- With standard equipment
- With safety pack
Pour plus d’informations, veuillez consulter la section Commentaires généraux de l’évaluation
Vous trouverez plus d’informations dans l’onglet Validité de la notation
- Plus d'info
- Plus d'info
- Plus d'info
- Plus d'info
- Bon
- Satisfaisant
- Moyen
- Faible
- Médiocre


- Bon
- Satisfaisant
- Moyen
- Faible
- Médiocre


Passager
latéral
Centre
Monté sur le véhicule de série
Véhicule testé non équipé mais disponible en option
Non disponible
-
i-Size
-
ISOFIX
-
Système de retenue pour enfant à dispositif universel d'ancrage
Installation sans problème
installation avec précaution
problème critique de sécurité
installation non autorisée
Position de siège | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Avant | 2e rangée | |||
Passager | Gauche | Centre | Droite | |
Maxi Cosi 2way Pearl & 2wayFix (i-Size) | ||||
Maxi Cosi 2way Pearl & 2wayFix (i-Size) | ||||
BeSafe iZi Kid X2 i-Size (i-Size) | ||||
Britax Römer TriFix2 i-Size (i-Size) | ||||
BeSafe iZi Flex FIX i-Size (i-Size) | ||||
BeSafe iZi Combi X4 ISOfix (ISOFIX) | ||||
Cybex Solution Z i-Fix (ISOFIX) | ||||
Maxi Cosi Cabriofix (Belt) | ||||
Maxi Cosi Cabriofix & EasyFix (Belt) | ||||
Britax Römer King II LS (Belt) | ||||
Cybex Solution Z i-Fix (Belt) |
Installation sans problème
installation avec précaution
problème critique de sécurité
installation non autorisée
In both the frontal offset and the side impact barrier tests, protection of all critical body areas was good for all critical body areas, for both the 6 and 10 year dummy, and maximum points were scored for this part of the assessment. The front passenger airbag can be disabled to allow a reward-facing child restraint to be used in that seating position. Clear information is provided to the driver regarding the status of the airbag and the system was rewarded. All of the child restraint types for which the car is designed could be properly installed and accommodated.
- Bon
- Satisfaisant
- Moyen
- Faible
- Médiocre

Choc à la tête 20,8 Pts
Choc au bassin 0,8 Pts
Choc aux jambes 6,0 Pts
Nom du système | Pedestrian Warning with City Braking Function | |||
Type | Auto-Brake with Forward Collision Warning | |||
Opérationnel à compter de/du | 5 km/h | |||
Performances | | ||||
Fonction de freinage automatique |
-
Cycliste du côté passager, vue obstruée
-
Cycliste traversant la route
-
Cycliste le long de la route
The i4 has an ‘active’ bonnet. Sensors in the bumper detect when a pedestrian has been hit and actuators lift the bonnet surface to provide greater clearance to the hard structures in the engine compartment. BMW showed that the system operated robustly for different pedestrian statures and over a wide range of speeds. Accordingly, the bonnet was tested in the raised, ‘deployed’ position and the protection provided was almost completely good or adequate. The bumper provided good protection to pedestrians’ legs at all test locations but protection of the pelvis was largely poor. The autonomous emergency braking (AEB) system of the i4 can detect vulnerable road users, as well as other vehicles. The system performed adequately in tests of its response to pedestrians and to cyclists.
- Bon
- Satisfaisant
- Moyen
- Faible
- Médiocre
Nom du système | Speed Limit Assist |
Fonction d'information de limitation de vitesse | Camera & Map, subsigns supported |
Fonction de contrôle de vitesse | System advised (accurate to 5km/h) |
S'applique à | Front and rear seats | ||
Alerte | Siège conducteur | passager(s) avant | passager(s) arrière |
Visuelle | |||
Sonore | |||
Détection des occupants | |||
|
Nom du système | Attentiveness Assistant |
Type | Steering input |
Opérationnel à compter de/du | 70 km/h |
Nom du système | Lane Departure Warning |
Type | LKA and ELK |
Opérationnel à compter de/du | 70 km/h |
Performances | |
Système de maintien d’urgence dans la voie | |
Assistance au maintien sur la voie | |
Interface Homme-Machine |
Nom du système | Collision Warning with Braking Function | |||
Type | Autonomous emergency braking and forward collision warning | |||
Opérationnel à compter de/du | 5 km/h | |||
Capteur utilisé | camera and radar |
The AEB system performed adequately in tests of its response to other vehicles, with impacts avoided or mitigated in many test scenarios. A seatbelt reminder system is standard and the car is equipped with a system which monitors steering inputs and issues a warning when a pattern characteristic of drowsy or impaired driving is detected. A combined camera/navigation system identified the local speed limit and provides the information to the driver, allowing the speed limiter to be set accordingly. If the car is drifting out of lane, a lane keep assist system gently corrects the vehicle’s path. The system also intervenes in some more critical situations, to avoid road departure for example.
- Caractéristiques
- Équipement de sécurité
- Vidéos
- Validité de la notation
Caractéristiques
Modèle testé BMW i4, LHD
Type de carrosserie - 4 door saloon
Année de production 2022
Poids en ordre de marche 2050kg
NIV à partir duquel la notation s'applique - all i4s
Catégorie Grande familiale
Équipement de sécurité
Remarque : d'autres équipements peuvent être disponibles sur le véhicule mais n'ont pas été pris en compte dans l'année de test.
Monté sur le véhicule de série
Monté sur la voiture en tant qu'élément du pack sécurité
Pas monté sur le véhicule test mais disponible en tant qu'option ou élément du pack sécurité
Non disponible
Non applicable
Vidéos
Validité de la notation
Variantes de la gamme de modèles
Body Type | Engine | Model Name/Code | Drivetrain | Rating Applies | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
LHD | RHD | ||||
4 door saloon | Battery Electric | i4 eDrive40* | 4 x 2 | ![]() |
![]() |
4 door saloon | Battery Electric | i4 M50 | 4 x 4 | ![]() |
![]() |
* Tested variant


Pour plus d’informations, veuillez consulter la section Commentaires généraux de l’évaluation

The passenger compartment of the i4 remained stable in the frontal offset test. Dummy numbers demonstrated good protection for the knees and femurs of both the driver and passenger. BMW demonstrated that a similar level of protection would be provided to occupants of different sizes and to those sitting in different positions. Analysis of the deceleration of the impact trolley during the test, and analysis of the deformable barrier after the test, revealed that the i4 would be a moderately benign impact partner in a frontal collision. In the full width rigid-barrier impact, protection of all critical body areas was good or adequate, for both the driver and rear seat passenger. In both the side barrier test and the more severe side pole impact, protection of all critical body areas was good and maximum points were scored. Control of excursion (the extent to which a body is thrown to the other side of the vehicle when it is hit from the far side) was found to be adequate. The i4 does not have a counter-measure to mitigate against occupant to occupant injuries in such impacts. Tests on the front seats and head restraints demonstrated good protection against whiplash injuries in the event of a rear-end collision. A geometric analysis of the rear seats also indicated good whiplash protection. The i4 has an advanced eCall system which alerts the emergency services in the event of a crash but no system to apply the brakes after an impact to avoid secondary collisions.