How safe is your car ?

Select one or more vehicles among the following possibilities.

OR
OR
All results & rewards
Menu
With safety pack
With standard equipment
  • With standard equipment
  • With safety pack
2017 Info

Ford Mustang (reassessment)

Roadster Sport
Rating Expired Icon Rating Expired

Share this on:
Publication: July 2017

Find more information in the General Comments section of the assessment

Find more information in the Rating Validity tab of the assessment

text a changé
  • Adult Occupant

    72%
    See More
  • Child Occupant

    32%
    See More
  • Pedestrian

    78%
    See More
  • Safety Assist

    61%
    See More
Total 27.7 Pts / 72%
  • Good
  • Adequate
  • Marginal
  • Weak
  • Poor
Frontal Offset Deformable Barrier
6.9 Pts
Passenger
Driver
Frontal Full Width
4.7 Pts
Rear Passenger
Driver
Lateral Impact
14.9 Pts
Car
Pole
Whiplash Rear Impact
1.2 Pts
Rear Seat
Front Seat
AEB City
0.0 Pts
Performance:
Good

Comments
Total 15.8 Pts / 32%
  • Good
  • Adequate
  • Marginal
  • Weak
  • Poor
Crash Test Performance based on 6 & 10 year old children 13.6 Pts
Frontal Impact
9.6 Pts
Lateral Impact
4 Pts

Restraint for 6 year old child: Britax Römer KidFix XP
Restraint for 10 year old child: 0
Q10
Q6
Q6
Q10
Safety Features 0.0 Pts
Front
Passenger
2nd row
outboard
Isofix
i-Size
Integrated CRS
  • Fitted to the vehicle as standard
  • Not fitted to the test vehicle but available as option
  • Not Available
CRS Installation Check 2.2 Pts
crs
Installation
  • Easy
  • Difficult
  • Safety critical
  • Not allowed
Seat Position
Front 2nd row
Passenger Left Right
Maxi Cosi 2way Pearl & 2wayFix (rearward) (iSize)
Maxi Cosi 2way Pearl & 2wayFix (forward) (iSize)
BeSafe iZi Kid X2 i-Size (iSize)
Maxi Cosi Cabriofix & FamilyFix (ISOFIX)
BeSafe iZi Kid X4 ISOfix (ISOFIX)
Britax Römer Duo Plus (ISOFIX)
Britax Römer KidFix XP (ISOFIX)
Maxi Cosi Cabriofix (Belt)
Maxi Cosi Cabriofix & EasyBase2 (Belt)
Britax Römer King II LS (Belt)
Britax Römer KidFix XP (Belt)
  • Easy
  • Difficult
  • Safety critical
  • Not allowed
Detailed Test Results
Comments
Total 32.8 Pts / 78%
  • Good
  • Adequate
  • Marginal
  • Weak
  • Poor
VRU Impact Protection
27.0 Pts
VRU Impact Protection

Head Impact 21.0 Pts

Pelvis Impact 0.0 Pts

Leg Impact 6.0 Pts

AEB Pedestrian 5.8 Pts
System Name Pre Collision Assist (PCA)
Type Auto-Brake with Forward Collision Warning
Operational From 5 km/h
Additional Information Defaults on for every journey; operates above 40km/h and in low ambient light
PERFORMANCE |
Autobrake Function
Avoidance Mitigation
Running Adult crossing from Farside
Collision avoided up to 45 km/h Impact mitigated up to 60 km/h
Walking Adult crossing from Nearside -25%
Collision avoided up to 40 km/h Impact mitigated up to 60 km/h
Walking Adult crossing from Nearside -75%
Collision avoided up to 50 km/h Impact mitigated up to 60 km/h
Running Child from behind parked vehicles
Collision avoided up to 40 km/h Impact mitigated up to 50 km/h
Comments
Total 7.4 Pts / 61%
  • Good
  • Adequate
  • Marginal
  • Weak
  • Poor
Speed Assistance 0 Pts
Seatbelt Reminder 2.0 Pts
Applies To Front seats
Warning Driver Seat Front Passenger(s) Rear Passenger(s)
Visual
Audible
  • Pass
  • Fail
  • Not available
Lane Support 2.7 Pts
System Name Lane Keeping Aid
Type Lane Keep Assist and Lane Departure Warning
Operational From 65 km/h
Warning Audible
Performance
LKA Confirmation Test
Pass (4/5)
LDW Confirmation Test
Pass
AEB Inter-Urban 2.7 Pts
System Name Pre Collision Assist (PCA)
Type Forward Collision Warning with Auto-Brake
Operational From 5 km/h
Additional Information Default On
Performance |
Autobrake Function Only Driver reacts to warning
Operational Speed 5-300 km/h 5-300 km/h
Approaching a stationary car See AEB City Crash avoided up to 75km/h.
Crash speed reduced up to 80km/h.
Approaching a slower moving car Crash avoided up to 70km/h. Crash avoided up to 80km/h.
Following a car at short distance
Car in front brakes gently Avoidance Avoidance
Car in front brakes harshly Mitigation Mitigation
Following a car at long distance
Car in front brakes gently Avoidance Avoidance
Car in front brakes harshly Avoidance Avoidance
Comments
  • Specifications
  • Safety Equipment
  • Videos
  • Rating Validity

Specifications

Tested Model Ford Mustang 5.0 Fastback, LHD

Body Type - 2 door coupe

Year Of Publication 2017

Kerb Weight 1768kg

VIN From Which Rating Applies - all 2018 model year Mustang Fastbacks

Class Roadster sports

Safety Equipment

Driver
Passenger
Rear
FRONTAL CRASH PROTECTION
Front Airbag
Driver
Passenger
Rear
Belt Pretensioner
Driver
Passenger
Rear
Belt Loadlimiter
Driver
Passenger
Rear
Knee Airbag
Driver
Passenger
Rear
LATERAL CRASH PROTECTION
Side Head Airbag
Driver
Passenger
Rear
Side Chest Airbag
Driver
Passenger
Rear
Side Pelvis Airbag
Driver
Passenger
Rear
CHILD PROTECTION
Isofix/i-Size
Driver
Passenger
Rear
Integrated Child Seat
Driver
Passenger
Rear
Airbag cut-off switch
Driver
Passenger
Rear
SAFETY ASSIST
Seatbelt Reminder
Driver
Passenger
Rear
OTHER SAFETY SYSTEMS
Active Bonnet
Active Bonnet
AEB Pedestrian
AEB Pedestrian
AEB City
AEB City
AEB Interurban
AEB Interurban
Speed Assistance
Speed Assistance
Lane Assist System
Lane Assist System

Note: Other equipment may be available on the vehicle but was not considered in the test year.

  • Fitted to the vehicle as standard
  • Fitted to the vehicle as part of the safety pack
  • Not fitted to the test vehicle but available as option or as part of the safety pack
  • Not available
  • Not applicable

Videos

Rating Validity

Variants of Model Range

Body Type Engine & Transmission Model Name/Code Drivetrain Rating Applies
        LHD RHD
* 2 door coupe 5.0 V8 Manual and Automatic Mustang Fastback 5.0 V8 4 x 2
yes
yes
2 door coupe 2.3 EcoBoost Manual and Automatic Mustang Fastback 2.3 EcoBoost 4 x 2
yes
yes
2 door convertible 5.0 V8 Manual and Automatic Mustang Convertible 5.0 V8 4 x 2
no
no
2 door convertible 2.3 EcoBoost Manual and Automatic Mustang Convertible 2.3 EcoBoost 4 x 2
no
no

* Tested variant

Annual Reviews and Facelifts

Date
Event
Outcome
July 2017
Rating Published
2017

Find more information in the General Comments section of the assessment

General comments


Share

Subscribe for our latest news