @ COS + 1.75 s | 1.66% | meets ECE requirements | 
| Lateral Displacement @ BOS + 1.07 s | 2.45 m | meets ECE requirements | 
The Hyundai H-1 has electronic stability control as standard equipment. However, there is no seatbelt reminder system, even for the driver's seat, and a speed-limitation system is also not available.
- Specifications
- Safety Equipment
- Videos
- Rating Validity
Specifications
Tested Model Hyundai H-1 2.5 diesel GLS, LHD
Body Type - 8/9 seater van
Year Of Publication 2012
Kerb Weight 1900kg
VIN From Which Rating Applies - KMHWH81KBDU506106
Class Large MPV
Safety Equipment
Note: Other equipment may be available on the vehicle but was not considered in the test year.
- Fitted to the vehicle as standard 
- Fitted to the vehicle as option 
- Not fitted to the test vehicle but available as option 
- Not Available 
- Not Applicable 
Videos
Rating Validity














Find more information in the General Comments section of the assessment
 Share
 Share
        






 
             
             
             
             
                        
The passenger compartment remained stable in the frontal impact. Dummy readings indicated good protection of the knees and femurs of the front seat occupants. However, structures in the dashboard were thought to present a risk to occupants of different sizes and to those sat in different positions. In the side impact test, protection of the chest was adequate while that of other body areas was good. No pole test was done as the H-1 is not equipped with a head-protecting airbag. A geometric assessment of front and rear seats revealed poor protection against whiplash injury in the event of a rear-end collision.