Pour plus d’informations, veuillez consulter la section Commentaires généraux de l’évaluation
Vous trouverez plus d’informations dans l’onglet Validité de la notation
-
Plus d'info
![]()
87% -
Plus d'info
![]()
87% -
Plus d'info
![]()
79% -
Plus d'info
![]()
71%
- Bon
- Satisfaisant
- Moyen
- Faible
- Médiocre
Passager
Conducteur
Passager arrière
Conducteur
Voiture
Poteau
Siège arrière
Siège avant
- Bon
- Satisfaisant
- Moyen
- Faible
- Médiocre
Passager
latéral
Centre
latéral
![]()
Monté sur le véhicule de série![]()
Véhicule testé non équipé mais disponible en option![]()
Non disponible
-
bébés jusqu'à 13 kg
-
bébés et jeunes enfants jusqu'à 18 kg
-
Jeunes enfants de 9 à 18 kg
-
Petits enfants de plus de 18 kg
![]()
Installation sans problème![]()
installation avec précaution![]()
problème critique de sécurité![]()
installation non autorisée
installation avec précaution
problème critique de sécurité| Position de siège | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Avant | 2e rangée | 3e rangée | ||||
| Passager | Gauche | Centre | Droite | Gauche | Droite | |
| Maxi Cosi Cabriofix (Belt) | |
|
|
|
|
|
| Britax Römer King Plus (Belt) | |
|
|
|
|
|
| Britax Römer Duo Plus (ISOFIX) | |
|
|
|
|
|
| Britax Römer KidFix (Belt) | |
|
|
|
|
|
| Maxi Cosi Cabriofix & EasyFix (Belt) | |
|
|
|
|
|
| Maxi Cosi Cabriofix & EasyFix (ISOFIX) | |
|
|
|
|
|
| BeSafe iZi Kid X3 ISOfix (ISOFIX) | |
|
|
|
|
|
| Maxi Cosi Pearl & Familyfix (ISOFIX) | |
|
|
|
|
|
| Britax Römer KidFix (ISOFIX) | |
|
|
|
|
|
![]()
Installation sans problème![]()
installation avec précaution![]()
problème critique de sécurité![]()
installation non autorisée
The car scored maximum points for its protection of the 1½ year dummy in the dynamic impact tests. Forward movement of the 3 year dummy, sat in a forward-facing restraint, was not excessive in the frontal impact, although neck tensile forces were marginally high. In the side impact, both dummies were properly contained within the protective shells of their restraints, minimising the likelihood of head contact with parts of the vehicle interior. The front passenger airbag can be disabled to allow a rearward-facing restraint to be used in that seating position. Clear information is provided to the driver regarding the status of the airbag and the system was rewarded. All of the restraint types for which the vehicle is designed could be properly installed and accommodated in the vehicle, including those in the optional third row seats.
- Bon
- Satisfaisant
- Moyen
- Faible
- Médiocre
Choc à la tête 16,8 Pts
Choc au bassin 5,8 Pts
Choc aux jambes 6,0 Pts
The bumper scored maximum points, showing good protection to pedestrians' legs in all areas tested. The pelvic area was well or adequately protected. The bonnet offered predominantly good or adequate protection to the head of a struck pedestrian, with poor results recorded only on the stiff windscreen pillars. The S-MAX's optional-fit autonomous emergency braking system recognises pedestrians as well as other cars. Euro NCAP will start to assess the performance of such functionality in 2016 so the system cannot be rewarded here.
- Bon
- Satisfaisant
- Moyen
- Faible
- Médiocre
| Nom du système | Speed Limiter |
| Fonction d'information de limitation de vitesse | Camera based |
| Fonction d'alerte | System advised |
| Fonction de limitation de vitesse | Manually or automatically set |
| Nom du système | ESP | |
| Performances | ||
| Taux d'embardée du véhicule à COS + 1.00 s | 0% | Répond aux exigences de la CEE |
| Taux d'embardée du véhicule à COS + 1.75 s | 0% | Répond aux exigences de la CEE |
| Déplacement latéral à BOS + 1.07 s | 3.4 m | Répond aux exigences de la CEE |
| S'applique à | All seats | ||
| Alerte | Siège conducteur | passager(s) avant | passager(s) arrière |
| Visuelle | |
|
|
| Sonore | |
|
|
|
|||
| Nom du système | Lane Keeping Alert and Lane Keeping Aid |
| Type | Lane Departure Warning and Lane Keep Assist |
| Alerte | Visual & Haptic |
| Performances | |
|
Test de confirmation d'alerte de franchissement involontaire de ligne (LDW)
|
Pass |
Electronic stability control is standard equipment, as is a seatbelt reminder system for the front and rear seats. A lane assistance system is an option that is expected to be widely fitted. The system combines lane departure warning with lane keeping assistance i.e. it will warn the driver if the car is drifting to the edge of the lane and will automatically steer the car gently back into its lane if needed. A speed assistance system is also an option. It uses a camera to detect the local speed limit and provides this information to the driver, who can then set the speed limiter appropriately or allow the system to do so automatically. An autonomous emergency braking system is available as an option but is not expected to be sold in sufficient numbers to qualify for assessment here.
- Caractéristiques
- Équipement de sécurité
- Vidéos
- Validité de la notation
Caractéristiques
Modèle testé Ford Galaxy 2.0 diesel 'Titanium', LHD
Type de carrosserie - 5 door wagon
Année de production 2015
Poids en ordre de marche 1725kg
NIV à partir duquel la notation s'applique - applies to all S-MAX's of the specification tested
Catégorie Grand monospace
Équipement de sécurité
Remarque : d'autres équipements peuvent être disponibles sur le véhicule mais n'ont pas été pris en compte dans l'année de test.
![]()
Monté sur le véhicule de série![]()
Monté sur le véhicule en option![]()
Véhicule testé non équipé mais disponible en option![]()
Non disponible![]()
Non applicable
Vidéos
Validité de la notation
Pour plus d’informations, veuillez consulter la section Commentaires généraux de l’évaluation
Euro NCAP examined the new Ford S-MAX and confirmed that it would perform equally or marginally better than the Ford Galaxy. Accordingly, the Galaxy was tested but the results of that assessment, and the star rating achieved, are valid also for the S-MAX.
Partager
The passenger compartment remained stable in the frontal impact. All critical body areas of the passenger dummy were well protected. Dummy readings showed good protection for the knees and femurs of both the driver and passenger dummies. Ford showed that a similar level of protection would be provided to occupants of different sizes and to those sat in different positions. In the full width rigid barrier test, protection of all body areas was good for except for the chest. Dummy readings indicated adequate chest protection for the driver dummy and marginal chest protection for the rear passenger. Maximum points were scored in both the side barrier impact and the more severe side pole test, with good protection of all body areas. The front seats and head restraints provided good protection against whiplash injuries in the event of a rear-end collision. A geometric assessment of the rear seats, including the optional third row, indicated poor whiplash protection for those seating positions. An autonomous emergency braking system is available as an option but does not qualify for assessment as it is not standard equipment.