Pour plus d’informations, veuillez consulter la section Commentaires généraux de l’évaluation
Vous trouverez plus d’informations dans l’onglet Validité de la notation
- Plus d'info
- Plus d'info
- Plus d'info
- Plus d'info
- Bon
- Satisfaisant
- Moyen
- Faible
- Médiocre








- Bon
- Satisfaisant
- Moyen
- Faible
- Médiocre


Passager
latéral
Centre
Monté sur le véhicule de série
Véhicule testé non équipé mais disponible en option
Non disponible
-
bébés jusqu'à 13 kg
-
bébés et jeunes enfants jusqu'à 18 kg
-
Jeunes enfants de 9 à 18 kg
-
Petits enfants de plus de 18 kg
Installation sans problème
installation avec précaution
problème critique de sécurité
installation non autorisée
Position de siège | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Avant | 2e rangée | |||
Passager | Gauche | Centre | Droite | |
Maxi Cosi Cabriofix (Belt) | ||||
Britax Römer King Plus (Belt) | ||||
Britax Römer Duo Plus (ISOFIX) | ||||
Britax Römer KidFix (Belt) | ||||
Maxi Cosi Cabriofix & EasyFix (Belt) | ||||
Maxi Cosi Cabriofix & EasyFix (ISOFIX) | ||||
BeSafe iZi Kid X3 ISOfix (ISOFIX) | ||||
Maxi Cosi Pearl & Familyfix (ISOFIX) | ||||
Britax Römer KidFix (ISOFIX) |
Installation sans problème
installation avec précaution
problème critique de sécurité
installation non autorisée
Both child dummies were sat in rearward-facing restraints in the offset frontal test. The car scored maximum points for its protection of both the 1½ year and 3 year dummies in the frontal offset and side barrier tests. In the side impact, both dummies were properly contained within the protective shells of their restraints, minimising the risk of head contact with parts of the vehicle interior. The front passenger airbag can be disabled to allow a rearward-facing restraint to be used in that seating position. Clear information is provided to the driver regarding the status of the airbag and the system was rewarded. All of the restraint types for which the X1/X2 is designed could be correctly installed and accommodated in the car.
- Bon
- Satisfaisant
- Moyen
- Faible
- Médiocre

Choc à la tête 19,4 Pts
Choc au bassin 1,3 Pts
Choc aux jambes 6,0 Pts
Both the X1 and the X2 have a 'pop-up' bonnet. Sensors in the bumper detect when a pedestrian has been struck and actuators raise the bonnet to provide greater clearance between the surface and the hard structures in the engine compartment. BMW showed that the system worked robustly for a variety of pedestrian statures and across a range of speeds. Accordingly, tests were done with the bonnet in the deployed (raised) position. Results on the bonnet surface were almost entirely good, with some areas of adequate protection to a pedestrian's head. Some poor results were recorded only on the front edge of the windscreen and on the stiff windscreen pillars. Additional tests on the X2 gave results that were better than those of the X1. The bumper scored maximum points for the protection it offered to pedestrians' legs. Protection of the pelvic region was predominantly poor.
- Bon
- Satisfaisant
- Moyen
- Faible
- Médiocre
Nom du système | ISA |
Fonction d'information de limitation de vitesse | Camera based |
Fonction d'alerte | System advised |
Fonction de limitation de vitesse | System advised |
Nom du système | DSC (Dynamic Stability Control) | |
Performances | ||
Taux d'embardée du véhicule à COS + 1.00 s | 0% | Répond aux exigences de la CEE |
Taux d'embardée du véhicule à COS + 1.75 s | 0% | Répond aux exigences de la CEE |
Déplacement latéral à BOS + 1.07 s | 3.3 m | Répond aux exigences de la CEE |
S'applique à | All seats | ||
Alerte | Siège conducteur | passager(s) avant | passager(s) arrière |
Visuelle | |||
Sonore | |||
|
Nom du système | Approach Warning with City Brake Activation | |||
Type | Forward Collision Warning with Auto-Brake | |||
Opérationnel à compter de/du | 5 km/h | |||
Informations supplémentaires | Default On | |||
Performances | | ||||
Uniquement fonction de freinage automatique | Le conducteur réagit à l'alerte | |||
Vitesse opérationnelle | 5-80 km/h | 5-250 km/h | ||
A l'approche d'une voiture à l'arrêt | Se reporter à Système de freinage d'urgence autonome (AEB) urbain | Accident évité jusqu'à 70 km/hVitesse lors de l'accident réduite jusqu'à 80 km/h | ||
A l'approche d'une voiture qui roule plus lentement | Accident évité jusqu'à 40 km/hVitesse lors de l'accident réduite jusqu'à 70 km/h | Accident évité jusqu'à 80 km/h | ||
En suivant de près une voiture | ||||
La voiture devant freine légèrement | Atténuation | Évitement | ||
La voiture devant freine brusquement | Atténuation | Atténuation | ||
En suivant de loin une voiture | ||||
La voiture devant freine légèrement | Atténuation | Évitement | ||
La voiture devant freine brusquement | Atténuation | Évitement |
Electronic stability control is standard equipment on the X1 and X2, together with a seatbelt reminder system that protects the front and rear seats. Autonomous emergency braking is also standard and demonstrated adequate performance in Euro NCAP's tests. A standard-fit, camera-based speed limiter advises the driver of the limit and allows the driver to set the appropriate maximum speed for the vehicle.
- Caractéristiques
- Équipement de sécurité
- Vidéos
- Validité de la notation
Caractéristiques
Modèle testé BMW X1 sDrive18d, LHD
Type de carrosserie - 5 door SUV
Année de production 2015
Poids en ordre de marche 1320kg
NIV à partir duquel la notation s'applique - all X1s and X2s
Catégorie Petit SUV
Équipement de sécurité
Remarque : d'autres équipements peuvent être disponibles sur le véhicule mais n'ont pas été pris en compte dans l'année de test.
Monté sur le véhicule de série
Monté sur le véhicule en option
Véhicule testé non équipé mais disponible en option
Non disponible
Non applicable
Vidéos


Validité de la notation














Pour plus d’informations, veuillez consulter la section Commentaires généraux de l’évaluation
The BMW X2 shares a platform and almost all of its structure with the X1. As the X2 has a slightly different side frame and a new bumper front, additional tests have been performed, notably in side, pole and leg impact. A review by Euro NCAP of the results of these tests and of further data provided by BMW reveals that the 2015 rating of the X1 can also be applied to the X2.

The passenger compartment remained stable in the frontal offset test. Dummy readings indicated good protection of the knees and femurs of both the driver and passenger dummy. BMW showed that a similar level of protection would be provided to occupants of different sizes and to those sat in different positions. Data reviewed by Euro NCAP showed marginally better performance of the X2 than that of the X1 in this test. In the full-width rigid barrier impact, protection of all body regions was good for all critical body regions of the driver and rear passenger, with the exception of the chest, protection of which was adequate. Data for the X2 showed slightly poorer chest protection than that of the X1 but, overall performance was very similar. The X1 scored maximum points in both the side barrier test and in the more severe side pole test, with good protection of all critical parts of the body. When the same tests were repeated on the X2, good protection was again seen for all critical body areas. The front seats and head restraints demonstrated good protection against whiplash injury in the event of a rear-end impact while a geometric assessment of the rear seats indicated marginal whiplash protection for the occupants of those seats. The standard-fit autonomous emergency braking system showed good performance in Euro NCAP's tests of its performance at the low speeds at which many whiplash injuries are caused.