-
Plus d'info
![]()
94% -
Plus d'info
![]()
86% -
Plus d'info
![]()
70% -
Plus d'info
![]()
100%
- Bon
- Satisfaisant
- Moyen
- Faible
- Médiocre
Passager
Conducteur
Siège avant
Voiture
Poteau
- Bon
- Satisfaisant
- Moyen
- Faible
- Médiocre
Passager
latéral
Centre
![]()
Monté sur le véhicule de série![]()
Véhicule testé non équipé mais disponible en option![]()
Non disponible
Véhicule testé non équipé mais disponible en optionBased on dummy readings in the dynamic tests, the Kuga scored maximum points for its protection of both the 3 year and 18 month infants. In the frontal test, forward movement of the 3 year dummy, sat in a forward-facing restraint, was not excessive. In the side impact, both dummies were properly contained by the protective shells of their restraints, minimising the likelihood of head contact with parts of the car interior. A switch is available as an option which allows the passenger airbag to be disabled, allowing a rearward-facing child restraint to be used in that seating position. The switch was not assessed as it is not standard equipment. The dangers of using a rearward-facing child restraint without first disabling that airbag are clearly marked inside the car.
- Bon
- Satisfaisant
- Moyen
- Faible
- Médiocre
Choc à la tête 15.4 Pts
Choc au bassin 3.7 Pts
Choc aux jambes 6 Pts
The bumper scored maximum points for its protection of pedestrians' legs. In most areas where the bonnet would be struck by the head of a child, good protection was provided. However, in those areas likely to be struck by an adult's head, protection was predominantly poor or marginal.
- Bon
- Satisfaisant
- Moyen
- Faible
- Médiocre
| Nom du système | ESP | |
| Performances | ||
| Taux d'embardée du véhicule à COS + 1.00 s | 0% | Répond aux exigences de la CEE |
| Taux d'embardée du véhicule à COS + 1.75 s | 0% | Répond aux exigences de la CEE |
| Déplacement latéral à BOS + 1.07 s | 2.59 m | Répond aux exigences de la CEE |
| S'applique à | All seats | ||
| Alerte | Siège conducteur | passager(s) avant | passager(s) arrière |
| Visuelle | |
|
|
| Sonore | |
|
|
|
|||
ÉchoueElectronic stability control is standard equipment and met Euro NCAP's test requirements. A seatbelt reminder is also standard for both front and rear seats while a driver-set speed limitation device scored maximum points in Euro NCAP's assessment.
- Caractéristiques
- Équipement de sécurité
- Vidéos
- Advanced Rewards
- Évaluations annuelles et nouvelles versions
Caractéristiques
Modèle testé Ford Kuga 2.0 diesel 'Trend', LHD
Type de carrosserie - 5 door SUV
Année de production 2012
Poids en ordre de marche 1665kg
NIV à partir duquel la notation s'applique - applies to all Kuga of the specification tested
Catégorie Petit SUV
Équipement de sécurité
Remarque : d'autres équipements peuvent être disponibles sur le véhicule mais n'ont pas été pris en compte dans l'année de test.
![]()
Monté sur le véhicule de série![]()
Monté sur le véhicule en option![]()
Véhicule testé non équipé mais disponible en option![]()
Non disponible![]()
Non applicable
Monté sur le véhicule en optionVidéos
Advanced Rewards
Évaluations annuelles et nouvelles versions
Partager
The passenger compartment remained stable in the frontal impact. Dummy readings indicated good protection of the knees and femurs of both the driver and passenger and Ford demonstrated that a similar level of protection would be provided for occupants of different sizes and to those sat in different positions. In the side barrier test, the Kuga scored maximum points, with good protection of all body regions. In the more severe side pole test, protection of the chest was adequate and that of other body regions was good. The seat and head restraint provided good protection against whiplash injuries in the event of a rear-end collision.