- Más información
- Más información
- Más información
- Más información
- Bueno
- Adecuado
- Bajo
- Pobre
- Deficiente






- Bueno
- Adecuado
- Bajo
- Pobre
- Deficiente


Acompañante
exterior
Instalado en el vehículo de serie
No tenía el vehículo en prueba, pero disponible como opción
No disponible
-
bebés de hasta 13 kg
-
bebés y niños pequeños de hasta 18 kg
-
niños pequeños de entre 9 y 18 kg
-
Niños de más de 18 kg
Instale sin problemas
instale con cuidado
problema grave para la seguridad
instalación no permitida
Posición del asiento | |||
---|---|---|---|
Parte delantera | Segunda fila | ||
Acompañante | Lado izquierdo | Lado derecho | |
Maxi Cosi Cabriofix (Belt) | |||
Britax Römer King Plus (Belt) | |||
Britax Römer Duo Plus (ISOFIX) | |||
Britax Römer KidFix (Belt) | |||
Maxi Cosi Cabriofix & EasyFix (Belt) | |||
Maxi Cosi Cabriofix & EasyFix (ISOFIX) | |||
BeSafe iZi Kid X3 ISOfix (ISOFIX) | |||
Maxi Cosi Pearl & Familyfix (ISOFIX) | |||
Britax Römer KidFix (ISOFIX) |
Instale sin problemas
instale con cuidado
problema grave para la seguridad
instalación no permitida
Based on dummy readings alone, the Twingo scored maximum points for its protection of the 1½ year infant in the crash tests. Forward movement of the 3 year dummy, sat in a forward-facing seat, was not excessive but high tensile forces were recorded in the neck. The passenger airbag can be disabled to allow a rearward-facing child restraint to be used in that position. Clear information is provided to the driver regarding the status of the airbag and the system was rewarded. All of the categories of child restraints for which the car is designed could be properly installed and accommodated by the car.
- Bueno
- Adecuado
- Bajo
- Pobre
- Deficiente

Impacto en cabeza 15,3 Ptos
Impacto en pelvis 3,2 Ptos
Impacto en piernas 6,0 Ptos
The protection provided by the bumper was good, and the car scored maximum points in this area. However, the performance of the front edge of the bonnet was mixed but was predominantly weak or poor. The protection provided by the bonnet surface was mostly marginal or adequate, with some poor results recorded on the stiff windscreen pillars.
- Bueno
- Adecuado
- Bajo
- Pobre
- Deficiente
Función de limitación de velocidad | Manually Set |
Nombre del sistema | ESP | |
Comportamiento |
Se aplica a | All seats | ||
Advertencia | Asiento del conductor | acompañante delantero | acompañantes traseros |
Visual | |||
Audible | |||
|
The Twingo has a seatbelt reminder system as standard for the front and rear seats. A standard-fit speed assistance system informs the driver of the relevant speed limit and can be set by the driver accordingly. Electronic stability control is also standard. A lane departure warning system is available as an option but was not tested as it is not expected to be sold in sufficient numbers. There is no autonomous braking system on the Twingo.
- Especificaciones
- Equipamiento de seguridad
- Vídeos
- Validez de la valoración
Especificaciones
Modelo evaluado Renault Twingo 1.0 'E2', LHD
Tipo de carrocería - 5 door hatchback
Año de fabricación 2014
Peso en vacío 945kg
VIN a partir del cual se aplica la valoración - applies to all Twingos of the specification tested
Clase Segmento B
Equipamiento de seguridad
Nota: puede haber otro equipamiento en el vehículo, pero no se tuvo en cuenta en el año de prueba.
Instalado en el vehículo de serie
Instalado en el vehículo como opción
No tenía el vehículo en prueba, pero disponible como opción
No disponible
No aplicable
Vídeos
Validez de la valoración
Revisiones anuales y modelos rediseñados













The passenger compartment of the Twingo remained stable in the frontal impact. Protection of the passenger dummy was good for all parts of the body. Dummy readings indicated good protection of the knees and femurs of both the driver and passenger dummy. Renault showed that a similar level of protection would be provided to occupants of different sizes and to those sat in different positions. Rearward movement of the brake pedal led to a marginal rating for protection of the driver's feet and ankles. In the side barrier test, protection of all body regions was good except that of the chest, which was adequate. In the more severe side pole impact, dummy readings of rib deflections indicated weak protection of the chest. Protection against whiplash injuries in a rear-end collision was rated as good for the front seats and poor for the rear.