- With standard equipment
- With safety pack
Pour plus d’informations, veuillez consulter la section Commentaires généraux de l’évaluation
Vous trouverez plus d’informations dans l’onglet Validité de la notation
- Plus d'info
- Plus d'info
- Plus d'info
- Plus d'info
- Bon
- Satisfaisant
- Moyen
- Faible
- Médiocre








-
A l’approche d’une voiture à l'arrêt: Décalage à gauche
-
A l’approche d’une voiture à l'arrêt: Pas de décalage
-
A l’approche d’une voiture à l'arrêt: Décalage à droite
- Bon
- Satisfaisant
- Moyen
- Faible
- Médiocre


Passager
latéral
Centre
Monté sur le véhicule de série
Véhicule testé non équipé mais disponible en option
Non disponible
-
i-Size
-
ISOFIX
-
Système de retenue pour enfant à dispositif universel d'ancrage
Installation sans problème
installation avec précaution
problème critique de sécurité
installation non autorisée
Position de siège | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Avant | 2e rangée | |||
Passager | Gauche | Centre | Droite | |
Maxi Cosi 2way Pearl & 2wayFix (rearward) (iSize) | ||||
Maxi Cosi 2way Pearl & 2wayFix (forward) (iSize) | ||||
BeSafe iZi Kid X2 i-Size (iSize) | ||||
BeSafe iZi Flex FIT i-Size (iSize) | ||||
Maxi Cosi Cabriofix & FamilyFix (ISOFIX) | ||||
BeSafe iZi Kid X4 ISOfix (ISOFIX) | ||||
Britax Römer Duo Plus (ISOFIX) | ||||
Britax Römer KidFix XP (ISOFIX) | ||||
Maxi Cosi Cabriofix (Belt) | ||||
Maxi Cosi Cabriofix & EasyBase2 (Belt) | ||||
Britax Römer King II LS (Belt) | ||||
Britax Römer KidFix XP (Belt) |
Installation sans problème
installation avec précaution
problème critique de sécurité
installation non autorisée
In the frontal test, dummy readings indicated good or adequate protection for both child occupants. However, the 10 year dummy was not fully restrained during the whole impact and, as a consequence, no points were scored for this dummy. In the side barrier impact, all critical body areas were well protected for both dummies and the U5 scored maximum points in this part of the assessment. The front passenger airbag can be disabled to allow a rearward-facing child restraint to be used in that seating position. Clear information is provided to the driver regarding the status of the airbag and the system was rewarded. All of the restraint types for which the U5 is designed could be properly installed and accommodated in the car.
- Bon
- Satisfaisant
- Moyen
- Faible
- Médiocre

Choc à la tête 15,9 Pts
Choc au bassin 0,0 Pts
Choc aux jambes 6,0 Pts
Nom du système | Autonomous Emergency Braking | |||
Type | Auto-Brake with Forward Collision Warning | |||
Opérationnel à compter de/du | 8 km/h | |||
Performances | | ||||
Fonction de freinage automatique |
-
Cycliste traversant la route
-
Cycliste le long de la route
The bonnet provided almost completely good or adequate protection to the head of a struck pedestrian, with a few poor results recorded on the stiff windscreen pillars. The bumper provided good protection to pedestrians' legs but protection of the pelvis was poor at all test locations. The U5's AEB system can detect vulnerable road users like pedestrians and cyclists, as well as other vehicles. In tests, the system's response to pedestrians was good and to cyclists was marginal. However, the performance in the sub-component pedestrian impact tests was just short of the threshold at which the car would be eligible to score points for its AEB system.
- Bon
- Satisfaisant
- Moyen
- Faible
- Médiocre
Nom du système | Traffic Sign Recognition and Speed Limiter |
Fonction d'information de limitation de vitesse | Camera based |
Fonction de contrôle de vitesse | Manually set (accurate to 10km/h) |
S'applique à | All Seats | ||
Alerte | Siège conducteur | passager(s) avant | passager(s) arrière |
Visuelle | |||
Sonore | |||
Détection des occupants | |||
|
Nom du système | LDW and LKA |
Type | LKA (including LDW) |
Opérationnel à compter de/du | 60 km/h |
Performances | |
Assistance au maintien sur la voie | |
Interface Homme-Machine |
Nom du système | Autonomous Emergency Braking | |||
Type | Autonomous Emergency Braking and Forward Collision Warning | |||
Opérationnel à compter de/du | 8 km/h | |||
Informations supplémentaires | Supplementary warning |
The U5 has a seatbelt reminder system for the front and rear seats. The AEB system performed adequately in tests of its response to other vehicles at highway speeds. A lane support system warns the driver if the car is drifting out of lane and also applies the steering gently to correct the vehicle's path. The speed assistance system uses a camera to identify local speed limits. This information is presented to the driver who can then set the speed limiter as appropriate. However, system did not work robustly: many signs were not recognised and the information presented to the driver was inadequate.
- Caractéristiques
- Équipement de sécurité
- Vidéos
- Validité de la notation
Caractéristiques
Modèle testé Aiways U5, LHD
Type de carrosserie - 5 door SUV
Année de production 2019
Poids en ordre de marche 1750kg
NIV à partir duquel la notation s'applique - all U5s
Catégorie Small Off-Road 4x4
Équipement de sécurité
Remarque : d'autres équipements peuvent être disponibles sur le véhicule mais n'ont pas été pris en compte dans l'année de test.
Monté sur le véhicule de série
Monté sur la voiture en tant qu'élément du pack sécurité
Pas monté sur le véhicule test mais disponible en tant qu'option ou élément du pack sécurité
Non disponible
Non applicable
Vidéos
Validité de la notation
Variantes de la gamme de modèles
Body Type | Engine & Transmission | Drivetrain | Rating Applies | |
---|---|---|---|---|
LHD | RHD | |||
5 door SUV | Battery electric* | 4 x 2 | ![]() |
N/A |
* Tested variant


Pour plus d’informations, veuillez consulter la section Commentaires généraux de l’évaluation

The passenger compartment of the U5 remained stable in the frontal offset test. Dummy readings indicated good protection of the knees and femurs of the driver and passenger. Aiways showed that a similar level of protection would be provided to occupants of different sizes and to those sitting in different positions. Protection of the front passenger was good for all critical body areas. In the full-width rigid barrier test, protection of all critical body regions was good for the driver and good or adequate for the rear passenger. In the side barrier impact, dummy readings indicated good protection of all body areas. However, the side curtain airbag had not deployed as designed, getting caught on the interior trim. The score for the driver's head was penalised and its protection rated as adequate. In the more severe side pole test, high readings of acceleration indicated that the airbag had not protected the head from the intruding structure, and its protection was rated as poor. As a result, all points for the pole test were lost. Aiways have since changed the timing of the airbag deployment to try to address the issue. Tests on the front seats and head restraints demonstrated good protection against whiplash injuries in the event of a rear-end collision. A geometric assessment of the rear seats indicated marginal whiplash protection. The standard-fit autonomous emergency braking (AEB) system performed well in tests of its functionality at the low speeds at which many whiplash injuries occur, with collisions avoided in most test scenarios.